{"title":"Glucocorticoid in systemic lupus erythematosus: the art beyond science.","authors":"Tsz Ching Mok, Chi Chiu Mok","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2494654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glucocorticoid (GC) remains the main stay of treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) but is associated with a myriad of untoward effects. On the other hand, withdrawal of maintenance immunosuppression, including low-dose GCs, carries a risk of SLE flare.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The molecular mechanisms of GCs and their implications for dosing strategies in clinical practice are discussed. Evidence regarding withdrawal of maintenance immunosuppression in SLE is reviewed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinions: </strong>The initial GC regimens for different manifestations of SLE are heterogeneous, with no major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on their efficacy and toxicities available. RCTs on withdrawal of immunosuppressive drugs in quiescent SLE are inconsistent but appear to show an increase in disease flares, with risk factors being younger age, renal disease, cessation of hydroxychloroquine, shorter duration of remission, serological activity, and an abrupt tapering regime. The lowest effective doses of GC and immunosuppressive drugs should be adopted, and the decision to withdraw immunosuppression should be individualized. Newer strategies for GC sparing, including combination therapy of immunosuppressive and biological/targeted agents, and the use of methylprednisolone pulses for initial therapy of less serious manifestations of SLE, could ameliorate the toxicities of immunosuppression and help advance to the ultimate target of drug-free remission.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2494654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Glucocorticoid (GC) remains the main stay of treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) but is associated with a myriad of untoward effects. On the other hand, withdrawal of maintenance immunosuppression, including low-dose GCs, carries a risk of SLE flare.
Areas covered: The molecular mechanisms of GCs and their implications for dosing strategies in clinical practice are discussed. Evidence regarding withdrawal of maintenance immunosuppression in SLE is reviewed.
Expert opinions: The initial GC regimens for different manifestations of SLE are heterogeneous, with no major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on their efficacy and toxicities available. RCTs on withdrawal of immunosuppressive drugs in quiescent SLE are inconsistent but appear to show an increase in disease flares, with risk factors being younger age, renal disease, cessation of hydroxychloroquine, shorter duration of remission, serological activity, and an abrupt tapering regime. The lowest effective doses of GC and immunosuppressive drugs should be adopted, and the decision to withdraw immunosuppression should be individualized. Newer strategies for GC sparing, including combination therapy of immunosuppressive and biological/targeted agents, and the use of methylprednisolone pulses for initial therapy of less serious manifestations of SLE, could ameliorate the toxicities of immunosuppression and help advance to the ultimate target of drug-free remission.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology.
Articles focus on the following key areas:
• Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines
• Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents
• New diagnostic approaches
• Screening and patient stratification
• Pharmacoeconomic studies
• New therapeutic indications for existing therapies
• Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction
• Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval
• Novel treatment strategies
• Epidemiological studies
• Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines
Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.