{"title":"Urinary sodium-potassium ratio as a genetic predictor of myocardial infarction.","authors":"Ziyang Wu, Dong Wang, Chengchun Tang","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between the urinary sodium-potassium ratio (USPR) and risk factors for heart disease has been observed over time. We evaluated the relationship between USPR and myocardial infarction (MI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Causal relationships were estimated based on USPR and MI data from genome-wide association studies. The main analysis method for bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization was inverse-variance weighting (IVW), with four other supplementary methods used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IVW method indicated a positive correlation between USPR levels and MI (IVW, odds ratio = 1.504, 95% confidence interval: 1.108-2.041, P = 0.009). In contrast, the inverse analysis provided evidence suggesting that MI affected USPR (P > 0.05). The Cochran Q test showed heterogeneity, while the intercept test revealed no horizontal pleiotropy, and the leave-one-out analysis demonstrated that the analyses were reliable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence for the causal effect of the USPR on MI; however, this was not the case in the opposite situation. It is plausible that the USPR serves as a promoting factor for MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The relationship between the urinary sodium-potassium ratio (USPR) and risk factors for heart disease has been observed over time. We evaluated the relationship between USPR and myocardial infarction (MI).
Methods: Causal relationships were estimated based on USPR and MI data from genome-wide association studies. The main analysis method for bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization was inverse-variance weighting (IVW), with four other supplementary methods used.
Results: The IVW method indicated a positive correlation between USPR levels and MI (IVW, odds ratio = 1.504, 95% confidence interval: 1.108-2.041, P = 0.009). In contrast, the inverse analysis provided evidence suggesting that MI affected USPR (P > 0.05). The Cochran Q test showed heterogeneity, while the intercept test revealed no horizontal pleiotropy, and the leave-one-out analysis demonstrated that the analyses were reliable.
Conclusions: This study provides evidence for the causal effect of the USPR on MI; however, this was not the case in the opposite situation. It is plausible that the USPR serves as a promoting factor for MI.
期刊介绍:
Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management.
Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.