Eosinophilic myocarditis in dilated cardiomyopathy: a case report.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mengxuan Li, Hong Chen
{"title":"Eosinophilic myocarditis in dilated cardiomyopathy: a case report.","authors":"Mengxuan Li, Hong Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12872-025-04826-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) is a rare cardiac condition that is often difficult to diagnose. Although endocardial myocardial biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, sampling errors can lead to false-negative results. This case report discusses the diagnosis and treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy in a patient with EM.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>In this article, we report a case of a 32-year-old female patient diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy. EM was strongly suspected based on a progressive increase in eosinophil count, the absence of known allergens or common etiological factors, elevated eosinophil levels in alveolar lavage fluid, and a diagnosis of eosinophilic pneumonia. However, endocardial myocardial biopsy results failed to show definite evidence of myocarditis. Despite the implementation of various therapeutic interventions including pharmacological treatments, electrical defibrillation, endotracheal intubation, and ventilator-assisted breathing, the patient's condition showed minimal improvement. Subsequent initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pump support also failed to achieve the anticipated recovery. The patient subsequently underwent heart transplantation, and cardiac tissue samples were sent for pathology examination. The diagnostic report revealed a large number of eosinophils, confirming the diagnosis of EM. After heart transplantation, the patient's vital signs gradually stabilized, and she was discharged in good condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endocardial myocardial biopsy plays an important role in diagnosing EM but may yield false-negative results. In this case, heart transplantation provided critical diagnostic information, with the pathology report confirming the presence of eosinophils and supporting the diagnosis of EM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04826-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) is a rare cardiac condition that is often difficult to diagnose. Although endocardial myocardial biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, sampling errors can lead to false-negative results. This case report discusses the diagnosis and treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy in a patient with EM.

Case presentation: In this article, we report a case of a 32-year-old female patient diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy. EM was strongly suspected based on a progressive increase in eosinophil count, the absence of known allergens or common etiological factors, elevated eosinophil levels in alveolar lavage fluid, and a diagnosis of eosinophilic pneumonia. However, endocardial myocardial biopsy results failed to show definite evidence of myocarditis. Despite the implementation of various therapeutic interventions including pharmacological treatments, electrical defibrillation, endotracheal intubation, and ventilator-assisted breathing, the patient's condition showed minimal improvement. Subsequent initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pump support also failed to achieve the anticipated recovery. The patient subsequently underwent heart transplantation, and cardiac tissue samples were sent for pathology examination. The diagnostic report revealed a large number of eosinophils, confirming the diagnosis of EM. After heart transplantation, the patient's vital signs gradually stabilized, and she was discharged in good condition.

Conclusions: Endocardial myocardial biopsy plays an important role in diagnosing EM but may yield false-negative results. In this case, heart transplantation provided critical diagnostic information, with the pathology report confirming the presence of eosinophils and supporting the diagnosis of EM.

扩张型心肌病并发嗜酸性心肌炎1例。
背景:嗜酸性心肌炎(EM)是一种罕见的心脏疾病,通常难以诊断。虽然心内膜心肌活检被认为是诊断的金标准,但抽样错误可能导致假阴性结果。本病例报告讨论了扩张型心肌病的诊断和治疗。病例介绍:在这篇文章中,我们报告了一位32岁的女性患者被诊断为扩张型心肌病。基于嗜酸性粒细胞计数的进行性增加,缺乏已知的过敏原或常见病因,肺泡灌洗液中嗜酸性粒细胞水平升高,以及嗜酸性粒细胞肺炎的诊断,强烈怀疑EM。然而,心内膜心肌活检结果未能显示心肌炎的明确证据。尽管实施了各种治疗干预措施,包括药物治疗、电除颤、气管插管和呼吸机辅助呼吸,但患者的病情改善甚微。随后开始的体外膜氧合和主动脉内球囊泵支持也未能达到预期的恢复。患者随后行心脏移植手术,并送心脏组织标本作病理检查。诊断报告显示大量嗜酸性粒细胞,证实了EM的诊断。心脏移植后,患者生命体征逐渐稳定,出院情况良好。结论:心内膜心肌活检在诊断EM中发挥重要作用,但可能产生假阴性结果。在这个病例中,心脏移植提供了关键的诊断信息,病理报告证实了嗜酸性粒细胞的存在,并支持了EM的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信