Neck management in cT1-2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma: Act or watchful wait?

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Zi-Zhan Li, Li-Ya Wei, Lei-Ming Cao, Guang-Rui Wang, Kan Zhou, Yao Xiao, Han-Yue Luo, Si-Jie Zhang, Qiuji Wu, Bing Liu, Lin-Lin Bu
{"title":"Neck management in cT1-2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma: Act or watchful wait?","authors":"Zi-Zhan Li, Li-Ya Wei, Lei-Ming Cao, Guang-Rui Wang, Kan Zhou, Yao Xiao, Han-Yue Luo, Si-Jie Zhang, Qiuji Wu, Bing Liu, Lin-Lin Bu","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The controversy over neck management for cT1-2N0 OSCC patients has persisted for two decades. While selective neck dissection (SND) has been deemed effective, only 30% of patients actually exhibit lymph node metastasis (LNM). SND-related complications, such as shoulder dysfunction and lymphedema, significantly impact patient quality of life, suggesting that 70% of patients may not benefit from SND. Current guidelines advocate observation, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and SND, but the appropriate scenarios for each strategy need further exploration. Risk stratification assessment can inform treatment decisions in early-stage OSCC. This review explores histological risk factors, SLNB, gene expression profiles, and biomarkers for risk stratification. Additionally, we assess the potential value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), in cT1-2N0 OSCC. Risk-stratified approaches align with personalized medicine and precision surgery trends, while PORT and ICB may offer more reliable neck management options. This comprehensive review systematically synthesizes the past selection of therapeutic strategies for cT1-2N0 OSCC patients, alongside their respective strengths and limitations. We aspire to contribute to the optimization of treatment strategies for early-stage OSCC patients, ultimately enhancing both survival outcomes and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35455","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The controversy over neck management for cT1-2N0 OSCC patients has persisted for two decades. While selective neck dissection (SND) has been deemed effective, only 30% of patients actually exhibit lymph node metastasis (LNM). SND-related complications, such as shoulder dysfunction and lymphedema, significantly impact patient quality of life, suggesting that 70% of patients may not benefit from SND. Current guidelines advocate observation, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and SND, but the appropriate scenarios for each strategy need further exploration. Risk stratification assessment can inform treatment decisions in early-stage OSCC. This review explores histological risk factors, SLNB, gene expression profiles, and biomarkers for risk stratification. Additionally, we assess the potential value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), in cT1-2N0 OSCC. Risk-stratified approaches align with personalized medicine and precision surgery trends, while PORT and ICB may offer more reliable neck management options. This comprehensive review systematically synthesizes the past selection of therapeutic strategies for cT1-2N0 OSCC patients, alongside their respective strengths and limitations. We aspire to contribute to the optimization of treatment strategies for early-stage OSCC patients, ultimately enhancing both survival outcomes and quality of life.

c1 - 2n0口腔鳞状细胞癌的颈部治疗:采取行动还是观望等待?
关于cT1-2N0 OSCC患者颈部治疗的争论已经持续了二十年。虽然选择性颈部清扫术(SND)被认为是有效的,但实际上只有30%的患者表现出淋巴结转移(LNM)。SND相关并发症,如肩部功能障碍和淋巴水肿,显著影响患者的生活质量,这表明70%的患者可能无法从SND中获益。目前的指南提倡观察、前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)和SND,但每种策略的合适方案需要进一步探索。风险分层评估可为早期OSCC的治疗决策提供依据。这篇综述探讨了组织学危险因素、SLNB、基因表达谱和危险分层的生物标志物。此外,我们评估了术后放疗(PORT)和免疫治疗(特别是免疫检查点阻断(ICB))在cT1-2N0 OSCC中的潜在价值。风险分层方法符合个性化医疗和精准手术的趋势,而PORT和ICB可能提供更可靠的颈部管理选择。这篇全面的综述系统地综合了过去对cT1-2N0 OSCC患者的治疗策略的选择,以及它们各自的优势和局限性。我们渴望为优化早期OSCC患者的治疗策略做出贡献,最终提高生存结果和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信