Pembrolizumab with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Versus Alternative Systemic Treatments Recommended for the First-Line Treatment of Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Indirect Treatment Comparison

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Marcin Dzienis, Ali Mojebi, Sam Keeping, Christopher M. Black, Hilde Giezek, Niroshini Naicker, Chiara Vanetta, Julie E. Park, Keith Chan, Sanjay Merchant, Dandan Zheng
{"title":"Pembrolizumab with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Versus Alternative Systemic Treatments Recommended for the First-Line Treatment of Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Indirect Treatment Comparison","authors":"Marcin Dzienis,&nbsp;Ali Mojebi,&nbsp;Sam Keeping,&nbsp;Christopher M. Black,&nbsp;Hilde Giezek,&nbsp;Niroshini Naicker,&nbsp;Chiara Vanetta,&nbsp;Julie E. Park,&nbsp;Keith Chan,&nbsp;Sanjay Merchant,&nbsp;Dandan Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03144-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Based on the results of KEYNOTE-048 (NCT02358031), first-line standard-of-care treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) includes pembrolizumab alone or with platinum and fluorouracil (5-FU). Results from the single-arm KEYNOTE-B10 (NCT04489888) showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile offering an alternative pembrolizumab and chemotherapy regimen (KN-B10), with paclitaxel replacing 5-FU. With KEYNOTE-B10 being a non-comparative trial, this study aims to estimate the comparative efficacy of KN-B10 versus alternative first-line systemic treatments for R/M HNSCC via an indirect treatment comparison analysis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature review (October 2023) identified six connected randomized controlled trials with similar eligibility criteria to KEYNOTE-B10. Interventions included cetuximab + platinum + 5-FU (EXTREME), cetuximab + cisplatin + docetaxel (TPEx), pembrolizumab + platinum + 5-FU (KN-048), platinum + 5-FU, cisplatin + paclitaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU, and methotrexate. To connect KEYNOTE-B10 to the network, individual patient-level data were weighted to match the population characteristics of the most similar trial in the network (KEYNOTE-048). The comparative efficacy of KN-B10 versus other interventions was estimated via fixed-effect Bayesian network meta-analyses. Due to violations of the proportional-hazards assumption, fractional polynomials were used to model overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>For objective response, KN-B10 was comparable to EXTREME and TPEx and more efficacious than all other identified treatments (range of odds ratios [ORs]: 1.69–11.75), including KN-048 (OR: 1.69; 95% credible interval: 1.01–2.81). For OS and PFS, KN-B10 was comparable to EXTREME (with improvements in OS after month 12), TPEx, and KN-048. KN-B10 improved OS versus platinum + 5-FU (range of time-varying hazard ratios: 0.60–0.18; months 9–60), cisplatin + paclitaxel (0.53–0.24; 9–36), cisplatin (0.59–0.32; 6–24), 5-FU (0.58–0.20; 6–36), and methotrexate (0.61–0.07; 6–60). KN-B10 improved PFS versus platinum + 5-FU (0.60–0.31; 3–36).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The improved or comparable efficacy of KN-B10 versus alternative first-line interventions in terms of relevant clinical outcomes, as shown in this study, supports its recommendations for the treatment of R/M HNSCC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 6","pages":"2690 - 2707"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03144-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Based on the results of KEYNOTE-048 (NCT02358031), first-line standard-of-care treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) includes pembrolizumab alone or with platinum and fluorouracil (5-FU). Results from the single-arm KEYNOTE-B10 (NCT04489888) showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile offering an alternative pembrolizumab and chemotherapy regimen (KN-B10), with paclitaxel replacing 5-FU. With KEYNOTE-B10 being a non-comparative trial, this study aims to estimate the comparative efficacy of KN-B10 versus alternative first-line systemic treatments for R/M HNSCC via an indirect treatment comparison analysis.

