{"title":"A critical review of pesticides in aquatic environment: Current trends, environmental impacts, and advances in analytical extraction techniques.","authors":"Debasmita Datta, Bishwatma Biswas, Ayan Lodh, Vishal Kumar Parida, Sudha Goel","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pesticides are applied in agricultural fields to manage pests and diseases that threaten crop health and productivity. However, their presence in natural water systems is a significant concern due to their persistent composition and complex molecular structures. Additionally, their toxic and recalcitrant nature poses potential risks, leading to chronic health effects in humans. Typically detected in trace concentrations, pesticides present analytical challenges owing to their intricate chemical structures and diverse physical properties. Recent research highlights notable advancements in conventional pesticide extraction methods, aiming to develop eco-friendly and cost-effective techniques with high enrichment and recovery rates. This review begins by exploring the latest trends and ongoing research related to the occurrence and extraction of pesticides from various aquatic environments. The study then discusses the innovative extraction techniques currently employed for pesticide removal. Among liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) techniques, methods such as ionic liquid-based extraction (IL-LPME), deep eutectic solvent-based extraction (DES-LPME), air-assisted extraction, solidification of a floating organic drop (SFO), and ultrasound-assisted LPME are gaining attention due to their ease of handling, operational simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and environmental sustainability. In the, solid-phase extraction (SPE) field, researchers have increasingly utilized approaches like magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE), green sorbents, metal-organic framework (MOF) based extraction, cartridge-based SPE, and carbon nanotube-based SPE as the most widely adopted methods. These methods are preferred for their benefits, including efficient separation, rapid analysis, and environmentally sustainable practices. The latter sections of this review present a detailed comparative analysis of these extraction methods, evaluating critical parameters such as operational time, cost, chemical and energy consumption, and analytical accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":435,"journal":{"name":"Talanta","volume":"293 ","pages":"128094"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pesticides are applied in agricultural fields to manage pests and diseases that threaten crop health and productivity. However, their presence in natural water systems is a significant concern due to their persistent composition and complex molecular structures. Additionally, their toxic and recalcitrant nature poses potential risks, leading to chronic health effects in humans. Typically detected in trace concentrations, pesticides present analytical challenges owing to their intricate chemical structures and diverse physical properties. Recent research highlights notable advancements in conventional pesticide extraction methods, aiming to develop eco-friendly and cost-effective techniques with high enrichment and recovery rates. This review begins by exploring the latest trends and ongoing research related to the occurrence and extraction of pesticides from various aquatic environments. The study then discusses the innovative extraction techniques currently employed for pesticide removal. Among liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) techniques, methods such as ionic liquid-based extraction (IL-LPME), deep eutectic solvent-based extraction (DES-LPME), air-assisted extraction, solidification of a floating organic drop (SFO), and ultrasound-assisted LPME are gaining attention due to their ease of handling, operational simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and environmental sustainability. In the, solid-phase extraction (SPE) field, researchers have increasingly utilized approaches like magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE), green sorbents, metal-organic framework (MOF) based extraction, cartridge-based SPE, and carbon nanotube-based SPE as the most widely adopted methods. These methods are preferred for their benefits, including efficient separation, rapid analysis, and environmentally sustainable practices. The latter sections of this review present a detailed comparative analysis of these extraction methods, evaluating critical parameters such as operational time, cost, chemical and energy consumption, and analytical accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Talanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, short communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and on novel sensor and instrumentation developments, are encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, materials science and engineering, and analytical platforms for omics development are welcome.
Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. Simple spiking recoveries may not be sufficient. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.