Analysing the clinical outcomes between FIGO 2009 and 2023 staging for endometrial cancer-a single institution retrospective study.

IF 1.3 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2025.1836
Divya P Vuppu, Anupama Rajanbabu, Indu R Nair, Anjaly S Nair, Ajay Sasidharan, Kalavagunta Sruthi, Keechilat Pavithran, Reshma Jeladharan
{"title":"Analysing the clinical outcomes between FIGO 2009 and 2023 staging for endometrial cancer-a single institution retrospective study.","authors":"Divya P Vuppu, Anupama Rajanbabu, Indu R Nair, Anjaly S Nair, Ajay Sasidharan, Kalavagunta Sruthi, Keechilat Pavithran, Reshma Jeladharan","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2025.1836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The latest International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging for endometrial cancer incorporated molecular profiles and histopathological factors into the basic staging framework. This study was done to determine its implications when applied in real-world clinical practice. The main objectives were to analyse the stage shifts and determine the stage-wise 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two staging systems. It was a single-institution retrospective study that included all Endometrial cancer patients who underwent surgery between January 2015 and June 2021. Cases that underwent primary or incomplete surgery elsewhere and cases with histological types of cancer not included in FIGO 2023 staging were excluded from the study. All patients were staged according to FIGO 2009 and 2023 staging for endometrial cancer. This study found most stage shifts among stage I cases; based on aggressive histology, 33.8% (<i>n</i> = 65/192) of cases in stage IA and IB upstaged to stage IIC (2023). Meanwhile, among the advanced stages, most were downstaged, i.e., from stage IIIA to stage IA3 0.6% (<i>n</i> = 1/15), from stage IVB to stage IIIB2 (2023), i.e., 32% (<i>n</i> = 8/25). This study failed to show any significant differences in the stage-wise 3-year OS rate and DFS rate between the two staging systems. The present study provided preliminary data on the latest FIGO endometrial staging system. Due to the addition of subgroups based on prognostic factors, most upstages occurred in the early stages, while downshifts occurred in the advanced stages. There was no clinical difference in the 3-year OS and DFS rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2025.1836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The latest International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging for endometrial cancer incorporated molecular profiles and histopathological factors into the basic staging framework. This study was done to determine its implications when applied in real-world clinical practice. The main objectives were to analyse the stage shifts and determine the stage-wise 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two staging systems. It was a single-institution retrospective study that included all Endometrial cancer patients who underwent surgery between January 2015 and June 2021. Cases that underwent primary or incomplete surgery elsewhere and cases with histological types of cancer not included in FIGO 2023 staging were excluded from the study. All patients were staged according to FIGO 2009 and 2023 staging for endometrial cancer. This study found most stage shifts among stage I cases; based on aggressive histology, 33.8% (n = 65/192) of cases in stage IA and IB upstaged to stage IIC (2023). Meanwhile, among the advanced stages, most were downstaged, i.e., from stage IIIA to stage IA3 0.6% (n = 1/15), from stage IVB to stage IIIB2 (2023), i.e., 32% (n = 8/25). This study failed to show any significant differences in the stage-wise 3-year OS rate and DFS rate between the two staging systems. The present study provided preliminary data on the latest FIGO endometrial staging system. Due to the addition of subgroups based on prognostic factors, most upstages occurred in the early stages, while downshifts occurred in the advanced stages. There was no clinical difference in the 3-year OS and DFS rates.

分析FIGO 2009年和2023年子宫内膜癌分期的临床结果——单机构回顾性研究
最新的国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)子宫内膜癌分期将分子特征和组织病理学因素纳入基本分期框架。本研究的目的是确定其在实际临床实践中的应用。主要目的是分析两种分期系统之间的分期转移并确定分期的3年总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。这是一项单机构回顾性研究,纳入了2015年1月至2021年6月期间接受手术的所有子宫内膜癌患者。在其他地方接受过原发性或不完全手术的病例以及未纳入FIGO 2023分期的组织学类型的癌症病例被排除在研究之外。所有患者均根据FIGO 2009和2023子宫内膜癌分期进行分期。这项研究发现,在I期病例中,大多数阶段发生了转移;根据侵袭性组织学,33.8% (n = 65/192)的IA和IB期病例抢到了IIC期(2023)。与此同时,在晚期患者中,大部分患者的发病期下降,即从IIIA期降至IA3期的占0.6% (n = 1/15),从IVB期降至IIIB2期的占2023例,占32% (n = 8/25)。本研究未显示两种分期系统在分期方面的3年OS率和DFS率有任何显著差异。本研究提供了最新的FIGO子宫内膜分期系统的初步数据。由于增加了基于预后因素的亚组,大多数上升期发生在早期,而下降期发生在晚期。3年OS和DFS无临床差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信