Imaging characteristics and clinical outcomes of spontaneous celiac artery dissection.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Rika Yoshida, Hisatoshi Araki, Takeshi Yoshizako, Yasushi Kaji
{"title":"Imaging characteristics and clinical outcomes of spontaneous celiac artery dissection.","authors":"Rika Yoshida, Hisatoshi Araki, Takeshi Yoshizako, Yasushi Kaji","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04961-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Spontaneous celiac artery dissection (CeAD) is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain. This study examined computed tomography (CT) scan findings, natural course, and outcomes of spontaneous CeAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients who underwent CT scan and were diagnosed with CeAD between April 2003 and June 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with aortic dissection (n = 25), iatrogenic CeAD (n = 6), traumatic CeAD (n = 1), and celiac artery (CeA) aneurysm (n = 4) and those undergoing noncontrast-enhanced CT scans (n = 1) were excluded. The remaining 23 consecutive patients were divided into the acute symptomatic and chronic asymptomatic CeAD groups. Correlations between CT classification, treatment, and outcomes were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen (78.2%) patients had hypertension requiring treatment. Of 23 patients, 18 were asymptomatic, and five had CeAD-related abdominal pain requiring hospitalization. Two had intraperitoneal bleeding. All hospitalized patients initially received conservative treatment. Upon the initial diagnosis, the mean CeA maximum outer diameter was 11.0 mm (range: 7-16). Ten (43.5%) patients had stenosis at the CeA origin. Based on CT findings from initial diagnosis to final follow-up, the outer diameter remained stable. CT showed that chronic CeAD was mostly Kim classification type IA or IB. In symptomatic patients, the dissection length on initial CT significantly decreased by final CT. No follow-up symptoms were related to CeAD, and the condition remained stable. No patients required vascular repair or surgery, and there were no deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spontaneous CeAD, asymptomatic and symptomatic, remained stable in imaging and clinical outcomes with conservative treatment. The Kim classification on CT plays a key role in identifying chronic CeAD, mostly type IA or IB.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04961-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Spontaneous celiac artery dissection (CeAD) is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain. This study examined computed tomography (CT) scan findings, natural course, and outcomes of spontaneous CeAD.

Methods: Sixty patients who underwent CT scan and were diagnosed with CeAD between April 2003 and June 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with aortic dissection (n = 25), iatrogenic CeAD (n = 6), traumatic CeAD (n = 1), and celiac artery (CeA) aneurysm (n = 4) and those undergoing noncontrast-enhanced CT scans (n = 1) were excluded. The remaining 23 consecutive patients were divided into the acute symptomatic and chronic asymptomatic CeAD groups. Correlations between CT classification, treatment, and outcomes were investigated.

Results: Eighteen (78.2%) patients had hypertension requiring treatment. Of 23 patients, 18 were asymptomatic, and five had CeAD-related abdominal pain requiring hospitalization. Two had intraperitoneal bleeding. All hospitalized patients initially received conservative treatment. Upon the initial diagnosis, the mean CeA maximum outer diameter was 11.0 mm (range: 7-16). Ten (43.5%) patients had stenosis at the CeA origin. Based on CT findings from initial diagnosis to final follow-up, the outer diameter remained stable. CT showed that chronic CeAD was mostly Kim classification type IA or IB. In symptomatic patients, the dissection length on initial CT significantly decreased by final CT. No follow-up symptoms were related to CeAD, and the condition remained stable. No patients required vascular repair or surgery, and there were no deaths.

Conclusion: Spontaneous CeAD, asymptomatic and symptomatic, remained stable in imaging and clinical outcomes with conservative treatment. The Kim classification on CT plays a key role in identifying chronic CeAD, mostly type IA or IB.

自发性腹腔动脉夹层的影像学特点及临床转归。
目的:自发性腹腔动脉夹层(CeAD)是一种罕见的急性腹痛原因。本研究检查了自发性脑炎的CT扫描结果、自然病程和预后。方法:回顾性分析2003年4月至2023年6月间60例经CT扫描诊断为CeAD的患者。排除了主动脉夹层(n = 25)、医源性CeAD (n = 6)、外伤性CeAD (n = 1)、腹腔动脉(CeA)动脉瘤(n = 4)和行非增强CT扫描(n = 1)的患者。其余23例连续患者分为急性症状组和慢性无症状组。探讨CT分型、治疗方法及预后的相关性。结果:18例(78.2%)患者有高血压需要治疗。在23例患者中,18例无症状,5例有与头痛相关的腹痛需要住院治疗。2例腹腔出血。所有住院患者最初均接受保守治疗。初诊时,CeA平均最大外径为11.0 mm(范围7-16)。10例(43.5%)患者在CeA起源处有狭窄。从最初诊断到最终随访的CT表现来看,外径保持稳定。CT显示慢性CeAD多为Kim分型IA型或IB型,有症状者初始CT解剖长度较终CT明显缩短。随访无与CeAD相关的症状,病情保持稳定。没有患者需要血管修复或手术,也没有患者死亡。结论:自发性脑炎,无症状,经保守治疗,影像学及临床预后稳定。CT上的Kim分型在诊断慢性CeAD中起关键作用,多为IA型或IB型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信