Social Determinants of Health and Racial Disparities in Lung Function: Findings from NHANES 2007-2012.

IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Amin Adibi, Christopher Carlsten, Emily P Brigham, Don D Sin, Peter Loewen, Mohsen Sadatsafavi
{"title":"Social Determinants of Health and Racial Disparities in Lung Function: Findings from NHANES 2007-2012.","authors":"Amin Adibi, Christopher Carlsten, Emily P Brigham, Don D Sin, Peter Loewen, Mohsen Sadatsafavi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>We hypothesized that the disproportionate impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) captured in survey data could help explain a larger proportion of racial gaps in lung function than previously reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We defined a series of nested, increasingly healthy reference populations using data from NHANES 2007-2012. Starting with non-smokers without respiratory symptoms or diagnoses, we sequentially excluded those with confirmed occupational exposure to dust/fumes, physical inactivity, maternal or second-hand tobacco use, obesity, no home ownership, no insurance, lower education, and self-reported unhealthy diet. Across successive populations, we compared average age-, sex-, and height-adjusted differences in FEV1 and FVC between racial and ethnic minority groups and Non-Hispanic White participants for adults (≥20) and children (6-19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In successively healthier reference populations, the proportion of represented participants declined for Non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, and Other Hispanic, increased for non-Hispanic White, and remained stable for Non-Hispanic Asian participants. At baseline, adjusted FEV1 and FVC were similar for Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic White Americans, but lower for other racial and ethnic minority groups. After excluding individuals with unfavorable SDoH, racial disparities in FEV1 and FVC decreased for Non-Hispanic Black children (24.8% and 26.2%) and adults (26.3% and 19.4%), Other Hispanic children (15.2% and 19.3%) and adults (85.9% and 12.4%), and Non-Hispanic Asian children (6.6% and 12.5%), but increased for Non-Hispanic Asian adults (14.1% and 11.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unfavorable SDoH disproportionately affected non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, and Other Hispanic populations, and explained a higher proportion of racial disparities in lung function than previously reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":"None"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: We hypothesized that the disproportionate impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) captured in survey data could help explain a larger proportion of racial gaps in lung function than previously reported.

Methods: We defined a series of nested, increasingly healthy reference populations using data from NHANES 2007-2012. Starting with non-smokers without respiratory symptoms or diagnoses, we sequentially excluded those with confirmed occupational exposure to dust/fumes, physical inactivity, maternal or second-hand tobacco use, obesity, no home ownership, no insurance, lower education, and self-reported unhealthy diet. Across successive populations, we compared average age-, sex-, and height-adjusted differences in FEV1 and FVC between racial and ethnic minority groups and Non-Hispanic White participants for adults (≥20) and children (6-19).

Results: In successively healthier reference populations, the proportion of represented participants declined for Non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, and Other Hispanic, increased for non-Hispanic White, and remained stable for Non-Hispanic Asian participants. At baseline, adjusted FEV1 and FVC were similar for Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic White Americans, but lower for other racial and ethnic minority groups. After excluding individuals with unfavorable SDoH, racial disparities in FEV1 and FVC decreased for Non-Hispanic Black children (24.8% and 26.2%) and adults (26.3% and 19.4%), Other Hispanic children (15.2% and 19.3%) and adults (85.9% and 12.4%), and Non-Hispanic Asian children (6.6% and 12.5%), but increased for Non-Hispanic Asian adults (14.1% and 11.1%).

Conclusions: Unfavorable SDoH disproportionately affected non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, and Other Hispanic populations, and explained a higher proportion of racial disparities in lung function than previously reported.

肺功能健康和种族差异的社会决定因素:NHANES 2007-2012的研究结果。
基本原理:我们假设,调查数据中捕获的健康社会决定因素(SDoH)的不成比例影响可能有助于解释肺功能中种族差异的比例比先前报道的要大。方法:我们使用NHANES 2007-2012的数据定义了一系列嵌套的、越来越健康的参考人群。从没有呼吸道症状或诊断的非吸烟者开始,我们依次排除了那些确认职业暴露于粉尘/烟雾、缺乏运动、使用母亲或二手烟草、肥胖、无住房、无保险、教育程度较低和自我报告不健康饮食的人。在连续的人群中,我们比较了种族和少数民族群体与非西班牙裔白人参与者(≥20岁)和儿童(6-19岁)之间FEV1和FVC的平均年龄、性别和身高调整差异。结果:在连续健康的参考人群中,非西班牙裔黑人、墨西哥裔美国人和其他西班牙裔美国人的代表性参与者比例下降,非西班牙裔白人的代表性参与者比例增加,非西班牙裔亚洲人的代表性参与者比例保持稳定。在基线时,墨西哥裔美国人和非西班牙裔美国白人的调整FEV1和FVC相似,但其他种族和少数民族群体的调整FEV1和FVC较低。在排除不良SDoH个体后,非西班牙裔黑人儿童(24.8%和26.2%)和成人(26.3%和19.4%)、其他西班牙裔儿童(15.2%和19.3%)和成人(85.9%和12.4%)以及非西班牙裔亚洲儿童(6.6%和12.5%)的FEV1和FVC的种族差异有所下降,但非西班牙裔亚洲儿童(14.1%和11.1%)的种族差异有所增加。结论:不利的SDoH不成比例地影响非西班牙裔黑人、墨西哥裔美国人和其他西班牙裔人群,这解释了肺功能的种族差异比先前报道的比例更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信