Structural biology in variant interpretation: Perspectives and practices from two studies.

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
American journal of human genetics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.03.010
Matthew J Varga, Marcy E Richardson, Adam Chamberlin
{"title":"Structural biology in variant interpretation: Perspectives and practices from two studies.","authors":"Matthew J Varga, Marcy E Richardson, Adam Chamberlin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Structural biology offers a powerful lens through which to assess genetic variants by providing insights into their impact on clinically relevant protein structure and function. Due to the availability of new, user-friendly, web-based tools, structural analyses by wider audiences have become more mainstream. These new tools, including AlphaMissense and AlphaFold, have recently been in the limelight due to their initial success and projected future promise; however, the intricacies and limitations of using these tools still need to be disseminated to the more general audience that is likely to use them in variant analysis. Here, we expound on frameworks applying structural biology to variant interpretation by examining two accompanying articles. To this end, we explore the nuances of choosing the correct protein model, compare and contrast various structural approaches, and highlight both the advantages and limitations of employing structural biology in variant interpretation. Using two articles published in this issue of The American Journal of Human Genetics as a baseline, we focus on case studies in TP53 and BRCA1 to illuminate gene-specific differences in the applications of structural information, which illustrate the complexities inherent in this field. Additionally, we discuss the implications of recent advancements, such as AlphaFold, and provide practical guidance for researchers navigating variant interpretation using structural biology.</p>","PeriodicalId":7659,"journal":{"name":"American journal of human genetics","volume":"112 5","pages":"984-992"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of human genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.03.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structural biology offers a powerful lens through which to assess genetic variants by providing insights into their impact on clinically relevant protein structure and function. Due to the availability of new, user-friendly, web-based tools, structural analyses by wider audiences have become more mainstream. These new tools, including AlphaMissense and AlphaFold, have recently been in the limelight due to their initial success and projected future promise; however, the intricacies and limitations of using these tools still need to be disseminated to the more general audience that is likely to use them in variant analysis. Here, we expound on frameworks applying structural biology to variant interpretation by examining two accompanying articles. To this end, we explore the nuances of choosing the correct protein model, compare and contrast various structural approaches, and highlight both the advantages and limitations of employing structural biology in variant interpretation. Using two articles published in this issue of The American Journal of Human Genetics as a baseline, we focus on case studies in TP53 and BRCA1 to illuminate gene-specific differences in the applications of structural information, which illustrate the complexities inherent in this field. Additionally, we discuss the implications of recent advancements, such as AlphaFold, and provide practical guidance for researchers navigating variant interpretation using structural biology.

结构生物学中的变异解释:两项研究的观点与实践。
结构生物学提供了一个强大的镜头,通过它提供洞察遗传变异对临床相关蛋白质结构和功能的影响来评估遗传变异。由于新的、用户友好的、基于web的工具的可用性,由更广泛的受众进行的结构分析已变得更加主流。这些新工具,包括AlphaMissense和AlphaFold,最近因其最初的成功和未来的前景而备受关注;然而,使用这些工具的复杂性和局限性仍然需要传播给可能在变体分析中使用它们的更一般的受众。在这里,我们通过检查两篇随附的文章来阐述将结构生物学应用于变异解释的框架。为此,我们探讨了选择正确蛋白质模型的细微差别,比较和对比了各种结构方法,并强调了在变异解释中使用结构生物学的优点和局限性。以发表在本期《美国人类遗传学杂志》上的两篇文章为基础,我们将重点放在TP53和BRCA1的案例研究上,以阐明结构信息应用中的基因特异性差异,这说明了该领域固有的复杂性。此外,我们还讨论了最近的进展,如AlphaFold的影响,并为研究人员利用结构生物学导航变异解释提供了实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
4.10%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Human Genetics (AJHG) is a monthly journal published by Cell Press, chosen by The American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) as its premier publication starting from January 2008. AJHG represents Cell Press's first society-owned journal, and both ASHG and Cell Press anticipate significant synergies between AJHG content and that of other Cell Press titles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信