A review on exploration-exploitation trade-off in psychiatric disorders.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Ali Jami, Sajjad Abbaszade, Abdol-Hossein Vahabie
{"title":"A review on exploration-exploitation trade-off in psychiatric disorders.","authors":"Ali Jami, Sajjad Abbaszade, Abdol-Hossein Vahabie","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06837-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Balancing exploration and exploitation is a crucial aspect of adaptive decision-making, but psychiatric disorders can disrupt this balance in various ways, shedding light on their neurocognitive roots and guiding targeted interventions. In this systematic review, we aimed to delineate potential exploration-exploitation impairments across psychiatric disorders. Through a thorough search on PubMed, we identified forty-six relevant studies employing tasks probing exploration-exploitation balances, which we synthesized to reveal distinct patterns. These disorders are clustered into three categories: addictive patterns, emotional/cognitive disturbances, and neurological (neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative) disorders. Our findings show that anxiety and mood disorders often enhance exploratory behaviors, while depression impact decision stability and reward sensitivity. In contrast, schizophrenia, OCD (Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder), and ADHD (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder) are characterized by excessive switching and difficulties in balancing exploration and exploitation, leading to impaired learning and adaptability. Additionally, disorders with addictive-like features disrupt optimal decision-making strategies by either heightening exploration or causing maladaptive persistence, thus skewing the balance away from effective decision-making. Individuals exhibiting addiction-like or compulsive behaviors often demonstrate imbalances in the explore-exploit trade-off, resulting in suboptimal decision-making characterized by reduced exploration, flawed foraging strategies, and impulsive or perseverative choices despite adverse outcomes. This suggests that such disorders may originate from dysfunctional foraging processes applied to decision-making. In sum, different patterns of exploration-exploitation balance in different disorders are crucial in understanding the difficulties in learning and decision making of neuropsychiatric disorders. This suggests that such disorders may stem from dysregulated decision-making processes, where uncertainty plays a central role. Dysfunctions in dopaminergic and noradrenergic pathways appear to disrupt the brain's representation of uncertainty, thereby altering exploratory behavior. In sum, the varying patterns of exploration-exploitation balance across different disorders are critical for understanding the challenges in learning and decision-making associated with neuropsychiatric conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06837-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Balancing exploration and exploitation is a crucial aspect of adaptive decision-making, but psychiatric disorders can disrupt this balance in various ways, shedding light on their neurocognitive roots and guiding targeted interventions. In this systematic review, we aimed to delineate potential exploration-exploitation impairments across psychiatric disorders. Through a thorough search on PubMed, we identified forty-six relevant studies employing tasks probing exploration-exploitation balances, which we synthesized to reveal distinct patterns. These disorders are clustered into three categories: addictive patterns, emotional/cognitive disturbances, and neurological (neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative) disorders. Our findings show that anxiety and mood disorders often enhance exploratory behaviors, while depression impact decision stability and reward sensitivity. In contrast, schizophrenia, OCD (Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder), and ADHD (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder) are characterized by excessive switching and difficulties in balancing exploration and exploitation, leading to impaired learning and adaptability. Additionally, disorders with addictive-like features disrupt optimal decision-making strategies by either heightening exploration or causing maladaptive persistence, thus skewing the balance away from effective decision-making. Individuals exhibiting addiction-like or compulsive behaviors often demonstrate imbalances in the explore-exploit trade-off, resulting in suboptimal decision-making characterized by reduced exploration, flawed foraging strategies, and impulsive or perseverative choices despite adverse outcomes. This suggests that such disorders may originate from dysfunctional foraging processes applied to decision-making. In sum, different patterns of exploration-exploitation balance in different disorders are crucial in understanding the difficulties in learning and decision making of neuropsychiatric disorders. This suggests that such disorders may stem from dysregulated decision-making processes, where uncertainty plays a central role. Dysfunctions in dopaminergic and noradrenergic pathways appear to disrupt the brain's representation of uncertainty, thereby altering exploratory behavior. In sum, the varying patterns of exploration-exploitation balance across different disorders are critical for understanding the challenges in learning and decision-making associated with neuropsychiatric conditions.

精神障碍的探索-利用权衡研究综述。
平衡探索和利用是适应性决策的关键方面,但精神疾病可以以各种方式破坏这种平衡,揭示其神经认知根源并指导有针对性的干预措施。在这篇系统综述中,我们旨在描述精神疾病中潜在的探索-利用障碍。通过对PubMed的彻底搜索,我们确定了46项相关研究,这些研究使用探索-利用平衡的任务,我们将其综合起来以揭示不同的模式。这些障碍可分为三类:成瘾模式、情绪/认知障碍和神经(神经发育和神经退行性)障碍。我们的研究结果表明,焦虑和情绪障碍通常会增强探索性行为,而抑郁则会影响决策稳定性和奖励敏感性。相比之下,精神分裂症、强迫症(OCD)和多动症(ADHD)的特点是过度转换,难以平衡探索和利用,导致学习和适应能力受损。此外,具有成瘾特征的疾病通过加强探索或引起不适应的持久性来破坏最佳决策策略,从而使平衡偏离有效决策。表现出成瘾或强迫行为的个体通常表现出探索-利用权衡的不平衡,导致次优决策,其特征是减少探索,有缺陷的觅食策略,以及冲动或坚持不懈的选择,尽管结果不利。这表明,这种疾病可能源于应用于决策的功能失调的觅食过程。综上所述,不同障碍的探索-利用平衡模式对理解神经精神障碍的学习和决策困难具有重要意义。这表明,这种疾病可能源于决策过程失调,其中不确定性起着核心作用。多巴胺能和去甲肾上腺素能通路的功能障碍似乎扰乱了大脑对不确定性的表征,从而改变了探索行为。总之,不同障碍之间探索-利用平衡的不同模式对于理解与神经精神疾病相关的学习和决策挑战至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信