Comprehensive chromosomal abnormality detection: integrating CNV-Seq with traditional karyotyping in prenatal diagnostics.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Yan Huang, Shuai Fu, Di Shao, Yanhua Yao, Fangyan Wu, Minrong Yao
{"title":"Comprehensive chromosomal abnormality detection: integrating CNV-Seq with traditional karyotyping in prenatal diagnostics.","authors":"Yan Huang, Shuai Fu, Di Shao, Yanhua Yao, Fangyan Wu, Minrong Yao","doi":"10.1186/s12920-025-02139-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-Seq) in detecting chromosomal abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis, comparing its performance with traditional karyotype analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1001 prenatal samples collected between April 2021 and December 2023. Samples were analyzed using both CNV-Seq and karyotype analysis. The detection rates of chromosomal abnormalities were compared between the two methods across various prenatal diagnostic indications. Clinical follow-up was performed to assess pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CNV-Seq detected chromosomal abnormalities in 89 of 1,001 cases (8.9%), compared to 50 cases (5.0%) identified by traditional karyotyping. CNV-Seq not only detected all abnormalities identified by karyotyping, including common aneuploidies such as trisomy 21 and sex chromosome abnormalities, but also uncovered 53 additional pathogenic submicroscopic CNVs associated with 33 known syndromes. The detection rates of CNV-Seq were significantly higher in high-risk groups, such as those identified by non-invasive prenatal testing (HR-NIPT) and maternal serum screening (HR-MSS), demonstrating superior sensitivity and accuracy in prenatal diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CNV-Seq demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting chromosomal abnormalities, particularly submicroscopic alterations, compared to traditional karyotyping. The study highlights the potential of CNV-Seq as a valuable tool in prenatal diagnostics, offering improved detection of genetic abnormalities and guiding clinical decision-making. However, a combined approach using both CNV-Seq and karyotype analysis is recommended for comprehensive prenatal genetic screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":8915,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Genomics","volume":"18 1","pages":"81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-025-02139-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-Seq) in detecting chromosomal abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis, comparing its performance with traditional karyotype analysis.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1001 prenatal samples collected between April 2021 and December 2023. Samples were analyzed using both CNV-Seq and karyotype analysis. The detection rates of chromosomal abnormalities were compared between the two methods across various prenatal diagnostic indications. Clinical follow-up was performed to assess pregnancy outcomes.

Results: CNV-Seq detected chromosomal abnormalities in 89 of 1,001 cases (8.9%), compared to 50 cases (5.0%) identified by traditional karyotyping. CNV-Seq not only detected all abnormalities identified by karyotyping, including common aneuploidies such as trisomy 21 and sex chromosome abnormalities, but also uncovered 53 additional pathogenic submicroscopic CNVs associated with 33 known syndromes. The detection rates of CNV-Seq were significantly higher in high-risk groups, such as those identified by non-invasive prenatal testing (HR-NIPT) and maternal serum screening (HR-MSS), demonstrating superior sensitivity and accuracy in prenatal diagnostics.

Conclusion: CNV-Seq demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting chromosomal abnormalities, particularly submicroscopic alterations, compared to traditional karyotyping. The study highlights the potential of CNV-Seq as a valuable tool in prenatal diagnostics, offering improved detection of genetic abnormalities and guiding clinical decision-making. However, a combined approach using both CNV-Seq and karyotype analysis is recommended for comprehensive prenatal genetic screening.

综合染色体异常检测:整合CNV-Seq与传统核型在产前诊断中的应用。
背景:本研究旨在评价拷贝数变异测序(CNV-Seq)在产前诊断中检测染色体异常的有效性,并将其与传统的核型分析进行比较。方法:对2021年4月至2023年12月采集的1001份产前样本进行回顾性分析。采用CNV-Seq和核型分析对样品进行分析。比较了两种方法在不同产前诊断指征中的染色体异常检出率。临床随访评估妊娠结局。结果:1001例患者中,CNV-Seq检测到染色体异常89例(8.9%),而传统核型检测到染色体异常50例(5.0%)。CNV-Seq不仅检测到核型鉴定的所有异常,包括常见的非整倍体,如21三体和性染色体异常,而且还发现了与33种已知综合征相关的53种额外的致病性亚显微镜cnv。CNV-Seq在高危人群中的检出率明显较高,如通过无创产前检测(HR-NIPT)和母体血清筛查(HR-MSS)确定的高危人群,在产前诊断中具有较高的敏感性和准确性。结论:与传统的核型分析相比,CNV-Seq在检测染色体异常,特别是亚显微改变方面表现出更高的灵敏度。该研究强调了CNV-Seq作为产前诊断有价值工具的潜力,提供了改进的遗传异常检测和指导临床决策。然而,建议使用CNV-Seq和核型分析相结合的方法进行全面的产前遗传筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Genomics
BMC Medical Genomics 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
243
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Genomics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of functional genomics, genome structure, genome-scale population genetics, epigenomics, proteomics, systems analysis, and pharmacogenomics in relation to human health and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信