Methods

A systematic literature review (October 2023) identified six connected randomized controlled trials with similar eligibility criteria to KEYNOTE-B10. Interventions included cetuximab + platinum + 5-FU (EXTREME), cetuximab + cisplatin + docetaxel (TPEx), pembrolizumab + platinum + 5-FU (KN-048), platinum + 5-FU, cisplatin + paclitaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU, and methotrexate. To connect KEYNOTE-B10 to the network, individual patient-level data were weighted to match the population characteristics of the most similar trial in the network (KEYNOTE-048). The comparative efficacy of KN-B10 versus other interventions was estimated via fixed-effect Bayesian network meta-analyses. Due to violations of the proportional-hazards assumption, fractional polynomials were used to model overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

For objective response, KN-B10 was comparable to EXTREME and TPEx and more efficacious than all other identified treatments (range of odds ratios [ORs]: 1.69–11.75), including KN-048 (OR: 1.69; 95% credible interval: 1.01–2.81). For OS and PFS, KN-B10 was comparable to EXTREME (with improvements in OS after month 12), TPEx, and KN-048. KN-B10 improved OS versus platinum + 5-FU (range of time-varying hazard ratios: 0.60–0.18; months 9–60), cisplatin + paclitaxel (0.53–0.24; 9–36), cisplatin (0.59–0.32; 6–24), 5-FU (0.58–0.20; 6–36), and methotrexate (0.61–0.07; 6–60). KN-B10 improved PFS versus platinum + 5-FU (0.60–0.31; 3–36).

Conclusion

The improved or comparable efficacy of KN-B10 versus alternative first-line interventions in terms of relevant clinical outcomes, as shown in this study, supports its recommendations for the treatment of R/M HNSCC.

派姆单抗联合卡铂和紫杉醇与推荐用于复发/转移性头颈癌一线治疗的其他全身治疗:间接治疗比较
基于KEYNOTE-048 (NCT02358031)的结果,复发或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(R/M HNSCC)患者的一线标准治疗包括派姆单抗单独或铂和氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)。单组KEYNOTE-B10 (NCT04489888)的结果显示出有希望的抗肿瘤活性和可管理的安全性,提供了一种替代派姆单抗和化疗方案(KN-B10),紫杉醇替代5-FU。由于KEYNOTE-B10是一项非比较试验,本研究旨在通过间接治疗比较分析来评估KN-B10与其他一线全身治疗对R/M HNSCC的比较疗效。方法:一项系统文献综述(2023年10月)确定了6项与KEYNOTE-B10具有相似资格标准的随机对照试验。干预措施包括西妥昔单抗+铂+ 5-FU (EXTREME)、西妥昔单抗+顺铂+多西紫杉醇(TPEx)、派姆单抗+铂+ 5-FU (kn048)、铂+ 5-FU、顺铂+紫杉醇、顺铂、5-FU和甲氨蝶呤。为了将KEYNOTE-B10连接到网络,对个体患者水平的数据进行加权,以匹配网络中最相似试验(KEYNOTE-048)的人群特征。通过固定效应贝叶斯网络meta分析估计KN-B10与其他干预措施的比较疗效。由于违反了比例风险假设,我们使用分数多项式来模拟总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。结果:在客观反应方面,KN-B10与EXTREME和TPEx相当,比所有其他确定的治疗更有效(优势比范围[OR]: 1.69-11.75),包括KN-048 (OR: 1.69;95%可信区间:1.01-2.81)。对于OS和PFS, KN-B10与EXTREME(12个月后OS有所改善)、TPEx和KN-048相当。与铂+ 5-FU相比,KN-B10改善的OS(时变风险比范围:0.60-0.18;9-60个月),顺铂+紫杉醇(0.53-0.24;9-36),顺铂(0.59-0.32;6-24), 5-fu (0.58-0.20;6-36),甲氨蝶呤(0.61-0.07;6-60)。KN-B10与铂+ 5-FU相比改善PFS (0.60-0.31;3-36)。结论:本研究显示,与其他一线干预措施相比,KN-B10在相关临床结果方面的疗效有所改善或相当,支持其治疗R/M型HNSCC的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信