Quantitative analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography and comparison with histopathological results.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hüseyin Bülüç, Gamze Durhan, Kemal Kösemehmetoğlu, Meltem Gülsün Akpınar, Figen Demirkazık
{"title":"Quantitative analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography and comparison with histopathological results.","authors":"Hüseyin Bülüç, Gamze Durhan, Kemal Kösemehmetoğlu, Meltem Gülsün Akpınar, Figen Demirkazık","doi":"10.1177/02841851251333046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundContrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising and emerging digital mammography technique that improves diagnostic performance.PurposeTo quantitatively evaluate breast lesions on CEM and to investigate the effectiveness of CEM in differentiating benign lesions from malignancies. The secondary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness in lesion characterization of quantitative parameters derived from CEM, specifically relative signal density (RSD) and relative signal change (RSC).Material and MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of 170 lesions in 164 female patients who underwent CEM. Lesions were grouped as benign, non-infiltrating, and infiltrating cancer. RSD between lesion and background, including fatty and glandular tissue, was measured. RSCs between former (CC) and latter (MLO) images were calculated and contrast enhancement patterns were obtained. The association between CEM values and pathological results was analyzed.ResultsRelative signal differences on both CC and MLO CEM views showed higher relative signal density in infiltrating tumors than benign ones regardless of whether glandular tissue or fat tissue was used in proportion while different infiltrating malignant subgroups showed no statistical significance according to quantitative analysis (<i>P</i> < 0.001). No significant differences in contrast enhancement patterns (ascending, steady, and descending) were seen either between benign and malignant groups or among malignant subtypes.ConclusionCEM can be used to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions, regardless of fat or glandular tissue. However, no difference was observed between benign and malignant lesions according to the contrast-enhancement patterns. Therefore, contrast enhancement patterns in CEM and breast MRI may differ.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851251333046"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251333046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundContrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising and emerging digital mammography technique that improves diagnostic performance.PurposeTo quantitatively evaluate breast lesions on CEM and to investigate the effectiveness of CEM in differentiating benign lesions from malignancies. The secondary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness in lesion characterization of quantitative parameters derived from CEM, specifically relative signal density (RSD) and relative signal change (RSC).Material and MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of 170 lesions in 164 female patients who underwent CEM. Lesions were grouped as benign, non-infiltrating, and infiltrating cancer. RSD between lesion and background, including fatty and glandular tissue, was measured. RSCs between former (CC) and latter (MLO) images were calculated and contrast enhancement patterns were obtained. The association between CEM values and pathological results was analyzed.ResultsRelative signal differences on both CC and MLO CEM views showed higher relative signal density in infiltrating tumors than benign ones regardless of whether glandular tissue or fat tissue was used in proportion while different infiltrating malignant subgroups showed no statistical significance according to quantitative analysis (P < 0.001). No significant differences in contrast enhancement patterns (ascending, steady, and descending) were seen either between benign and malignant groups or among malignant subtypes.ConclusionCEM can be used to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions, regardless of fat or glandular tissue. However, no difference was observed between benign and malignant lesions according to the contrast-enhancement patterns. Therefore, contrast enhancement patterns in CEM and breast MRI may differ.

乳腺增强x光造影对乳腺病变的定量分析及与组织病理学结果的比较。
对比增强乳房x线摄影(CEM)是一种有前途的新兴数字乳房x线摄影技术,可以提高诊断性能。目的定量评价超声扫描对乳腺病变的影响,探讨超声扫描对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别价值。第二个目的是评估由CEM获得的定量参数,特别是相对信号密度(RSD)和相对信号变化(RSC)在病变表征方面的有效性。材料与方法回顾性分析164例女性CEM患者的170个病变。病变分为良性、非浸润性和浸润性癌。测量病变与背景(包括脂肪组织和腺组织)之间的RSD。计算前图像(CC)和后图像(MLO)之间的RSCs,获得对比度增强模式。分析CEM值与病理结果的关系。结果无论是腺组织还是脂肪组织,浸润性肿瘤的相对信号密度均高于良性肿瘤,而不同浸润性恶性亚组的相对信号密度定量分析均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信