Tooth shell versus bone shell technique for horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Khaled Ahmed Ibrahim Awad, Mohamed Abdel-Monem Tawik, Mohamed Mohamed Hussein, Shaimaa Ahmed Abo El-Farag, Sally El Sayed Abdel Sameaa
{"title":"Tooth shell versus bone shell technique for horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation.","authors":"Khaled Ahmed Ibrahim Awad, Mohamed Abdel-Monem Tawik, Mohamed Mohamed Hussein, Shaimaa Ahmed Abo El-Farag, Sally El Sayed Abdel Sameaa","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05940-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was designed to evaluate the clinical and radiographical outcome of tooth shell for maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation as an alternative to traditional autogenous bone shell graft.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty eight patients with one or two maxillary extracted teeth (esthetic zone) in need for horizontal bone augmentation were divided into two groups (14 patients each). Group I (control group): bone augmentation was done by using bone shell technique (BST). Group II (study group): bone augmentation was done by using tooth shell technique (TST). Implant stability was evaluated at the time of implant placement, after 4 months (loading time), and 4 months after loading. Radiographic evaluation was made using Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans before grafting (T0), immediately (T1), and 6 months post grafting (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 30 implants were inserted in the esthetic zone. All implants were successfully osseointegrated. No statistically significant difference was found between the studied groups as regards implant stability (P > 0.05) assessed baseline, 4 months after implant placement, and 4 months after loading. The radiographic evaluation demonstrated a statistically significant lower median amount of graft resorption at 1 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm & total among the study than the control group (p = 0.001, 0.001, 0.04 & 0.001 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TST used for lateral ridge augmentation has excellent dimensional stability and the least amount of graft resorption.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was retrospectively registered on www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov with registration number (NCT06416605) on 16 /5 /2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"642"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05940-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical and radiographical outcome of tooth shell for maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation as an alternative to traditional autogenous bone shell graft.

Materials and methods: Twenty eight patients with one or two maxillary extracted teeth (esthetic zone) in need for horizontal bone augmentation were divided into two groups (14 patients each). Group I (control group): bone augmentation was done by using bone shell technique (BST). Group II (study group): bone augmentation was done by using tooth shell technique (TST). Implant stability was evaluated at the time of implant placement, after 4 months (loading time), and 4 months after loading. Radiographic evaluation was made using Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans before grafting (T0), immediately (T1), and 6 months post grafting (T2).

Results: In this study, 30 implants were inserted in the esthetic zone. All implants were successfully osseointegrated. No statistically significant difference was found between the studied groups as regards implant stability (P > 0.05) assessed baseline, 4 months after implant placement, and 4 months after loading. The radiographic evaluation demonstrated a statistically significant lower median amount of graft resorption at 1 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm & total among the study than the control group (p = 0.001, 0.001, 0.04 & 0.001 respectively).

Conclusion: TST used for lateral ridge augmentation has excellent dimensional stability and the least amount of graft resorption.

Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered on www.

Clinicaltrials: gov with registration number (NCT06416605) on 16 /5 /2024.

牙壳与骨壳技术在水平上颌牙槽嵴增加中的应用。
背景:本研究旨在评估牙壳作为传统自体骨壳移植替代上颌牙槽嵴增加术的临床和影像学结果。材料与方法:28例上颌拔牙(美观区)需行水平隆骨术的患者分为两组,每组14例。第一组(对照组):采用骨壳技术(BST)进行骨增强。第二组(研究组):采用牙壳技术(TST)进行骨增强。在种植体放置时、4个月后(加载时间)和加载后4个月评估种植体稳定性。植骨前(T0)、即刻(T1)和植骨后6个月(T2)采用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)进行影像学评价。结果:本研究共在美观区植入30颗假体。所有种植体均成功骨整合。各组在评估基线、种植体放置后4个月和加载后4个月的种植体稳定性方面无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。x线评估显示,与对照组相比,研究组移植骨在1mm、5mm和10mm处的中位吸收量有统计学意义(p分别= 0.001、0.001、0.04和0.001)。结论:TST用于侧脊隆胸具有良好的尺寸稳定性和最小的移植物吸收量。试验注册:本研究于2024年5月16日在www.Clinicaltrials: gov上回顾性注册,注册号为NCT06416605。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信