Acceptability and Feasibility of Remote PrEP Visits for Adolescent Girls and Young Women in South Africa.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Makhosazane Nomhle Ndimande-Khoza, Jennifer Velloza, Hlukelo Chauke, Lisa Mills, Nicole Poovan, Nontokozo Ndlovu, Tessa Concepcion, Sybil Hosek, Connie Celum, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe
{"title":"Acceptability and Feasibility of Remote PrEP Visits for Adolescent Girls and Young Women in South Africa.","authors":"Makhosazane Nomhle Ndimande-Khoza, Jennifer Velloza, Hlukelo Chauke, Lisa Mills, Nicole Poovan, Nontokozo Ndlovu, Tessa Concepcion, Sybil Hosek, Connie Celum, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04705-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization recommends differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for HIV prevention, including alternatives to clinic-based PrEP services. This study assessed the acceptability and feasibility of remote PrEP delivery-including HIV and pregnancy self-testing, and phone-based adherence counselling-among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Johannesburg. The research was nested within the PrEP SMART trial (2019-2022), which evaluated scalable adherence support strategies for AGYW aged 18-25. During COVID-19 lockdowns, PrEP refills and testing kits were delivered to participants' homes, and counselling was provided by phone. Using a phenomenological qualitative method, we conducted in-depth interviews with AGYW (n = 14) who had the option to complete remote PrEP visits (accepting or declining), study staff (n = 12), and key informants (n = 10) involved in PrEP programming. Thematic analysis explored experiences of remote delivery, focusing on acceptability and feasibility. AGYW found remote PrEP visits convenient, empowering, and time-saving. Procedures such as self-testing and phone counselling were generally acceptable, though some expressed anxiety about performing tests incorrectly and concerns over privacy, stigma, and unintentional disclosure of PrEP use at home. About half still preferred clinic-based visits. Staff and key informants recognized benefits, but highlighted challenges related to cost, sustainability, and provider workload. Suggestions for improvement included integrating contraception and partnering with community organizations. In conclusion, remote PrEP delivery is acceptable and feasible for many AGYW but not universally suitable. These findings support the inclusion of remote PrEP options in DSD models, with attention to privacy concerns and support for self-testing in this age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04705-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The World Health Organization recommends differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for HIV prevention, including alternatives to clinic-based PrEP services. This study assessed the acceptability and feasibility of remote PrEP delivery-including HIV and pregnancy self-testing, and phone-based adherence counselling-among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Johannesburg. The research was nested within the PrEP SMART trial (2019-2022), which evaluated scalable adherence support strategies for AGYW aged 18-25. During COVID-19 lockdowns, PrEP refills and testing kits were delivered to participants' homes, and counselling was provided by phone. Using a phenomenological qualitative method, we conducted in-depth interviews with AGYW (n = 14) who had the option to complete remote PrEP visits (accepting or declining), study staff (n = 12), and key informants (n = 10) involved in PrEP programming. Thematic analysis explored experiences of remote delivery, focusing on acceptability and feasibility. AGYW found remote PrEP visits convenient, empowering, and time-saving. Procedures such as self-testing and phone counselling were generally acceptable, though some expressed anxiety about performing tests incorrectly and concerns over privacy, stigma, and unintentional disclosure of PrEP use at home. About half still preferred clinic-based visits. Staff and key informants recognized benefits, but highlighted challenges related to cost, sustainability, and provider workload. Suggestions for improvement included integrating contraception and partnering with community organizations. In conclusion, remote PrEP delivery is acceptable and feasible for many AGYW but not universally suitable. These findings support the inclusion of remote PrEP options in DSD models, with attention to privacy concerns and support for self-testing in this age group.

南非少女和年轻妇女远程PrEP就诊的可接受性和可行性。
世界卫生组织建议采用差异化的艾滋病毒预防服务提供模式,包括替代以诊所为基础的PrEP服务。本研究评估了约翰内斯堡少女和年轻妇女(AGYW)远程PrEP分娩的可接受性和可行性,包括艾滋病毒和怀孕自检以及基于电话的依从性咨询。该研究嵌套在PrEP SMART试验(2019-2022)中,该试验评估了18-25岁AGYW的可扩展依从性支持策略。在2019冠状病毒病封锁期间,向参与者的家中提供了PrEP补充和检测包,并通过电话提供了咨询。采用现象学定性方法,我们对AGYW (n = 14)、研究人员(n = 12)和参与PrEP规划的关键线人(n = 10)进行了深入访谈。AGYW可以选择完成远程PrEP访问(接受或拒绝)。专题分析探讨了远程分娩的经验,重点是可接受性和可行性。AGYW发现远程PrEP访问方便,授权和节省时间。自我检测和电话咨询等程序一般是可以接受的,尽管一些人对错误地进行检测表示焦虑,并对隐私、污名和无意中披露在家使用PrEP的情况表示担忧。大约一半的人仍然倾向于去诊所就诊。工作人员和主要线人都认识到了好处,但也强调了与成本、可持续性和提供者工作量相关的挑战。改进建议包括纳入避孕措施和与社区组织合作。综上所述,对于许多AGYW来说,远程PrEP递送是可以接受和可行的,但并非普遍适用。这些发现支持在DSD模型中加入远程PrEP选项,同时关注隐私问题并支持该年龄组的自我测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信