Sex differences in cancer mortality among solid organ transplant recipients.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Sarah S Jackson, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Erin Gardner, Mei-Chin Hsieh, Tabassum Insaf, Charles F Lynch, Bozena Morawski, Shuhui Wang, Kelly J Yu, Eric A Engels
{"title":"Sex differences in cancer mortality among solid organ transplant recipients.","authors":"Sarah S Jackson, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Erin Gardner, Mei-Chin Hsieh, Tabassum Insaf, Charles F Lynch, Bozena Morawski, Shuhui Wang, Kelly J Yu, Eric A Engels","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Males have increased mortality after a cancer diagnosis than females, possibly due to poorer immunosurveillance. We tested whether the female survival advantage is lost with immunosuppression by evaluating 17,048 cancer patients (68% male) with a prior solid organ transplant using data from the US Transplant Cancer Match Study and 1,221,914 cancer patients (58% male) from the general population using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. We evaluated 13 solid cancers that occur in both sexes. We compared mortality due to cancer in males and females using a male:female hazard ratio (M:F HR) derived from Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, diagnosis year, stage, and cancer treatment. Among cancer patients in the general population, males had higher cancer-specific mortality than females for cancers of the lip, stomach, colorectum, anus, liver, lung, skin, brain, and thyroid, with M:F HRs ranging from 1.06 to 1.59. Only colorectal cancer showed an attenuation in the female mortality advantage in transplant recipients (M:F HR<sub>Transplant</sub>: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77, 1.03; vs. M:F HR<sub>GenPop</sub>: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.08; P-interaction = 0.007). Among kidney cancer patients, the female mortality advantage was stronger in the transplant population (M:F HR<sub>Transplant</sub>: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.60; M:F HR<sub>GenPop</sub>: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.04; P-interaction = 0.003). Overall, we did not find consistent evidence that the female advantage in cancer mortality is weakened among immunosuppressed transplant recipients, suggesting that non-immune factors contribute to the female advantage among cancer patients in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Males have increased mortality after a cancer diagnosis than females, possibly due to poorer immunosurveillance. We tested whether the female survival advantage is lost with immunosuppression by evaluating 17,048 cancer patients (68% male) with a prior solid organ transplant using data from the US Transplant Cancer Match Study and 1,221,914 cancer patients (58% male) from the general population using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. We evaluated 13 solid cancers that occur in both sexes. We compared mortality due to cancer in males and females using a male:female hazard ratio (M:F HR) derived from Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, diagnosis year, stage, and cancer treatment. Among cancer patients in the general population, males had higher cancer-specific mortality than females for cancers of the lip, stomach, colorectum, anus, liver, lung, skin, brain, and thyroid, with M:F HRs ranging from 1.06 to 1.59. Only colorectal cancer showed an attenuation in the female mortality advantage in transplant recipients (M:F HRTransplant: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77, 1.03; vs. M:F HRGenPop: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.08; P-interaction = 0.007). Among kidney cancer patients, the female mortality advantage was stronger in the transplant population (M:F HRTransplant: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.60; M:F HRGenPop: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.04; P-interaction = 0.003). Overall, we did not find consistent evidence that the female advantage in cancer mortality is weakened among immunosuppressed transplant recipients, suggesting that non-immune factors contribute to the female advantage among cancer patients in the general population.

实体器官移植受者癌症死亡率的性别差异。
男性在癌症诊断后的死亡率比女性高,可能是由于免疫监测较差。我们使用来自美国移植癌症匹配研究的数据评估了17048例既往进行过实体器官移植的癌症患者(68%为男性),并使用来自监测、流行病学和最终结果项目的数据评估了来自普通人群的122214例癌症患者(58%为男性),从而测试了女性生存优势是否会因免疫抑制而丧失。我们评估了13例发生在两性中的实体癌。我们使用Cox比例风险模型得出的男女风险比(M:F HR),对年龄、种族/民族、诊断年份、分期和癌症治疗进行了调整,比较了男性和女性癌症死亡率。在普通人群的癌症患者中,男性在唇部、胃部、结肠直肠、肛门、肝脏、肺部、皮肤、脑部和甲状腺癌方面的癌症特异性死亡率高于女性,M:F hr范围为1.06至1.59。在移植受者中,只有结直肠癌显示出女性死亡率优势的衰减(M:F HRTransplant: 0.89;95% ci: 0.77, 1.03;vs. M:F HRGenPop: 1.07;95% ci: 1.06, 1.08;p -相互作用= 0.007)。在肾癌患者中,女性死亡率优势在移植人群中更强(M:F HRTransplant: 1.33;95% ci: 1.11, 1.60;M:F HRGenPop: 1.02;95% ci: 0.99, 1.04;p -相互作用= 0.003)。总的来说,我们没有发现一致的证据表明,在免疫抑制的移植受者中,女性在癌症死亡率方面的优势被削弱,这表明非免疫因素有助于在普通人群中癌症患者中的女性优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信