Regional Assessments Under the Canadian Impact Assessment Act: Objectives, Outcomes and Lessons So Far.

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Steve Bonnell
{"title":"Regional Assessments Under the Canadian Impact Assessment Act: Objectives, Outcomes and Lessons So Far.","authors":"Steve Bonnell","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02176-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The planning and conduct of regional assessments (RAs) under the Canadian Impact Assessment Act (IAA) has reflected various objectives and planned outcomes. To date, this has included a key focus on improving the effectiveness and efficiency of subsequent project assessments through RA-provided information, analysis and mitigation, although the manner and degree to which these outputs will transfer to and affect the scope of later assessments has yet to be confirmed. Some RAs have also been designed to provide larger effects management and planning outputs, including identifying and recommending broader initiatives for addressing effects and maximizing benefits from future development. RA's potential role in influencing the nature, intensity and distribution of future activities has also been recognized, although this can be challenging where there is no regional planning mechanism for RA to engage with, and especially, given Canadian jurisdictional realities. RAs under the IAA are most likely to be successful in that regard where they are designed and conducted in cooperation with other jurisdictions, and especially, have a direct link to existing and applicable planning processes. Experience also suggests that even where this is the case, there may be challenges if neither process establishes an overall vision for future development, or where there is a lack of specificity in RA outputs or how they are planned to be used in decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02176-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The planning and conduct of regional assessments (RAs) under the Canadian Impact Assessment Act (IAA) has reflected various objectives and planned outcomes. To date, this has included a key focus on improving the effectiveness and efficiency of subsequent project assessments through RA-provided information, analysis and mitigation, although the manner and degree to which these outputs will transfer to and affect the scope of later assessments has yet to be confirmed. Some RAs have also been designed to provide larger effects management and planning outputs, including identifying and recommending broader initiatives for addressing effects and maximizing benefits from future development. RA's potential role in influencing the nature, intensity and distribution of future activities has also been recognized, although this can be challenging where there is no regional planning mechanism for RA to engage with, and especially, given Canadian jurisdictional realities. RAs under the IAA are most likely to be successful in that regard where they are designed and conducted in cooperation with other jurisdictions, and especially, have a direct link to existing and applicable planning processes. Experience also suggests that even where this is the case, there may be challenges if neither process establishes an overall vision for future development, or where there is a lack of specificity in RA outputs or how they are planned to be used in decision-making.

根据加拿大影响评估法进行的区域评估:目标、成果和迄今的教训。
根据《加拿大影响评估法》规划和开展的区域评估反映了各种目标和计划的成果。迄今为止,这方面的重点包括通过评估机构提供的信息、分析和缓解措施提高后续项目评估的效力和效率,尽管这些产出将以何种方式和程度转移到并影响到后续评估的范围尚未得到确认。一些评估方案还旨在提供更大的效果管理和规划产出,包括确定和建议更广泛的倡议,以处理影响和最大限度地从未来发展中获益。RA在影响未来活动的性质、强度和分布方面的潜在作用也得到了承认,尽管在没有RA参与的区域规划机制的情况下,特别是考虑到加拿大的司法现实,这可能具有挑战性。在这方面,如果与其他司法管辖区合作设计和实施,特别是与现有和适用的规划程序有直接联系,则根据《国际原子能机构协定》制定的评估措施最有可能取得成功。经验还表明,即使在这种情况下,如果这两个过程都没有确定未来发展的总体愿景,或者RA产出缺乏特异性或如何计划在决策中使用RA产出,也可能会遇到挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信