Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccination Among Unvaccinated and Under-Vaccinated African American/Black and Latine Frontline Essential Workers: A Qualitative Exploration.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Marya Gwadz, Jennifer A Robinson, Fernanda Gonzalez Blanco Serrano, Stephanie Campos, Robin M Freeman, Rauly Chero, Charles M Cleland, Lalitha Parameswaran, Robert L Hawkins, Prema Filippone, Maria Lizardo, Greg Bangser, Paola G Ramirez, Andrea Negret, Mehreen Kagzi, Hanna Lissinna
{"title":"Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccination Among Unvaccinated and Under-Vaccinated African American/Black and Latine Frontline Essential Workers: A Qualitative Exploration.","authors":"Marya Gwadz, Jennifer A Robinson, Fernanda Gonzalez Blanco Serrano, Stephanie Campos, Robin M Freeman, Rauly Chero, Charles M Cleland, Lalitha Parameswaran, Robert L Hawkins, Prema Filippone, Maria Lizardo, Greg Bangser, Paola G Ramirez, Andrea Negret, Mehreen Kagzi, Hanna Lissinna","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04708-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 morbidity and mortality are serious in the United States, particularly among African American/Black and Latine (AABL) populations. Staying up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccination is essential for mitigating risk, but AABL vaccination rates are low. The present qualitative study explores perspectives on COVID-19 among AABL persons at high-risk for exposure to the SARS-CoV- 2 virus: frontline essential workers engaged in public-facing professions (e.g., retail). From a larger study of AABL frontline essential workers not up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccination, N = 50 participants were purposively sampled for maximum variability. Participants engaged in semi-structured qualitative interviews in English or Spanish that were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and translated into English as needed. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach that was both inductive and theory-driven. Participants were 37 years old, on average, and most (65%) were men. Approximately half (56%) were Latine/Hispanic and 44% were African American/Black. Occupations included food preparation (40%), retail (28%), construction (12%), in-home health care (8%), and building maintenance and personal services (12%). Approximately a third (38%) had received ≥ 1 COVID-19 vaccine dose. We found COVID-19 vaccination perspectives were grounded in a larger context of medical and institutional distrust and past/ongoing systemic racism. In this context, results were organized into the following themes: general perspectives on COVID-19; barriers/facilitators related to race/ethnicity, social class, and community; specific aspects of the COVID-19 vaccine as barriers; mandates, incentives, and pressures to be vaccinated; and mixed effects of public health initiatives. Overall, participants were knowledgeable about COVID-19. Social norms reduced vaccine intentions but altruism and community/family concern could motivate it. Aspects of the public health response (e.g., advertisement campaigns targeting AABL populations) increased distrust and reduced vaccination willingness. However, at least some ambivalence about vaccination was common (participants would consider it). Yet there was a large gap between considering and receiving vaccination. Thus, barriers to COVID-19 vaccination for AABL frontline essential workers operate at multiple levels of influence, but are addressable. The present study yields recommendations to improve vaccination, including increasing the trustworthiness of systems and institutions, reducing systemic/structural barriers, harnessing social forces, and engaging AABL communities in program planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04708-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 morbidity and mortality are serious in the United States, particularly among African American/Black and Latine (AABL) populations. Staying up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccination is essential for mitigating risk, but AABL vaccination rates are low. The present qualitative study explores perspectives on COVID-19 among AABL persons at high-risk for exposure to the SARS-CoV- 2 virus: frontline essential workers engaged in public-facing professions (e.g., retail). From a larger study of AABL frontline essential workers not up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccination, N = 50 participants were purposively sampled for maximum variability. Participants engaged in semi-structured qualitative interviews in English or Spanish that were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and translated into English as needed. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach that was both inductive and theory-driven. Participants were 37 years old, on average, and most (65%) were men. Approximately half (56%) were Latine/Hispanic and 44% were African American/Black. Occupations included food preparation (40%), retail (28%), construction (12%), in-home health care (8%), and building maintenance and personal services (12%). Approximately a third (38%) had received ≥ 1 COVID-19 vaccine dose. We found COVID-19 vaccination perspectives were grounded in a larger context of medical and institutional distrust and past/ongoing systemic racism. In this context, results were organized into the following themes: general perspectives on COVID-19; barriers/facilitators related to race/ethnicity, social class, and community; specific aspects of the COVID-19 vaccine as barriers; mandates, incentives, and pressures to be vaccinated; and mixed effects of public health initiatives. Overall, participants were knowledgeable about COVID-19. Social norms reduced vaccine intentions but altruism and community/family concern could motivate it. Aspects of the public health response (e.g., advertisement campaigns targeting AABL populations) increased distrust and reduced vaccination willingness. However, at least some ambivalence about vaccination was common (participants would consider it). Yet there was a large gap between considering and receiving vaccination. Thus, barriers to COVID-19 vaccination for AABL frontline essential workers operate at multiple levels of influence, but are addressable. The present study yields recommendations to improve vaccination, including increasing the trustworthiness of systems and institutions, reducing systemic/structural barriers, harnessing social forces, and engaging AABL communities in program planning.

未接种疫苗和接种不足的非洲裔美国人/黑人和拉丁裔一线基本工作者的COVID-19疫苗接种前景:定性探索。
在美国,COVID-19发病率和死亡率的种族/族裔差异严重,特别是在非洲裔美国人/黑人和拉丁裔(AABL)人群中。及时了解COVID-19疫苗接种情况对于降低风险至关重要,但甲型h1n1流感疫苗接种率很低。本定性研究探讨了接触SARS-CoV- 2病毒高风险的AABL人群中COVID-19的观点:从事面向公众的职业(如零售)的一线必要工作者。在一项针对AABL一线必要工作人员的更大规模研究中,有针对性地抽样了N = 50名参与者,以获得最大的可变性。参与者用英语或西班牙语进行半结构化的定性访谈,录音,专业转录,并根据需要翻译成英语。数据分析使用直接的内容分析方法,既归纳和理论驱动。参与者的平均年龄为37岁,大多数(65%)是男性。大约一半(56%)是拉丁裔/西班牙裔,44%是非裔美国人/黑人。职业包括食品准备(40%)、零售(28%)、建筑(12%)、家庭医疗保健(8%)以及建筑维护和个人服务(12%)。约三分之一(38%)接种了≥1剂COVID-19疫苗。我们发现,COVID-19疫苗接种的观点是建立在医疗和机构不信任以及过去/现在的系统性种族主义的更大背景下的。在此背景下,调查结果分为以下主题:对COVID-19的总体看法;与种族/民族、社会阶层和社区有关的障碍/促进因素;COVID-19疫苗的具体方面是障碍;要求接种疫苗的任务、激励措施和压力;以及公共卫生倡议的混合效应。总体而言,参与者对COVID-19有所了解。社会规范减少了疫苗的意向,但利他主义和社区/家庭的关注可能会激发疫苗的意向。公共卫生应对的某些方面(例如,针对AABL人群的广告宣传活动)增加了不信任,降低了接种意愿。然而,至少一些关于疫苗接种的矛盾心理是常见的(参与者会考虑到这一点)。然而,在考虑接种疫苗和接种疫苗之间存在很大差距。因此,AABL一线基本工作人员接种COVID-19疫苗的障碍在多个层面上产生影响,但是可以解决的。目前的研究提出了改善疫苗接种的建议,包括提高系统和机构的可信度,减少系统/结构性障碍,利用社会力量,并使AABL社区参与规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信