Utility of circulating tumor DNA to detect minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Tung Hoang, Moon Ki Choi, Jae Hwan Oh, Jeongseon Kim
{"title":"Utility of circulating tumor DNA to detect minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Tung Hoang, Moon Ki Choi, Jae Hwan Oh, Jeongseon Kim","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for predicting minimal residual disease (MRD) and guiding treatment decisions in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to examine the study designs and settings of ongoing clinical trials that use ctDNA to guide treatment decisions and to determine the best timing for detecting MRD in non-metastatic CRC. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov for English language records. The ctDNA settings from the clinical trials were categorized by randomization to ctDNA testing, treatment options based on ctDNA results, and the timing of ctDNA testing relative to adjuvant therapy. For prospective studies, a network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach was conducted to examine the pairwise associations between different ctDNA timing strategies and MRD, defined as recurrence, relapse, and progression. The main approaches in ctDNA-based interventional trial designs were categorized as ctDNA-guided treatment, ctDNA-by-treatment, ctDNA-guided surveillance, and ctDNA-enriched adjuvant therapy for guiding treatment decisions, including both escalation and de-escalation strategies, and surveillance. Overall, both preoperative and postoperative ctDNA detection were linked to higher risks of progression, with pooled hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 5.23 (2.10-13.00) and 7.95 (5.30-11.91), respectively. Among the timing strategies, ctDNA testing after adjuvant therapy was the most effective for identifying high-risk patients, strongly suggesting the presence of residual disease. This study comprehensively reviewed the clinical settings of ctDNA testing in ongoing trials and provided evidence supporting the selection of post-adjuvant therapy as the optimal timing for ctDNA testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for predicting minimal residual disease (MRD) and guiding treatment decisions in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to examine the study designs and settings of ongoing clinical trials that use ctDNA to guide treatment decisions and to determine the best timing for detecting MRD in non-metastatic CRC. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov for English language records. The ctDNA settings from the clinical trials were categorized by randomization to ctDNA testing, treatment options based on ctDNA results, and the timing of ctDNA testing relative to adjuvant therapy. For prospective studies, a network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach was conducted to examine the pairwise associations between different ctDNA timing strategies and MRD, defined as recurrence, relapse, and progression. The main approaches in ctDNA-based interventional trial designs were categorized as ctDNA-guided treatment, ctDNA-by-treatment, ctDNA-guided surveillance, and ctDNA-enriched adjuvant therapy for guiding treatment decisions, including both escalation and de-escalation strategies, and surveillance. Overall, both preoperative and postoperative ctDNA detection were linked to higher risks of progression, with pooled hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 5.23 (2.10-13.00) and 7.95 (5.30-11.91), respectively. Among the timing strategies, ctDNA testing after adjuvant therapy was the most effective for identifying high-risk patients, strongly suggesting the presence of residual disease. This study comprehensively reviewed the clinical settings of ctDNA testing in ongoing trials and provided evidence supporting the selection of post-adjuvant therapy as the optimal timing for ctDNA testing.

循环肿瘤DNA检测结直肠癌微小残留疾病的效用:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)是预测结直肠癌(CRC)患者最小残留疾病(MRD)和指导治疗决策的有希望的生物标志物。本研究旨在检查正在进行的临床试验的研究设计和设置,这些试验使用ctDNA来指导治疗决策,并确定检测非转移性结直肠癌MRD的最佳时机。我们检索了PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library和clinicaltrials.gov的英文记录。临床试验的ctDNA设置按随机分组进行分类:ctDNA检测、基于ctDNA结果的治疗方案、ctDNA检测相对于辅助治疗的时间。对于前瞻性研究,使用频率分析方法进行了网络荟萃分析,以检查不同ctDNA定时策略与MRD(定义为复发、复发和进展)之间的成对关联。基于ctdna的介入试验设计的主要方法分为ctdna引导治疗、ctdna逐次治疗、ctdna引导监测和ctdna富集辅助治疗,用于指导治疗决策,包括升级和降级策略以及监测。总体而言,术前和术后ctDNA检测与更高的进展风险相关,合并风险比(95%置信区间)分别为5.23(2.10-13.00)和7.95(5.30-11.91)。在这些时间策略中,辅助治疗后的ctDNA检测对识别高危患者最有效,强烈提示存在残留疾病。本研究全面回顾了正在进行的试验中ctDNA检测的临床环境,并提供证据支持选择后辅助治疗作为ctDNA检测的最佳时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信