Split-Spectrum Optical Attenuation Coefficient Method for Caries Detection.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Caries Research Pub Date : 2025-05-10 DOI:10.1159/000546320
Jian Liu, Linghui Kong, Han Su, Yao Yu, Zhenhe Ma
{"title":"Split-Spectrum Optical Attenuation Coefficient Method for Caries Detection.","authors":"Jian Liu, Linghui Kong, Han Su, Yao Yu, Zhenhe Ma","doi":"10.1159/000546320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Caries lesions that are difficult to detect through visual inspection pose risks to dental health. To address this, we propose a detection method using the split-spectrum optical attenuation coefficient (OAC), capitalizing on the wavelength-dependent properties of carious dental structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The complete OCT spectrum is divided into four spectral segments, each independently reconstructed and analyzed for OAC. OAC values are then compared across segments to differentiate between healthy and carious tissue. Experiments were conducted on ex vivo human teeth, with carious areas marked by dental professionals. The accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated and compared with the full-spectrum OAC method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For healthy enamel, OAC values ranged from 0.2 to 0.4 mm-1, remaining consistent across spectral bands. In carious enamel, OAC increased significantly (0.5-2.5 mm-1), with a 60% rise in short-wave versus long-wave OAC. Healthy dentin showed OAC values from 0.3 to 0.7 mm-1, whereas carious dentin reached 0.8-1.2 mm-1, with a 50% increase in short-wave OAC compared to long wave. The average false-positive rate of the method proposed in this paper is 0.9%, significantly lower than the 1.8% of the traditional OAC method (t test, n = 16, p = 0.013). The average false-negative rates of both methods are around 1%, with no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings indicate that the split-spectrum OAC method can effectively identify caries lesions, with higher accuracy and specificity compared to the traditional OAC method.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546320","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Caries lesions that are difficult to detect through visual inspection pose risks to dental health. To address this, we propose a detection method using the split-spectrum optical attenuation coefficient (OAC), capitalizing on the wavelength-dependent properties of carious dental structures.

Methods: The complete OCT spectrum is divided into four spectral segments, each independently reconstructed and analyzed for OAC. OAC values are then compared across segments to differentiate between healthy and carious tissue. Experiments were conducted on ex vivo human teeth, with carious areas marked by dental professionals. The accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated and compared with the full-spectrum OAC method.

Results: For healthy enamel, OAC values ranged from 0.2 to 0.4 mm-1, remaining consistent across spectral bands. In carious enamel, OAC increased significantly (0.5-2.5 mm-1), with a 60% rise in short-wave versus long-wave OAC. Healthy dentin showed OAC values from 0.3 to 0.7 mm-1, whereas carious dentin reached 0.8-1.2 mm-1, with a 50% increase in short-wave OAC compared to long wave. The average false-positive rate of the method proposed in this paper is 0.9%, significantly lower than the 1.8% of the traditional OAC method (t test, n = 16, p = 0.013). The average false-negative rates of both methods are around 1%, with no significant difference.

Conclusion: Findings indicate that the split-spectrum OAC method can effectively identify caries lesions, with higher accuracy and specificity compared to the traditional OAC method.

分谱光衰减系数法检测龋病。
导读:难以通过视觉检查发现的蛀牙对牙齿健康构成威胁。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种利用分谱光衰减系数(OAC)的检测方法,利用各种牙齿结构的波长依赖特性。方法:将完整的OCT光谱分为4个光谱段,每个光谱段独立重建并分析OAC。然后比较各节段的OAC值,以区分健康组织和龋齿组织。实验是在离体人类牙齿上进行的,由牙科专业人员标记出龋齿区域。对该方法的精度进行了评价,并与全谱OAC方法进行了比较。结果:对于健康的牙釉质,OAC值在0.2到0.4 mm - 1之间,在各个光谱波段保持一致。在龋齿牙釉质中,OAC显著增加(0.5-2.5 mm⁻),短波OAC比长波OAC增加60%。健康牙本质的OAC值为0.3 - 0.7 mm,而龋齿牙本质的OAC值为0.8-1.2 mm,与长波相比,短波的OAC增加了50%。本文方法的平均假阳性率为0.9%,显著低于传统OAC方法的1.8% (t检验,n=16, p=0.013)。两种方法的平均假阴性率均在1%左右,差异无统计学意义。结论:研究结果表明,与传统的OAC方法相比,分谱OAC方法可以有效地识别龋病,具有更高的准确性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Caries Research
Caries Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信