Development and validation of a collaborative framework for assessment of peripheral facial paralysis using facial image regions of interest.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Xiaoyan Guo, Jiyue Chen, Pingju Lin, Qi Lu, Ting Kou, Kun Li, Shiming Yang, Weidong Shen
{"title":"Development and validation of a collaborative framework for assessment of peripheral facial paralysis using facial image regions of interest.","authors":"Xiaoyan Guo, Jiyue Chen, Pingju Lin, Qi Lu, Ting Kou, Kun Li, Shiming Yang, Weidong Shen","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2025.2502562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While accurate evaluation of PFP is crucial for determining optimal treatment strategies, current clinical assessments rely heavily on subjective evaluations, leading to considerable variability between inter- and intra-observer ratings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a collaborative framework for evaluating PFP based on regions of interest in facial images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and tested two approaches: (1) a collaborative framework integrating image interpretation techniques (representation learning <i>via</i> CNN) with predefined handcrafted features based on regions of interest in facial images, and (2) a convolutional neural network (CNN) model trained exclusively on full-face patient images. The diagnostic accuracy of both systems was evaluated using a test set and compared with otologists' assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The collaborative framework achieved a mean Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.92 for PFP prediction in the test set, surpassing the 0.76 AUC achieved by the CNN trained on full-face images. The framework's performance matched that of experienced otologists (accuracy: 80.0% vs. 77.2%; sensitivity: 85.3% vs. 77.7%). Moreover, system assistance improved primary clinicians' mean accuracy by 17.7 percentage points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that our collaborative framework-based automated diagnosis system can effectively assist clinicians in PFP diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2025.2502562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While accurate evaluation of PFP is crucial for determining optimal treatment strategies, current clinical assessments rely heavily on subjective evaluations, leading to considerable variability between inter- and intra-observer ratings.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a collaborative framework for evaluating PFP based on regions of interest in facial images.

Methods: We developed and tested two approaches: (1) a collaborative framework integrating image interpretation techniques (representation learning via CNN) with predefined handcrafted features based on regions of interest in facial images, and (2) a convolutional neural network (CNN) model trained exclusively on full-face patient images. The diagnostic accuracy of both systems was evaluated using a test set and compared with otologists' assessments.

Results: The collaborative framework achieved a mean Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.92 for PFP prediction in the test set, surpassing the 0.76 AUC achieved by the CNN trained on full-face images. The framework's performance matched that of experienced otologists (accuracy: 80.0% vs. 77.2%; sensitivity: 85.3% vs. 77.7%). Moreover, system assistance improved primary clinicians' mean accuracy by 17.7 percentage points.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that our collaborative framework-based automated diagnosis system can effectively assist clinicians in PFP diagnosis.

利用感兴趣的面部图像区域评估周围性面瘫的协作框架的开发和验证。
背景:虽然PFP的准确评估对于确定最佳治疗策略至关重要,但目前的临床评估严重依赖于主观评估,导致观察者之间和内部评分之间存在相当大的差异。目的:本研究旨在开发和验证一个基于面部图像感兴趣区域的PFP评估协作框架。方法:我们开发并测试了两种方法:(1)将图像解释技术(通过CNN表示学习)与基于面部图像感兴趣区域的预定义手工特征集成在一起的协作框架,以及(2)专门训练全脸患者图像的卷积神经网络(CNN)模型。使用测试集评估两种系统的诊断准确性,并与耳科医生的评估进行比较。结果:协作框架在测试集中实现了PFP预测的平均曲线下面积(Area Under The Curve, AUC)为0.92,超过了CNN在全脸图像上训练的0.76 AUC。该框架的表现与经验丰富的耳科医生相当(准确率:80.0% vs. 77.2%;敏感性:85.3% vs. 77.7%)。此外,系统辅助将初级临床医生的平均准确率提高了17.7个百分点。结论:基于协作框架的PFP自动诊断系统可以有效地辅助临床医生进行PFP诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信