Empowerment among treatment-engaged individuals living with schizophrenia in Tanzania.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Madeline Jin Van Husen, Sylvia Kaaya, Praxeda Swai, Paul Sarea Lawala, Beatrice Thadei, Anna Minja, Jennifer Headley, Joseph R Egger, Joy Noel Baumgartner
{"title":"Empowerment among treatment-engaged individuals living with schizophrenia in Tanzania.","authors":"Madeline Jin Van Husen, Sylvia Kaaya, Praxeda Swai, Paul Sarea Lawala, Beatrice Thadei, Anna Minja, Jennifer Headley, Joseph R Egger, Joy Noel Baumgartner","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06700-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As low-resource settings move to address the treatment and social service gap for people living with schizophrenia (PLWS), person-centered and recovery-oriented interventions should monitor impacts on empowerment. This study explores empowerment and associated factors among PLWS in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses endline data from the Culturally Adapted Family Psychoeducation for Adults with Psychotic Disorders in Tanzania (KUPAA) pilot trial. Participants included 66 dyads of PLWS and caregivers recruited from two tertiary-level hospitals. The main outcome variable of interest was empowerment (Rogers 28-item Empowerment Scale), and the main exposure variable was Participation in Society (Domain 6 of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0). Key psychosocial correlates of interest included hopefulness, general self-efficacy, internalized stigma, and family functioning. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to explore variable relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 21 women and 40 men with a mean age of 32 years. Bivariate analyses revealed greater participation in society (p < 0.0003) was correlated with greater empowerment, higher hopefulness (p < 0.0001) and higher self-efficacy (p < 0.0001). Lower empowerment was correlated with higher self-stigma (p < 0.0001) and worse family functioning (p < .001). Multivariable models indicated more participation in society was associated with higher empowerment, but when hope, self-efficacy, internalized stigma, and/or family functioning were added to the models, those factors were more strongly correlated with empowerment than participation in society.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Empowerment is increasingly being recognized as an important outcome of psychosocial interventions. Understanding empowerment and its possible effects on recovery-centered outcomes is important when thinking of future interventions for PLWS in low-resource settings. Future recovery-oriented interventions and research should both consider including empowerment measurement among PLWS and incorporate their lived experiences in psychosocial treatment programming.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"422"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06700-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: As low-resource settings move to address the treatment and social service gap for people living with schizophrenia (PLWS), person-centered and recovery-oriented interventions should monitor impacts on empowerment. This study explores empowerment and associated factors among PLWS in Tanzania.

Methods: This study uses endline data from the Culturally Adapted Family Psychoeducation for Adults with Psychotic Disorders in Tanzania (KUPAA) pilot trial. Participants included 66 dyads of PLWS and caregivers recruited from two tertiary-level hospitals. The main outcome variable of interest was empowerment (Rogers 28-item Empowerment Scale), and the main exposure variable was Participation in Society (Domain 6 of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0). Key psychosocial correlates of interest included hopefulness, general self-efficacy, internalized stigma, and family functioning. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to explore variable relationships.

Results: There were 21 women and 40 men with a mean age of 32 years. Bivariate analyses revealed greater participation in society (p < 0.0003) was correlated with greater empowerment, higher hopefulness (p < 0.0001) and higher self-efficacy (p < 0.0001). Lower empowerment was correlated with higher self-stigma (p < 0.0001) and worse family functioning (p < .001). Multivariable models indicated more participation in society was associated with higher empowerment, but when hope, self-efficacy, internalized stigma, and/or family functioning were added to the models, those factors were more strongly correlated with empowerment than participation in society.

Conclusion: Empowerment is increasingly being recognized as an important outcome of psychosocial interventions. Understanding empowerment and its possible effects on recovery-centered outcomes is important when thinking of future interventions for PLWS in low-resource settings. Future recovery-oriented interventions and research should both consider including empowerment measurement among PLWS and incorporate their lived experiences in psychosocial treatment programming.

坦桑尼亚接受治疗的精神分裂症患者的赋权。
目的:随着资源匮乏的环境逐渐解决精神分裂症患者的治疗和社会服务差距,以人为本和以康复为导向的干预措施应监测对赋权的影响。本研究探讨了坦桑尼亚PLWS的赋权及其相关因素。方法:本研究使用来自坦桑尼亚精神障碍成人文化适应家庭心理教育(KUPAA)试点试验的终线数据。参与者包括从两家三级医院招募的66对PLWS和护理人员。主要结果变量为赋权(Rogers 28项赋权量表),主要暴露变量为社会参与(WHO残疾评估表,WHODAS 2.0领域6)。兴趣的主要社会心理相关因素包括希望、一般自我效能、内化耻辱和家庭功能。使用双变量和多变量分析来探索变量关系。结果:女性21例,男性40例,平均年龄32岁。双变量分析揭示了更多的社会参与(p结论:赋权越来越被认为是社会心理干预的重要结果。在考虑未来对低资源环境中PLWS的干预措施时,理解赋权及其对以恢复为中心的结果的可能影响非常重要。未来以康复为导向的干预和研究应考虑在PLWS中纳入赋权测量,并将他们的生活经验纳入社会心理治疗规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信