Characterizing complex care relationships in Canada using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Janaia Utas, Tasmin Adel, Charlotte Jensen, Stephanie A Chamberlain, Jennifer Baumbusch, Sharon Anderson, Jasneet Parmar, Lauren E Griffith, Andrea Gruneir
{"title":"Characterizing complex care relationships in Canada using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).","authors":"Janaia Utas, Tasmin Adel, Charlotte Jensen, Stephanie A Chamberlain, Jennifer Baumbusch, Sharon Anderson, Jasneet Parmar, Lauren E Griffith, Andrea Gruneir","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05972-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most caregiving research and policy has focused on dyadic, unidirectional relationships with one caregiver and one care receiver despite evidence for more complex caring relationships.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe caregivers and care receivers' relationships, with a focus on non-dyadic relationships, using baseline data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed unweighted baseline CLSA data to describe different self-reported care relationships. Care relationships of interest included: a) spousal reciprocal relationships, b) care chains, where one person receives and gives care with separate individuals, c) care caravans, where one person receives care from multiple caregivers, and d) compound caregivers, where one person provides care to multiple care receivers. We estimated frequencies for categorical variables, and either means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges for continuous variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included 51,338 CLSA participants. Of these respondents, 39% identified as a caregiver (mean age 62, 54% women), 6.5% identified as a care receiver (mean age 65, 58% women), and 5.3% identified as both a caregiver and care receiver (mean age 63, 65% women). Our research showed that 40% of caregivers reported giving care to 2 or more receivers and 52% of care receivers reported receiving care from 2 or more caregivers. Individuals both receiving and giving care demonstrated the following relationships: compound care chains (73%), care chains (19%), and reciprocal spousal care (4.6%). Gender characterization showed women had a wider range of care partners and were more likely to identify as caregivers and care receivers. While spouse and first degree relatives were the most commonly reported caregivers, friends and others were a large proportion of reported caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that a large proportion of caregiving relationships were best described as a network that frequently included multiple caregivers, multiple care receivers, and some in both roles, as well as non-kin and extended relative participants. This characterization of care relationships allows us to better understand the needs of older adults and their caregivers as the population ages and care shifts towards aging-in-place strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05972-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Most caregiving research and policy has focused on dyadic, unidirectional relationships with one caregiver and one care receiver despite evidence for more complex caring relationships.

Objective: To describe caregivers and care receivers' relationships, with a focus on non-dyadic relationships, using baseline data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed unweighted baseline CLSA data to describe different self-reported care relationships. Care relationships of interest included: a) spousal reciprocal relationships, b) care chains, where one person receives and gives care with separate individuals, c) care caravans, where one person receives care from multiple caregivers, and d) compound caregivers, where one person provides care to multiple care receivers. We estimated frequencies for categorical variables, and either means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges for continuous variables.

Results: Our sample included 51,338 CLSA participants. Of these respondents, 39% identified as a caregiver (mean age 62, 54% women), 6.5% identified as a care receiver (mean age 65, 58% women), and 5.3% identified as both a caregiver and care receiver (mean age 63, 65% women). Our research showed that 40% of caregivers reported giving care to 2 or more receivers and 52% of care receivers reported receiving care from 2 or more caregivers. Individuals both receiving and giving care demonstrated the following relationships: compound care chains (73%), care chains (19%), and reciprocal spousal care (4.6%). Gender characterization showed women had a wider range of care partners and were more likely to identify as caregivers and care receivers. While spouse and first degree relatives were the most commonly reported caregivers, friends and others were a large proportion of reported caregivers.

Conclusion: We found that a large proportion of caregiving relationships were best described as a network that frequently included multiple caregivers, multiple care receivers, and some in both roles, as well as non-kin and extended relative participants. This characterization of care relationships allows us to better understand the needs of older adults and their caregivers as the population ages and care shifts towards aging-in-place strategies.

利用加拿大老龄化纵向研究(里昂证券)在加拿大描述复杂的护理关系。
尽管有证据表明存在更复杂的护理关系,但大多数护理研究和政策都集中在一个照顾者和一个照顾者之间的二元单向关系上。目的:描述照顾者和受照顾者的关系,重点是非二元关系,使用来自加拿大老龄化纵向研究(里昂证券)的基线数据。方法:在这个横断面研究中,我们分析了未加权的基线里昂证券数据来描述不同的自我报告的护理关系。关心的照顾关系包括:a)配偶互惠关系,b)照顾链,一个人接受和提供照顾,c)照顾大篷车,一个人接受多个照顾者的照顾,d)复合照顾者,一个人向多个照顾者提供照顾。我们估计了分类变量的频率,以及连续变量的均值和标准差或中位数和四分位数范围。结果:我们的样本包括51,338名里昂证券参与者。在这些受访者中,39%确定为照顾者(平均年龄62岁,女性占54%),6.5%确定为照顾者(平均年龄65岁,女性占58%),5.3%确定为照顾者和照顾者(平均年龄63岁,女性占65%)。我们的研究表明,40%的照顾者报告照顾2个或更多的受照顾者,52%的受照顾者报告从2个或更多的照顾者那里得到照顾。接受和给予护理的个体表现出以下关系:复合护理链(73%),护理链(19%)和互惠配偶护理(4.6%)。性别特征表明,女性有更广泛的照顾对象,更有可能认为自己是照顾者和接受照顾者。虽然配偶和第一级亲属是最常见的照顾者,但朋友和其他人在照顾者中所占的比例很大。结论:我们发现,很大比例的照顾关系可以被描述为一个网络,这个网络经常包括多个照顾者、多个照顾者、一些人同时扮演两个角色,以及非亲属和扩展亲属参与者。这种护理关系的特征使我们能够更好地理解老年人及其照顾者的需求,因为人口老龄化和护理转向了原地老龄化战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信