Linguistic equity: Anatomy educators and inclusive language.

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Melissa A Carroll, Kelly M Harrell
{"title":"Linguistic equity: Anatomy educators and inclusive language.","authors":"Melissa A Carroll, Kelly M Harrell","doi":"10.1002/ase.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Incorporating inclusive language in healthcare education allows learners to develop holistic communication skills. Adhering to principles of linguistic equity in healthcare, specific to sex- and gender-inclusive language (SGIL), creates a safe environment for all participants. Anatomy education introduces students to a standard, consistent language used in healthcare. This report presents data from the 2022 Experimental Biology conference roundtable discussion regarding the use of SGIL in anatomy education. Most of the respondents had defined sex (i.e. male/female; 83%) and gender (i.e. man/woman; 66.7%) for their learners since 2018 (67.4%). Most often, sex- and gender-diverse (SGD) topics are discussed during the pelvis, perineum, and reproduction content (50%). While teaching teams and departments have made attempts, most believe the current use of SGIL is inconsistent (66.7%). Although there is no consensus on best practice, a few recommendations emerged, including (1) early integration of linguistic equity, (2) patient-centered educational interventions, and (3) multi-level discussions. These data and recommendations should be treated as a pilot for future research. Future studies should investigate anatomy educators' use of SGIL, including modality, context, bias, time, duration, and integration of SGD topics, students' response, perspective, and implementation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incorporating inclusive language in healthcare education allows learners to develop holistic communication skills. Adhering to principles of linguistic equity in healthcare, specific to sex- and gender-inclusive language (SGIL), creates a safe environment for all participants. Anatomy education introduces students to a standard, consistent language used in healthcare. This report presents data from the 2022 Experimental Biology conference roundtable discussion regarding the use of SGIL in anatomy education. Most of the respondents had defined sex (i.e. male/female; 83%) and gender (i.e. man/woman; 66.7%) for their learners since 2018 (67.4%). Most often, sex- and gender-diverse (SGD) topics are discussed during the pelvis, perineum, and reproduction content (50%). While teaching teams and departments have made attempts, most believe the current use of SGIL is inconsistent (66.7%). Although there is no consensus on best practice, a few recommendations emerged, including (1) early integration of linguistic equity, (2) patient-centered educational interventions, and (3) multi-level discussions. These data and recommendations should be treated as a pilot for future research. Future studies should investigate anatomy educators' use of SGIL, including modality, context, bias, time, duration, and integration of SGD topics, students' response, perspective, and implementation in clinical practice.

语言公平:解剖学、教育家和包容性语言。
在医疗保健教育中融入包容性语言可以培养学习者的整体沟通技巧。坚持医疗保健中的语言平等原则,特别是性别和性别包容性语言(SGIL),为所有参与者创造一个安全的环境。解剖学教育向学生介绍医疗保健中使用的标准、一致的语言。本报告介绍了2022年实验生物学会议圆桌讨论中关于SGIL在解剖学教育中的应用的数据。大多数受访者已明确性别(即男/女;83%)和性别(即男性/女性;(66.7%),自2018年以来(67.4%)。大多数情况下,性别和性别多样性(SGD)的话题是在骨盆、会阴和生殖内容(50%)时讨论的。虽然教学团队和院系都进行了尝试,但大多数人认为目前SGIL的使用不一致(66.7%)。尽管在最佳实践上没有达成共识,但出现了一些建议,包括:(1)早期整合语言公平,(2)以患者为中心的教育干预,以及(3)多层次讨论。这些数据和建议应被视为未来研究的试点。未来的研究应该调查解剖学教育者使用SGIL的情况,包括方式、背景、偏见、时间、持续时间、SGD主题的整合、学生的反应、观点和在临床实践中的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信