Nationwide implementation and evaluation of the Tumor-First workflow for genetic testing in ovarian carcinoma.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Vera M Witjes, Joanne A de Hullu, Dorien M A Hermkens, Yvonne H C M Smolders, Julie E M Swillens, Sarah-Lotte Slob, Tjalling Bosse, Marian J E Mourits, Margreet G E M Ausems, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
{"title":"Nationwide implementation and evaluation of the Tumor-First workflow for genetic testing in ovarian carcinoma.","authors":"Vera M Witjes, Joanne A de Hullu, Dorien M A Hermkens, Yvonne H C M Smolders, Julie E M Swillens, Sarah-Lotte Slob, Tjalling Bosse, Marian J E Mourits, Margreet G E M Ausems, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite international agreement on the importance of tumor DNA testing and germline testing for determining PARP inhibitor treatment eligibility in patients with ovarian carcinoma (OC) and for cancer prevention in their relatives, the optimal strategy remains under debate. In the Netherlands, the \"Tumor-First workflow\" was initiated and implemented nationwide: a well-validated tumor DNA test is the primary test for detecting tumor pathogenic variants (PVs) in OC risk genes (BRCA1/2, RAD51C/D, BRIP1, PALB2). The detection of tumor PVs is subsequently used to stratify germline testing and determine treatment eligibility. The Tumor-First workflow is efficient and saves costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nationwide implementation of the Tumor-First workflow. We analyzed real-time genetic testing practices, including tumor DNA and germline testing, in patients diagnosed with OC from 2019 to 2023, as identified through the Dutch Pathology Registry (Palga). Testing data were collected from diagnostic pathology and genetic reports. Out of the 3926 OC patients, 2778 (71%) received OC tumor DNA testing as the primary test. Between 2019 and 2023, this percentage increased from 50% to 85%. Of these tumor DNA tests, 2703 (97%) were successful, with 398 (15%) resulting in the identification of a PV in an OC risk gene. Most of these patients (291; 73%) underwent germline testing, and 147 (51%) were found to have a germline PV. We conclude that the nationwide implementation of the Tumor-First workflow for OC was effective. Multidisciplinary efforts contributed to a more efficient detection of germline and somatic PVs in OC risk genes.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35440","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite international agreement on the importance of tumor DNA testing and germline testing for determining PARP inhibitor treatment eligibility in patients with ovarian carcinoma (OC) and for cancer prevention in their relatives, the optimal strategy remains under debate. In the Netherlands, the "Tumor-First workflow" was initiated and implemented nationwide: a well-validated tumor DNA test is the primary test for detecting tumor pathogenic variants (PVs) in OC risk genes (BRCA1/2, RAD51C/D, BRIP1, PALB2). The detection of tumor PVs is subsequently used to stratify germline testing and determine treatment eligibility. The Tumor-First workflow is efficient and saves costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nationwide implementation of the Tumor-First workflow. We analyzed real-time genetic testing practices, including tumor DNA and germline testing, in patients diagnosed with OC from 2019 to 2023, as identified through the Dutch Pathology Registry (Palga). Testing data were collected from diagnostic pathology and genetic reports. Out of the 3926 OC patients, 2778 (71%) received OC tumor DNA testing as the primary test. Between 2019 and 2023, this percentage increased from 50% to 85%. Of these tumor DNA tests, 2703 (97%) were successful, with 398 (15%) resulting in the identification of a PV in an OC risk gene. Most of these patients (291; 73%) underwent germline testing, and 147 (51%) were found to have a germline PV. We conclude that the nationwide implementation of the Tumor-First workflow for OC was effective. Multidisciplinary efforts contributed to a more efficient detection of germline and somatic PVs in OC risk genes.

卵巢癌基因检测肿瘤优先工作流程的全国实施和评估。
尽管国际上一致认为肿瘤DNA检测和种系检测对于确定卵巢癌(OC)患者PARP抑制剂治疗资格及其亲属癌症预防的重要性,但最佳策略仍在争论中。在荷兰,“肿瘤优先工作流程”被启动并在全国范围内实施:一种经过验证的肿瘤DNA检测是检测卵巢癌风险基因(BRCA1/2、RAD51C/D、BRIP1、PALB2)中肿瘤致病变异(pv)的主要方法。肿瘤pv的检测随后用于分层种系检测和确定治疗资格。肿瘤优先的工作流程效率高,节省成本。本研究的目的是评估肿瘤优先工作流程在全国范围内的实施情况。我们分析了通过荷兰病理学登记处(Palga)确定的2019年至2023年诊断为OC的患者的实时基因检测实践,包括肿瘤DNA和种系检测。检测数据收集自诊断病理和遗传报告。在3926例OC患者中,2778例(71%)接受了OC肿瘤DNA检测作为主要检测。从2019年到2023年,这一比例从50%上升到85%。在这些肿瘤DNA检测中,2703例(97%)成功,其中398例(15%)在卵巢癌风险基因中鉴定出PV。大多数患者(291例;73%)进行了种系检测,147例(51%)发现有种系PV。我们得出结论,肿瘤优先工作流程在全国范围内的实施是有效的。多学科的努力有助于更有效地检测OC风险基因中的种系和体细胞pv。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信