Detection and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Apolonia García-Patterson, Montserrat Balsells, Ivan Solà, Rosa Corcoy
{"title":"Detection and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Apolonia García-Patterson, Montserrat Balsells, Ivan Solà, Rosa Corcoy","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.04.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the impact of detection and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus on short-term maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. We defined 2 maternal (gestational diabetes prevalence and cesarean section) and 2 neonatal (preterm birth and macrosomia) primary outcomes. We also defined 5 maternal and 12 fetal-neonatal secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Ovid Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase since inception. The search was updated in November 2024.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials addressing detection and treatment of early gestational diabetes (diagnosed before 20 completed weeks).</p><p><strong>Exclusion criteria: </strong>pregestational diabetes or overt diabetes in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>The Cochrane Handbook was used to guide data extraction and interpretation including risk of bias assessment (Risk of Bias 2 tool). Aggregation and comparison of results were performed with Revman 5.4.1. Pooled relative risk and mean differences were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models. The quality of the evidence for primary outcomes was summarized using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1221 unique references. Seven articles addressing early gestational diabetes met the eligibility criteria with a total of 30,791 participants. These studies used 2 strategies: (1) treatment vs usual care of women with a diagnosis of early gestational diabetes and (2) population-based approaches, either performing screening (vs not) or using different cutoffs for diagnosis. In studies comparing treatment vs usual care, differences were observed only in secondary outcomes: more drug treatment, less maternal weight gain, lower birthweight, and less respiratory distress. In studies comparing different population-based strategies, primary outcomes differed for a higher rate of early and overall gestational diabetes (relative risk, 5.50; 95% confidence interval, 3.56-8.48 and 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.38, respectively) and a lower rate of primary cesarean section (relative risk, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.93); as to secondary outcomes, differences were observed in terms of higher total pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia. The quality of evidence for most outcomes was low/very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Detection and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus do not offer indisputable benefits either in treated women or at the population level. More studies are required to elucidate this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.04.059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the impact of detection and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus on short-term maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. We defined 2 maternal (gestational diabetes prevalence and cesarean section) and 2 neonatal (preterm birth and macrosomia) primary outcomes. We also defined 5 maternal and 12 fetal-neonatal secondary outcomes.

Data sources: Ovid Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase since inception. The search was updated in November 2024.

Study eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials addressing detection and treatment of early gestational diabetes (diagnosed before 20 completed weeks).

Exclusion criteria: pregestational diabetes or overt diabetes in pregnancy.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: The Cochrane Handbook was used to guide data extraction and interpretation including risk of bias assessment (Risk of Bias 2 tool). Aggregation and comparison of results were performed with Revman 5.4.1. Pooled relative risk and mean differences were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models. The quality of the evidence for primary outcomes was summarized using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.

Results: We identified 1221 unique references. Seven articles addressing early gestational diabetes met the eligibility criteria with a total of 30,791 participants. These studies used 2 strategies: (1) treatment vs usual care of women with a diagnosis of early gestational diabetes and (2) population-based approaches, either performing screening (vs not) or using different cutoffs for diagnosis. In studies comparing treatment vs usual care, differences were observed only in secondary outcomes: more drug treatment, less maternal weight gain, lower birthweight, and less respiratory distress. In studies comparing different population-based strategies, primary outcomes differed for a higher rate of early and overall gestational diabetes (relative risk, 5.50; 95% confidence interval, 3.56-8.48 and 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.38, respectively) and a lower rate of primary cesarean section (relative risk, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.93); as to secondary outcomes, differences were observed in terms of higher total pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia. The quality of evidence for most outcomes was low/very low.

Conclusion: Detection and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus do not offer indisputable benefits either in treated women or at the population level. More studies are required to elucidate this issue.

妊娠早期糖尿病的检测与治疗。随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:探讨妊娠早期糖尿病的发现和治疗对孕产妇、胎儿和新生儿短期预后的影响。我们定义了两个产妇(妊娠期糖尿病患病率和剖宫产)和两个新生儿(早产和巨大儿)的主要结局。我们还定义了5个产妇和12个胎儿新生儿的次要结局。数据来源:Ovid Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL和EMBASE。该搜索于2024年11月更新。研究资格标准:纳入标准:针对妊娠早期糖尿病(在20周前诊断)的检测和治疗的随机对照试验。排除标准:妊娠期糖尿病或妊娠期明显糖尿病。研究评价和综合方法:使用Cochrane手册指导数据提取和解释,包括偏倚风险评估(risk of bias 2工具)。采用Revman 5.4.1软件对结果进行汇总比较。使用随机效应模型以95%置信区间计算合并相对风险和平均差异。主要结局的证据质量采用GRADE标准进行总结。结果:共鉴定出1221篇唯一参考文献。7篇关于妊娠早期糖尿病的文章符合入选标准,共有30791名参与者。这些研究采用了两种策略:1)对诊断为妊娠早期糖尿病的妇女进行治疗与常规护理;2)基于人群的方法,要么进行筛查(与不筛查),要么使用不同的诊断截止值。在比较治疗与常规护理的研究中,只观察到次要结果的差异:更多的药物治疗,更少的母亲体重增加,更低的出生体重和更少的呼吸窘迫。在比较不同人群策略的研究中,早期和整体妊娠糖尿病发生率较高的主要结局不同(相对风险,5.50;95%置信区间分别为3.56 ~ 8.48和1.83;95%置信区间分别为1.41 ~ 2.38);初次剖宫产率较低(相对危险度,0.88;95%置信区间0.84-0.93);至于次要结局,在总妊娠高血压和先兆子痫方面观察到差异。大多数结果的证据质量低/非常低。结论:妊娠早期糖尿病的检测和治疗无论在治疗的妇女还是在人群水平上都不能提供无可争议的益处。需要更多的研究来阐明这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信