Novel ultrasound scoring system to guide cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy: a prospective study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Fei Qin, Jingyun Wu, Jianguo Ma, Shaojuan Tian, Derun Li, Shuyuan Chen, Yi Liu, Xuesong Li
{"title":"Novel ultrasound scoring system to guide cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy: a prospective study.","authors":"Fei Qin, Jingyun Wu, Jianguo Ma, Shaojuan Tian, Derun Li, Shuyuan Chen, Yi Liu, Xuesong Li","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04903-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and validate a novel ultrasound scoring system (USS) for assisting cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy (cTB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively collected a study cohort consisting of 452 patients with biopsy-naïve, PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml and their 531 Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 ≥ 3 lesions. All MRI regions of interest were scored as USS 0, 1, 2, and 3 for the corresponding lesion or region on TRUS. The cumulative cancer detection rate of the biopsy cores was assessed according to USS. Subgroup analysis was conducted to assess the csPCa detection rate following the re-stratification of PI-RADS using USS. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed for USS, PI-RADS and USS + PI-RADS. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated at the cut-off selected by the Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cancer detection rates for USS scores of 0 to 3 were 0% (0/67), 66% (111/166), 83% (176/210), and 100% (59/59), respectively. For USS 2 and USS 3 lesions, the detection rates in targeting the 3rd core (79%, P = 0.774) and 2nd core (93%, P = 0.125) did not significantly increase with subsequent biopsy cores. In the subgroup analysis, the csPCa positive rate for USS 0 was zero across all PI-RADS categories. In contrast, USS 1, 2, and 3 enhanced the csPCa positive rate within each PI-RADS strata. In ROC analysis, the AUC (95% CI) for the combined USS + PI-RADS 0.85 (0.82-0.89) outperformed PI-RADS 0.77 (0.73-0.81) alone (P < 0.001). USS + PI-RADS sensitivity (95% CI) was 80.7% (75.6-84.9) compared to PI-RADS 72.5% (67.6-77.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In cTB, USS has good performance in cancer risk re-stratification, with higher USS scores correlating with an increased likelihood of cancer and improved diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>No. 2023-272-002, July 14, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04903-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a novel ultrasound scoring system (USS) for assisting cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy (cTB).

Methods: We prospectively collected a study cohort consisting of 452 patients with biopsy-naïve, PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml and their 531 Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 ≥ 3 lesions. All MRI regions of interest were scored as USS 0, 1, 2, and 3 for the corresponding lesion or region on TRUS. The cumulative cancer detection rate of the biopsy cores was assessed according to USS. Subgroup analysis was conducted to assess the csPCa detection rate following the re-stratification of PI-RADS using USS. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed for USS, PI-RADS and USS + PI-RADS. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated at the cut-off selected by the Youden index.

Results: The overall cancer detection rates for USS scores of 0 to 3 were 0% (0/67), 66% (111/166), 83% (176/210), and 100% (59/59), respectively. For USS 2 and USS 3 lesions, the detection rates in targeting the 3rd core (79%, P = 0.774) and 2nd core (93%, P = 0.125) did not significantly increase with subsequent biopsy cores. In the subgroup analysis, the csPCa positive rate for USS 0 was zero across all PI-RADS categories. In contrast, USS 1, 2, and 3 enhanced the csPCa positive rate within each PI-RADS strata. In ROC analysis, the AUC (95% CI) for the combined USS + PI-RADS 0.85 (0.82-0.89) outperformed PI-RADS 0.77 (0.73-0.81) alone (P < 0.001). USS + PI-RADS sensitivity (95% CI) was 80.7% (75.6-84.9) compared to PI-RADS 72.5% (67.6-77.0).

Conclusion: In cTB, USS has good performance in cancer risk re-stratification, with higher USS scores correlating with an increased likelihood of cancer and improved diagnostic accuracy.

Clinical trial registration: No. 2023-272-002, July 14, 2023.

新的超声评分系统指导认知融合靶向活检:一项前瞻性研究。
目的:开发和验证一种新的超声评分系统(USS),用于辅助认知融合靶向活检(cTB)。方法:我们前瞻性地收集了452例biopsy-naïve, PSA≤20 ng/ml的患者及其531例前列腺影像学报告和数据系统(PI-RADS) v2.1≥3个病变的研究队列。所有感兴趣的MRI区域在TRUS上对应病变或区域的uss0、1、2和3评分。根据USS评估活检芯的累积癌检出率。采用亚组分析评估使用USS对PI-RADS重新分层后的csPCa检出率。对USS、PI-RADS及USS + PI-RADS进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析。曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性在约登指数选择的截止点计算。结果:USS评分0 ~ 3分的肿瘤总检出率分别为0%(0/67)、66%(111/166)、83%(176/210)和100%(59/59)。对于USS 2和USS 3病变,针对第三核的检出率(79%,P = 0.774)和针对第二核的检出率(93%,P = 0.125)在随后的活检中没有显著增加。在亚组分析中,在所有PI-RADS类别中,us0的csPCa阳性率为零。相比之下,us1、us2和us3提高了每个PI-RADS地层中的csPCa阳性率。在ROC分析中,联合USS + PI-RADS的AUC (95% CI)为0.85(0.82-0.89)优于单独PI-RADS 0.77 (0.73-0.81) (P结论:在cTB中,USS在癌症风险再分层中表现良好,较高的USS评分与癌症可能性增加和诊断准确性提高相关。临床试验注册号:2023-272-002,2023年7月14日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信