Prediction Models for Maternal and Offspring Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2025-05-04 DOI:10.1111/obr.13934
Yasmina Al Ghadban, Nerys M Astbury, Abdallah Kurdi, Ankita Sharma, Beatrice Ope, Tzu-Ying Liu, Lucy MacKillop, Huiqi Y Lu, Jane E Hirst
{"title":"Prediction Models for Maternal and Offspring Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yasmina Al Ghadban, Nerys M Astbury, Abdallah Kurdi, Ankita Sharma, Beatrice Ope, Tzu-Ying Liu, Lucy MacKillop, Huiqi Y Lu, Jane E Hirst","doi":"10.1111/obr.13934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), affecting one in seven pregnant women worldwide, can have short- and long-term adverse outcomes for both the mother and her baby. Despite a raft of prognostic models aiming to predict adverse GDM outcomes, very few have impacted clinical practice. This systematic review summarizes and critically evaluates prediction models for GDM outcomes, to identify promising models for further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and CENTRAL for studies that reported the development or validation of predictive models for GDM outcomes in mother or offspring (PROSPERO: CRD42023396697).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four articles detailing 103 developed and 12 validated models were included in this review. Of these, 45% predicted long term, 31% birth, and 23% pregnancy outcomes. Most models (87%) had a high risk of bias, lacking sufficient outcome events, internal validation, or proper calibration. Only eight models were found at low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight a gap in rigorously developed prediction models for adverse GDM outcomes. There is a need to further validate existing models and evaluate their clinical utility to generate risk prediction tools capable of improving clinical decision-making for women with GDM and their children.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13934"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13934","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), affecting one in seven pregnant women worldwide, can have short- and long-term adverse outcomes for both the mother and her baby. Despite a raft of prognostic models aiming to predict adverse GDM outcomes, very few have impacted clinical practice. This systematic review summarizes and critically evaluates prediction models for GDM outcomes, to identify promising models for further evaluation.

Methods: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and CENTRAL for studies that reported the development or validation of predictive models for GDM outcomes in mother or offspring (PROSPERO: CRD42023396697).

Results: Sixty-four articles detailing 103 developed and 12 validated models were included in this review. Of these, 45% predicted long term, 31% birth, and 23% pregnancy outcomes. Most models (87%) had a high risk of bias, lacking sufficient outcome events, internal validation, or proper calibration. Only eight models were found at low risk of bias.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight a gap in rigorously developed prediction models for adverse GDM outcomes. There is a need to further validate existing models and evaluate their clinical utility to generate risk prediction tools capable of improving clinical decision-making for women with GDM and their children.

妊娠期糖尿病后母亲和后代短期和长期预后的预测模型:系统综述。
目的:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)影响全球七分之一的孕妇,可对母亲和婴儿产生短期和长期的不良后果。尽管有大量的预后模型旨在预测不良的GDM结果,但很少有模型影响临床实践。本系统综述总结并严格评估GDM结果的预测模型,以确定有前景的模型进行进一步评估。方法:我们检索了EMBASE、MEDLINE、Web of Science、CINAHL和CENTRAL,以获取报告了母体或后代GDM结局预测模型开发或验证的研究(PROSPERO: CRD42023396697)。结果:本综述纳入了64篇文章,详细介绍了103个已开发模型和12个已验证模型。其中45%预测长期,31%预测分娩,23%预测妊娠结局。大多数模型(87%)存在高偏倚风险,缺乏足够的结果事件、内部验证或适当的校准。只有8个模型具有低偏倚风险。结论:我们的研究结果强调了严格开发的GDM不良结局预测模型的差距。有必要进一步验证现有模型并评估其临床效用,以产生能够改善GDM妇女及其子女临床决策的风险预测工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信