Cecilia E Kaufman, Margaret C Morrissey-Basler, Monique Marcelino, Douglas J Casa
{"title":"The Effects of Body Cooling Strategies on Physiological and Performance Outcomes During Simulated Occupational Work in the Heat.","authors":"Cecilia E Kaufman, Margaret C Morrissey-Basler, Monique Marcelino, Douglas J Casa","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Body cooling is a low-cost heat strain mitigation strategy to effectively reduce heat strain and enhance work performance. However, data on the efficacy of body cooling strategies remains limited. We aimed to examine the effects of body cooling with cooling garments on physiological, perceptual, and performance outcomes during simulated work in the heat in men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen physically active participants (seven men and seven women; age: 26 ± 3 years, peak oxygen consumption [VO<sub>2</sub>peak]: 42.7 ± 7.9 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>) completed two randomized control trials in a hot, humid environment (40°C, 40% relative humidity). During the body cooling trial (COOL), participants wore cooling garments (hat, sleeves, neck gaiter), and large cooling towels during rest breaks. There was no cooling intervention in the control trial (CON). Rectal temperature (T<sub>REC</sub>), skin temperature (T<sub>SK</sub>), and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously. Performance outcomes included the number of boxes lifted during the trial (BOX) and the time to complete 25 repetitions (TT25) post-trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant interaction between trial and activity with COOL reporting overall lower T<sub>REC</sub> (CON: 38.40 ± 0.46°C; COOL: 38.08 ± 0.31°C; p < 0.001), T<sub>SK</sub> (CON: 37.20 ± 0.72°C; COOL: 35.52 ± 1.52°C; p < 0.001), and HR (CON: 145 ± 17 bpm; COOL: 133 ± 24 bpm; p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between the number of boxes lifted and trial during BOX 1 and 3 (BOX 1: p = 0.010; BOX 3: p = 0.001). Significant differences between mean TT25 (CON: 169 ± 34 s; COOL: 149 ± 32 s; p = 0.011) were reported between trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Body cooling garments reduced physiological responses while improving performance during simulated work in heat and should be considered an effective, low-cost strategy to protect laborers from heat strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Body cooling is a low-cost heat strain mitigation strategy to effectively reduce heat strain and enhance work performance. However, data on the efficacy of body cooling strategies remains limited. We aimed to examine the effects of body cooling with cooling garments on physiological, perceptual, and performance outcomes during simulated work in the heat in men and women.
Methods: Fourteen physically active participants (seven men and seven women; age: 26 ± 3 years, peak oxygen consumption [VO2peak]: 42.7 ± 7.9 mL kg-1 min-1) completed two randomized control trials in a hot, humid environment (40°C, 40% relative humidity). During the body cooling trial (COOL), participants wore cooling garments (hat, sleeves, neck gaiter), and large cooling towels during rest breaks. There was no cooling intervention in the control trial (CON). Rectal temperature (TREC), skin temperature (TSK), and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously. Performance outcomes included the number of boxes lifted during the trial (BOX) and the time to complete 25 repetitions (TT25) post-trial.
Results: There was a significant interaction between trial and activity with COOL reporting overall lower TREC (CON: 38.40 ± 0.46°C; COOL: 38.08 ± 0.31°C; p < 0.001), TSK (CON: 37.20 ± 0.72°C; COOL: 35.52 ± 1.52°C; p < 0.001), and HR (CON: 145 ± 17 bpm; COOL: 133 ± 24 bpm; p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between the number of boxes lifted and trial during BOX 1 and 3 (BOX 1: p = 0.010; BOX 3: p = 0.001). Significant differences between mean TT25 (CON: 169 ± 34 s; COOL: 149 ± 32 s; p = 0.011) were reported between trials.
Conclusion: Body cooling garments reduced physiological responses while improving performance during simulated work in heat and should be considered an effective, low-cost strategy to protect laborers from heat strain.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.