Amin Adibi, Christopher Carlsten, Emily P Brigham, Don D Sin, Peter Loewen, Mohsen Sadatsafavi
{"title":"Social Determinants of Health and Racial Disparities in Lung Function: Findings from NHANES 2007-2012.","authors":"Amin Adibi, Christopher Carlsten, Emily P Brigham, Don D Sin, Peter Loewen, Mohsen Sadatsafavi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>We hypothesized that the disproportionate impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) captured in survey data could help explain a larger proportion of racial gaps in lung function than previously reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We defined a series of nested, increasingly healthy reference populations using data from NHANES 2007-2012. Starting with non-smokers without respiratory symptoms or diagnoses, we sequentially excluded those with confirmed occupational exposure to dust/fumes, physical inactivity, maternal or second-hand tobacco use, obesity, no home ownership, no insurance, lower education, and self-reported unhealthy diet. Across successive populations, we compared average age-, sex-, and height-adjusted differences in FEV1 and FVC between racial and ethnic minority groups and Non-Hispanic White participants for adults (≥20) and children (6-19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In successively healthier reference populations, the proportion of represented participants declined for Non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, and Other Hispanic, increased for non-Hispanic White, and remained stable for Non-Hispanic Asian participants. At baseline, adjusted FEV1 and FVC were similar for Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic White Americans, but lower for other racial and ethnic minority groups. After excluding individuals with unfavorable SDoH, racial disparities in FEV1 and FVC decreased for Non-Hispanic Black children (24.8% and 26.2%) and adults (26.3% and 19.4%), Other Hispanic children (15.2% and 19.3%) and adults (85.9% and 12.4%), and Non-Hispanic Asian children (6.6% and 12.5%), but increased for Non-Hispanic Asian adults (14.1% and 11.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unfavorable SDoH disproportionately affected non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, and Other Hispanic populations, and explained a higher proportion of racial disparities in lung function than previously reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":"None"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale: We hypothesized that the disproportionate impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) captured in survey data could help explain a larger proportion of racial gaps in lung function than previously reported.
Methods: We defined a series of nested, increasingly healthy reference populations using data from NHANES 2007-2012. Starting with non-smokers without respiratory symptoms or diagnoses, we sequentially excluded those with confirmed occupational exposure to dust/fumes, physical inactivity, maternal or second-hand tobacco use, obesity, no home ownership, no insurance, lower education, and self-reported unhealthy diet. Across successive populations, we compared average age-, sex-, and height-adjusted differences in FEV1 and FVC between racial and ethnic minority groups and Non-Hispanic White participants for adults (≥20) and children (6-19).
Results: In successively healthier reference populations, the proportion of represented participants declined for Non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, and Other Hispanic, increased for non-Hispanic White, and remained stable for Non-Hispanic Asian participants. At baseline, adjusted FEV1 and FVC were similar for Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic White Americans, but lower for other racial and ethnic minority groups. After excluding individuals with unfavorable SDoH, racial disparities in FEV1 and FVC decreased for Non-Hispanic Black children (24.8% and 26.2%) and adults (26.3% and 19.4%), Other Hispanic children (15.2% and 19.3%) and adults (85.9% and 12.4%), and Non-Hispanic Asian children (6.6% and 12.5%), but increased for Non-Hispanic Asian adults (14.1% and 11.1%).
Conclusions: Unfavorable SDoH disproportionately affected non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, and Other Hispanic populations, and explained a higher proportion of racial disparities in lung function than previously reported.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.