One-Year Efficacy of Guselkumab Versus Advanced Therapies for the Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Tim Disher, Dominik Naessens, Myrlene Sanon, Ashley Bonner, Jenna Ellis, Meaghan Bartlett, Becky Hooper, Zijiang Yang, Jessica R. Allegretti, Axel Dignass
{"title":"One-Year Efficacy of Guselkumab Versus Advanced Therapies for the Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis","authors":"Tim Disher,&nbsp;Dominik Naessens,&nbsp;Myrlene Sanon,&nbsp;Ashley Bonner,&nbsp;Jenna Ellis,&nbsp;Meaghan Bartlett,&nbsp;Becky Hooper,&nbsp;Zijiang Yang,&nbsp;Jessica R. Allegretti,&nbsp;Axel Dignass","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03183-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study used network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the comparative efficacy of available advanced therapies for moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease (CD) versus the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of advanced therapies in moderately to severely active CD. Bayesian NMAs were conducted for outcomes of clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, and a combined outcome of clinical remission with endoscopic response, at the end of the maintenance phase (up to 1 year). Primary analyses included patients with varied prior inadequate treatment responses, with additional analyses conducted for specific subgroups. Re-randomized trials were normalized in several cases to mimic a standard treat-through design, incorporating data from additional sources, when necessary, for patients who had an inadequate response or experienced a delayed response following induction.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 58 RCTs identified, 13 with maintenance endpoint data were ultimately included in the NMAs. Guselkumab 100 mg and 200 mg were more likely to be effective versus several comparators. Guselkumab 200 mg demonstrated significantly greater efficacy versus infliximab 10 mg/kg every 8 weeks and upadacitinib 30 mg daily for clinical response and clinical remission. For endoscopic response, guselkumab 200 mg showed significantly greater efficacy than ustekinumab, adalimumab, and upadacitinib. Significance was also noted versus ustekinumab on the combined outcome of clinical remission with endoscopic response. Similarly, guselkumab 100 mg demonstrated efficacy versus comparators across analyses. Guselkumab achieved higher rankings based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Findings of primary analyses within mixed populations were generally corroborated by subpopulation analyses.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results of this NMA in moderately to severely active CD indicate a higher likelihood of guselkumab achieving each clinical and endoscopic endpoint analyzed at the end of the maintenance phase versus other advanced therapies assessed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 6","pages":"2708 - 2727"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03183-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03183-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study used network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the comparative efficacy of available advanced therapies for moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease (CD) versus the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of advanced therapies in moderately to severely active CD. Bayesian NMAs were conducted for outcomes of clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, and a combined outcome of clinical remission with endoscopic response, at the end of the maintenance phase (up to 1 year). Primary analyses included patients with varied prior inadequate treatment responses, with additional analyses conducted for specific subgroups. Re-randomized trials were normalized in several cases to mimic a standard treat-through design, incorporating data from additional sources, when necessary, for patients who had an inadequate response or experienced a delayed response following induction.

Results

Of the 58 RCTs identified, 13 with maintenance endpoint data were ultimately included in the NMAs. Guselkumab 100 mg and 200 mg were more likely to be effective versus several comparators. Guselkumab 200 mg demonstrated significantly greater efficacy versus infliximab 10 mg/kg every 8 weeks and upadacitinib 30 mg daily for clinical response and clinical remission. For endoscopic response, guselkumab 200 mg showed significantly greater efficacy than ustekinumab, adalimumab, and upadacitinib. Significance was also noted versus ustekinumab on the combined outcome of clinical remission with endoscopic response. Similarly, guselkumab 100 mg demonstrated efficacy versus comparators across analyses. Guselkumab achieved higher rankings based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Findings of primary analyses within mixed populations were generally corroborated by subpopulation analyses.

Conclusion

Results of this NMA in moderately to severely active CD indicate a higher likelihood of guselkumab achieving each clinical and endoscopic endpoint analyzed at the end of the maintenance phase versus other advanced therapies assessed.

Guselkumab与先进疗法治疗中度至重度活动性克罗恩病的一年疗效:网络荟萃分析
本研究使用网络荟萃分析(NMA)来评估现有先进疗法治疗中度至重度活动性克罗恩病(CD)与IL-23抑制剂guselkumab的比较疗效。方法:进行系统的文献综述,以确定中重度活动性CD的先进治疗方法的随机对照试验(rct)。在维持期结束时(长达1年),对临床反应、临床缓解、内镜反应以及临床缓解与内镜反应的联合结果进行贝叶斯NMAs。主要分析包括不同先前治疗反应不足的患者,并对特定亚组进行了额外的分析。在几个病例中,重新随机试验规范化,以模仿标准的通过治疗设计,必要时,纳入来自其他来源的数据,用于诱导后反应不足或反应延迟的患者。结果:在鉴定的58项随机对照试验中,13项具有维持终点数据的试验最终被纳入nma。100mg和200mg的Guselkumab比几种比较药更有可能有效。在临床反应和临床缓解方面,Guselkumab 200mg的疗效明显优于英夫利昔单抗10mg /kg / 8周和upadacitinib 30mg /天。对于内镜反应,guselkumab 200mg的疗效显著高于ustekinumab、adalimumab和upadacitinib。与ustekinumab相比,临床缓解和内镜反应的综合结果也具有重要意义。同样,guselkumab 100mg在分析中与比较物相比显示出疗效。Guselkumab在累积排名曲线下的基于表面的排名更高。混合群体内的初步分析结果通常得到亚群体分析的证实。结论:该NMA在中度至重度活动性CD中的结果表明,与评估的其他先进疗法相比,guselkumab在维持期结束时达到每个临床和内镜终点的可能性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信