Mental health during and after the COVID-19 pandemic - a longitudinal study over 42 months in five European countries.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Irina Zrnić Novaković, Dean Ajduković, Marina Ajduković, Laura Kenntemich, Annett Lotzin, Ingo Schäfer, Xenia Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous, Eleftheria Evgeniou, Camila Borges, Margarida Figueiredo-Braga, Moritz Russo, Brigitte Lueger-Schuster
{"title":"Mental health during and after the COVID-19 pandemic - a longitudinal study over 42 months in five European countries.","authors":"Irina Zrnić Novaković, Dean Ajduković, Marina Ajduković, Laura Kenntemich, Annett Lotzin, Ingo Schäfer, Xenia Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous, Eleftheria Evgeniou, Camila Borges, Margarida Figueiredo-Braga, Moritz Russo, Brigitte Lueger-Schuster","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2488700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is well documented. However, only a few studies investigated mental health in later phases of the pandemic and after its official end. Moreover, little is known about people's psychological burden related to the pandemic and other global crises post-pandemic.<b>Objective:</b> Study's first objective was to compare mental health outcomes in the general population over the course of the pandemic and ten months post-pandemic. The second objective was to explore people's psychological burden regarding the pandemic, in comparison to current wars, climate crises, inflation, and poor government management and/or corruption in the post-pandemic era.<b>Method:</b> Participants from the general population of Austria, Croatia, Germany, Greece, and Portugal (68.8% female, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 41.55) were assessed online up to four times between June 2020 and March 2024 (baseline sample: <i>N</i> = 7913). <i>Adjustment Disorder New Module - 8</i> (ADNM-8), <i>Patient Health Questionnaire</i> (PHQ-2), and <i>World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index</i> (WHO-5) were used to measure adjustment disorder, depression, and well-being. Prevalence rates were calculated and repeated measures ANOVAs applied to assess mental health at four time points. One-way repeated measures ANOVA was run to explore how the different global crises were related to participants' burden.<b>Results:</b> Temporal variations in mental health were evident across four assessment waves, with highest levels of probable adjustment disorder and depression in winter 2020/2021 (T2). A slight improvement of mental health was found at later time points. Current wars and inflation were the greatest sources of psychological burden at the post-pandemic assessment, revealing some cross-country differences.<b>Conclusion:</b> Although mental health differences in the general population were not as pronounced as in the acute phase of the pandemic, psychosocial support is still needed post-pandemic. This is likely to be due to other global crises that take a toll on people's mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2488700"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2488700","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is well documented. However, only a few studies investigated mental health in later phases of the pandemic and after its official end. Moreover, little is known about people's psychological burden related to the pandemic and other global crises post-pandemic.Objective: Study's first objective was to compare mental health outcomes in the general population over the course of the pandemic and ten months post-pandemic. The second objective was to explore people's psychological burden regarding the pandemic, in comparison to current wars, climate crises, inflation, and poor government management and/or corruption in the post-pandemic era.Method: Participants from the general population of Austria, Croatia, Germany, Greece, and Portugal (68.8% female, Mage = 41.55) were assessed online up to four times between June 2020 and March 2024 (baseline sample: N = 7913). Adjustment Disorder New Module - 8 (ADNM-8), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), and World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) were used to measure adjustment disorder, depression, and well-being. Prevalence rates were calculated and repeated measures ANOVAs applied to assess mental health at four time points. One-way repeated measures ANOVA was run to explore how the different global crises were related to participants' burden.Results: Temporal variations in mental health were evident across four assessment waves, with highest levels of probable adjustment disorder and depression in winter 2020/2021 (T2). A slight improvement of mental health was found at later time points. Current wars and inflation were the greatest sources of psychological burden at the post-pandemic assessment, revealing some cross-country differences.Conclusion: Although mental health differences in the general population were not as pronounced as in the acute phase of the pandemic, psychosocial support is still needed post-pandemic. This is likely to be due to other global crises that take a toll on people's mental health.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行期间和之后的心理健康——一项在五个欧洲国家进行的为期42个月的纵向研究。
背景:COVID-19大流行对心理健康的影响有据可查。然而,只有少数研究调查了大流行后期和正式结束后的心理健康状况。此外,人们对与大流行和大流行后的其他全球危机相关的心理负担知之甚少。目的:研究的第一个目标是比较大流行期间和大流行后10个月普通人群的心理健康结果。第二个目标是探讨与当前战争、气候危机、通货膨胀以及大流行后时代政府管理不善和/或腐败相比,人们对大流行的心理负担。方法:在2020年6月至2024年3月期间,对来自奥地利、克罗地亚、德国、希腊和葡萄牙的普通人群(68.8%为女性,年龄为41.55)的参与者进行了多达四次的在线评估(基线样本:N = 7913)。采用适应障碍新模块-8 (ADNM-8)、患者健康问卷(PHQ-2)和世界卫生组织五幸福感指数(WHO-5)来衡量适应障碍、抑郁和幸福感。计算患病率,并应用重复测量方差分析评估四个时间点的心理健康状况。采用单向重复测量方差分析来探讨不同的全球危机如何与参与者的负担相关。结果:心理健康的时间变化在四个评估波中都很明显,在2020/2021冬季(T2)可能出现的适应障碍和抑郁水平最高。在后来的时间点上发现心理健康略有改善。在大流行后评估中,当前的战争和通货膨胀是心理负担的最大来源,显示出一些跨国差异。结论:虽然普通人群的心理健康差异不像大流行急性期那样明显,但大流行后仍需要社会心理支持。这很可能是由于其他全球性危机对人们的心理健康造成了损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信