Negative sampling strategies impact the prediction of scale-free biomolecular network interactions with machine learning.

IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Pengpai Li, Bowen Shao, Guoqing Zhao, Zhi-Ping Liu
{"title":"Negative sampling strategies impact the prediction of scale-free biomolecular network interactions with machine learning.","authors":"Pengpai Li, Bowen Shao, Guoqing Zhao, Zhi-Ping Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12915-025-02231-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding protein-molecular interaction is crucial for unraveling the mechanisms underlying diverse biological processes. Machine learning (ML) techniques have been extensively employed in predicting these interactions and have garnered substantial research focus. Previous studies have predominantly centered on improving model performance through novel and efficient ML approaches, often resulting in overoptimistic predictive estimates. However, these advancements frequently neglect the inherent biases stemming from network properties, particularly in biological contexts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we examined the biases inherent in ML models during the learning and prediction of protein-molecular interactions, particularly those arising from the scale-free property of biological networks-a characteristic where in a few nodes have many connections while most have very few. Our comprehensive analysis across diverse tasks, datasets, and ML methods provides compelling evidence of these biases. We discovered that the training and evaluation of ML models are profoundly influenced by network topology, potentially distorting model performance assessments. To mitigate this issue, we propose the degree distribution balanced (DDB) sampling strategy, a straightforward yet potent approach that alleviates biases stemming from network properties. This method further underscores the limitations of certain ML models in learning protein-molecular interactions solely from intrinsic molecular features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings present a novel perspective for assessing the performance of ML models in inferring protein-molecular interactions with greater fairness. By addressing biases introduced by network properties, the DDB sampling approach provides a more balanced and precise assessment of model capabilities. These insights hold the potential to bolster the reliability of ML models in bioinformatics, fostering a more stringent evaluation framework for predicting protein-molecular interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9339,"journal":{"name":"BMC Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02231-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding protein-molecular interaction is crucial for unraveling the mechanisms underlying diverse biological processes. Machine learning (ML) techniques have been extensively employed in predicting these interactions and have garnered substantial research focus. Previous studies have predominantly centered on improving model performance through novel and efficient ML approaches, often resulting in overoptimistic predictive estimates. However, these advancements frequently neglect the inherent biases stemming from network properties, particularly in biological contexts.

Results: In this study, we examined the biases inherent in ML models during the learning and prediction of protein-molecular interactions, particularly those arising from the scale-free property of biological networks-a characteristic where in a few nodes have many connections while most have very few. Our comprehensive analysis across diverse tasks, datasets, and ML methods provides compelling evidence of these biases. We discovered that the training and evaluation of ML models are profoundly influenced by network topology, potentially distorting model performance assessments. To mitigate this issue, we propose the degree distribution balanced (DDB) sampling strategy, a straightforward yet potent approach that alleviates biases stemming from network properties. This method further underscores the limitations of certain ML models in learning protein-molecular interactions solely from intrinsic molecular features.

Conclusions: Our findings present a novel perspective for assessing the performance of ML models in inferring protein-molecular interactions with greater fairness. By addressing biases introduced by network properties, the DDB sampling approach provides a more balanced and precise assessment of model capabilities. These insights hold the potential to bolster the reliability of ML models in bioinformatics, fostering a more stringent evaluation framework for predicting protein-molecular interactions.

负采样策略影响无标度生物分子网络与机器学习相互作用的预测。
背景:了解蛋白质-分子相互作用对于揭示多种生物过程背后的机制至关重要。机器学习(ML)技术已被广泛用于预测这些相互作用,并获得了大量的研究重点。以前的研究主要集中在通过新颖有效的机器学习方法提高模型性能上,这往往导致过于乐观的预测估计。然而,这些进步往往忽视了源于网络特性的固有偏见,特别是在生物学背景下。结果:在这项研究中,我们研究了机器学习模型在学习和预测蛋白质-分子相互作用过程中固有的偏差,特别是那些由生物网络的无标度特性引起的偏差,即少数节点有许多连接,而大多数节点只有很少的连接。我们对不同任务、数据集和ML方法的综合分析为这些偏差提供了令人信服的证据。我们发现机器学习模型的训练和评估受到网络拓扑结构的深刻影响,可能会扭曲模型的性能评估。为了缓解这一问题,我们提出了度分布平衡(DDB)采样策略,这是一种简单而有效的方法,可以减轻由网络特性引起的偏差。该方法进一步强调了某些ML模型仅从内在分子特征学习蛋白质-分子相互作用的局限性。结论:我们的研究结果为评估ML模型在更公平地推断蛋白质-分子相互作用方面的性能提供了一个新的视角。通过解决由网络属性引入的偏差,DDB抽样方法提供了对模型功能更平衡和精确的评估。这些见解有可能增强生物信息学中ML模型的可靠性,培养更严格的评估框架来预测蛋白质-分子相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Biology
BMC Biology 生物-生物学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.90%
发文量
260
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Biology is a broad scope journal covering all areas of biology. Our content includes research articles, new methods and tools. BMC Biology also publishes reviews, Q&A, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信