Ramona S DeJesus, Jane W Njeru, Mark R Beahm, Rachel E Gullerud, Jessica A Grimm, Barbara J Copeland, Julianne J Lunde, Ivana T Croghan
{"title":"An interactive care plan plus remote blood pressure monitoring in a rural primary care clinic: a pilot study.","authors":"Ramona S DeJesus, Jane W Njeru, Mark R Beahm, Rachel E Gullerud, Jessica A Grimm, Barbara J Copeland, Julianne J Lunde, Ivana T Croghan","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2025.2490589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remote blood pressure monitoring (RBPM), an effective method of enhancing BP control for patients with hypertension, can potentially helpovercome geographic limitations of health care services. We conducted a 90-day pilot to explore combining an interactive care plan (ICP) with RBPM.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The pilot invited fifty adult patients with uncontrolled hypertension (BP ≥140/90 mm Hg) empanelled to a rural primary care practice in midwestern United States. Participants received instructions for downloading an ICP app and were given a wireless BP monitoring device that automatically transmitted readings to their care team. Patients were surveyed after 30 and 90 days about program experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six patients enrolled. Mean participant age was 59.1 years; most were male, married, and White. Mean baseline BP was 153/89 mm Hg. Participants who engaged in the program for at least 75 days (<i>n</i> = 15) had a postintervention mean BP of 135/80 mm Hg. Sixteen participants (44%) had 1 outpatient visit (no multiple outpatient visits): only 4 (11%) had an emergency department visit. Among survey respondents, most strongly agreed or agreed that 1) ICP app was easy to use, 2) BP device was helpful in home care, 3) interacting remotely with care team was smooth, and 4) they were satisfied with functionality of the RBPM device.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An ICP paired with an RBPM device is a reasonable intervention for managing hypertension in a primary care practice particularly for patients in rural areas. New strategies must be developed to reduce barriers to meaningful engagement, achieve sustainability, and ensure successful widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":9000,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":"34 1","pages":"2490589"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2025.2490589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Remote blood pressure monitoring (RBPM), an effective method of enhancing BP control for patients with hypertension, can potentially helpovercome geographic limitations of health care services. We conducted a 90-day pilot to explore combining an interactive care plan (ICP) with RBPM.
Method: The pilot invited fifty adult patients with uncontrolled hypertension (BP ≥140/90 mm Hg) empanelled to a rural primary care practice in midwestern United States. Participants received instructions for downloading an ICP app and were given a wireless BP monitoring device that automatically transmitted readings to their care team. Patients were surveyed after 30 and 90 days about program experience.
Results: Thirty-six patients enrolled. Mean participant age was 59.1 years; most were male, married, and White. Mean baseline BP was 153/89 mm Hg. Participants who engaged in the program for at least 75 days (n = 15) had a postintervention mean BP of 135/80 mm Hg. Sixteen participants (44%) had 1 outpatient visit (no multiple outpatient visits): only 4 (11%) had an emergency department visit. Among survey respondents, most strongly agreed or agreed that 1) ICP app was easy to use, 2) BP device was helpful in home care, 3) interacting remotely with care team was smooth, and 4) they were satisfied with functionality of the RBPM device.
Conclusion: An ICP paired with an RBPM device is a reasonable intervention for managing hypertension in a primary care practice particularly for patients in rural areas. New strategies must be developed to reduce barriers to meaningful engagement, achieve sustainability, and ensure successful widespread adoption.
背景:远程血压监测(RBPM)是加强高血压患者血压控制的一种有效方法,可能有助于克服医疗保健服务的地理局限性。我们进行了为期90天的试点,探索将交互式护理计划(ICP)与RBPM相结合。方法:该试验邀请了50名未控制高血压(血压≥140/90 mm Hg)的成年患者到美国中西部的农村初级保健诊所就诊。参与者收到了下载ICP应用程序的指示,并获得了一个无线血压监测设备,该设备会自动将读数传输给他们的护理团队。患者在30天和90天后接受了关于项目体验的调查。结果:36例患者入组。参与者平均年龄为59.1岁;大多数是男性,已婚,白人。平均基线血压为153/89毫米汞柱。参与该计划至少75天的参与者(n = 15)干预后的平均血压为135/80毫米汞柱。16名参与者(44%)有一次门诊就诊(没有多次门诊就诊):只有4名(11%)有急诊就诊。在受访者中,大多数强烈同意或同意1)ICP应用程序易于使用,2)BP设备有助于家庭护理,3)与护理团队的远程交互顺畅,4)他们对RBPM设备的功能感到满意。结论:ICP与RBPM设备配对是一种合理的干预措施,在初级保健实践中管理高血压,特别是在农村地区的患者。必须制定新的战略,减少有意义参与的障碍,实现可持续性,并确保成功的广泛采用。
Blood PressureMedicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍:
For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management.
Features include:
• Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation
• Primary and secondary hypertension
• Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension
• Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension
• Non pharmacological and pharmacological management
• Large outcome trials in hypertension.