'This is like tradition, lie on your back, hold your leg, and push': understanding midwives' perspectives on their choice of labour positions in a Ugandan hospital.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Zuhaira Husna Fatma, Helle Mölsted Alvesson, Gertrude Namazzi, Josephine Babirye Kyobe, Elizabeth Ayebare
{"title":"'This is like tradition, lie on your back, hold your leg, and push': understanding midwives' perspectives on their choice of labour positions in a Ugandan hospital.","authors":"Zuhaira Husna Fatma, Helle Mölsted Alvesson, Gertrude Namazzi, Josephine Babirye Kyobe, Elizabeth Ayebare","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07657-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the well-documented benefits of upright positions and mobility during labour and childbirth, the adoption of these remains limited. Offering women choices in labour positions is essential for respectful maternity care. Since midwives play a pivotal role in guiding women through labour, their perspectives are crucial to the effective integration of these practices.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to understand midwives' perspectives and reasoning behind their choice of labour positions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted in a regional referral hospital in eastern Uganda. Twelve midwives were recruited purposively at two different time points in December 2020 and February 2024. A data-driven reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Midwives' choice of labour positions was based on their understanding of the advantages and disadvantages for mothers and babies. Midwives were only open to changing their practices when they were confident in their knowledge and skills. The availability of resources influenced their perspectives on which positions were most feasible and effective in different situations. The midwives prioritised assessment of the mother's clinical condition rather than her preferences when choosing birth positions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted midwives' willingness to support different and, to them, new labour positions when confident in their efficacy and safety. Addressing misconceptions about risks and equipment needs is therefore crucial. The prevailing provider-centric norms in hospitals may shape midwives' approach to care, highlighting the need for supportive environments to foster midwives' confidence in new practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07657-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the well-documented benefits of upright positions and mobility during labour and childbirth, the adoption of these remains limited. Offering women choices in labour positions is essential for respectful maternity care. Since midwives play a pivotal role in guiding women through labour, their perspectives are crucial to the effective integration of these practices.

Aim: The study aimed to understand midwives' perspectives and reasoning behind their choice of labour positions.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in a regional referral hospital in eastern Uganda. Twelve midwives were recruited purposively at two different time points in December 2020 and February 2024. A data-driven reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.

Results: Midwives' choice of labour positions was based on their understanding of the advantages and disadvantages for mothers and babies. Midwives were only open to changing their practices when they were confident in their knowledge and skills. The availability of resources influenced their perspectives on which positions were most feasible and effective in different situations. The midwives prioritised assessment of the mother's clinical condition rather than her preferences when choosing birth positions.

Conclusion: This study highlighted midwives' willingness to support different and, to them, new labour positions when confident in their efficacy and safety. Addressing misconceptions about risks and equipment needs is therefore crucial. The prevailing provider-centric norms in hospitals may shape midwives' approach to care, highlighting the need for supportive environments to foster midwives' confidence in new practices.

“这就像传统一样,仰卧,抓住腿,然后推”:了解乌干达一家医院助产士对分娩姿势选择的看法。
导言:尽管在分娩和分娩时直立姿势和活动有充分的证据,但采用这些仍然有限。为妇女提供劳动岗位的选择是尊重产妇护理的必要条件。由于助产士在指导妇女分娩过程中发挥着关键作用,因此她们的观点对于有效整合这些做法至关重要。目的:该研究旨在了解助产士的观点和他们选择分娩位置背后的原因。方法:本定性研究在乌干达东部地区转诊医院进行。在2020年12月和2024年2月的两个不同时间点有目的地招募了12名助产士。进行了数据驱动的反身性主题分析。结果:助产士对分娩体位的选择是基于对母婴利弊的理解。助产士只有在对自己的知识和技能有信心时才愿意改变自己的做法。资源的可得性影响了他们对在不同情况下哪种立场最可行和最有效的看法。助产士在选择分娩姿势时优先考虑母亲的临床状况,而不是她的偏好。结论:本研究突出了助产士在对其有效性和安全性有信心时支持不同的和对他们来说,新的劳动岗位的意愿。因此,消除对风险和设备需求的误解至关重要。医院中普遍存在的以提供者为中心的规范可能会影响助产士的护理方法,强调需要支持性环境来培养助产士对新做法的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信