18F-FDG PET/CT-based deep learning models and a clinical-metabolic nomogram for predicting high-grade patterns in lung adenocarcinoma.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yue Guo, Xibin Jia, Chuanxu Yang, Chao Fan, Hui Zhu, Xu Chen, Fugeng Liu
{"title":"<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT-based deep learning models and a clinical-metabolic nomogram for predicting high-grade patterns in lung adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Yue Guo, Xibin Jia, Chuanxu Yang, Chao Fan, Hui Zhu, Xu Chen, Fugeng Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01684-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To develop and validate deep learning (DL) and traditional clinical-metabolic (CM) models based on 18 F-FDG PET/CT images for noninvasively predicting high-grade patterns (HGPs) of invasive lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 303 patients with invasive LUAD were enrolled in this retrospective study; these patients were randomly divided into training, validation and test sets at a ratio of 7:1:2. DL models were trained and optimized on PET, CT and PET/CT fusion images, respectively. CM model was built from clinical and PET/CT metabolic parameters via backwards stepwise logistic regression and visualized via a nomogram. The prediction performance of the models was evaluated mainly by the area under the curve (AUC). We also compared the AUCs of different models for the test set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CM model was established upon clinical stage (OR: 7.30; 95% CI: 2.46-26.37), cytokeratin 19 fragment 21 - 1 (CYFRA 21-1, OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.96-1.57), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean, OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.17-1.49), total lesion glycolysis (TLG, OR: 0.994; 95% CI: 0.990-1.000) and size (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.95-2.02). Both the DL and CM models exhibited good prediction efficacy in the three cohorts, with AUCs ranging from 0.817 to 0.977. For the test set, the highest AUC was yielded by the CT-DL model (0.895), followed by the PET/CT-DL model (0.882), CM model (0.879) and PET-DL model (0.817), but no significant difference was revealed between any two models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep learning and clinical-metabolic models based on the <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT model could effectively identify LUAD patients with HGP. These models could aid in treatment planning and precision medicine.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01684-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To develop and validate deep learning (DL) and traditional clinical-metabolic (CM) models based on 18 F-FDG PET/CT images for noninvasively predicting high-grade patterns (HGPs) of invasive lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

Methods: A total of 303 patients with invasive LUAD were enrolled in this retrospective study; these patients were randomly divided into training, validation and test sets at a ratio of 7:1:2. DL models were trained and optimized on PET, CT and PET/CT fusion images, respectively. CM model was built from clinical and PET/CT metabolic parameters via backwards stepwise logistic regression and visualized via a nomogram. The prediction performance of the models was evaluated mainly by the area under the curve (AUC). We also compared the AUCs of different models for the test set.

Results: CM model was established upon clinical stage (OR: 7.30; 95% CI: 2.46-26.37), cytokeratin 19 fragment 21 - 1 (CYFRA 21-1, OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.96-1.57), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean, OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.17-1.49), total lesion glycolysis (TLG, OR: 0.994; 95% CI: 0.990-1.000) and size (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.95-2.02). Both the DL and CM models exhibited good prediction efficacy in the three cohorts, with AUCs ranging from 0.817 to 0.977. For the test set, the highest AUC was yielded by the CT-DL model (0.895), followed by the PET/CT-DL model (0.882), CM model (0.879) and PET-DL model (0.817), but no significant difference was revealed between any two models.

Conclusions: Deep learning and clinical-metabolic models based on the 18F-FDG PET/CT model could effectively identify LUAD patients with HGP. These models could aid in treatment planning and precision medicine.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

基于18F-FDG PET/ ct的深度学习模型和临床代谢图预测肺腺癌的高级别模式。
背景:基于18张F-FDG PET/CT图像,开发并验证深度学习(DL)和传统临床代谢(CM)模型,用于无创预测侵袭性肺腺癌(LUAD)的高级别模式(HGPs)。方法:对303例有创LUAD患者进行回顾性研究;这些患者按7:1:2的比例随机分为训练组、验证组和测试组。分别在PET、CT和PET/CT融合图像上对DL模型进行训练和优化。CM模型由临床和PET/CT代谢参数通过反向逐步逻辑回归建立,并通过nomogram可视化。模型的预测性能主要由曲线下面积(AUC)来评价。我们还比较了测试集不同模型的auc。结果:临床分期建立CM模型(OR: 7.30;95% CI: 2.46-26.37),细胞角蛋白19片段21-1 (CYFRA 21-1, OR: 1.18;95% CI: 0.96-1.57),平均标准化摄取值(SUVmean, OR: 1.31;95% CI: 1.17-1.49),病变总糖酵解(TLG, OR: 0.994;95% CI: 0.990-1.000)和大小(OR: 1.37;95% ci: 0.95-2.02)。DL和CM模型在3个队列中均表现出较好的预测效果,auc范围为0.817 ~ 0.977。测试集的AUC以CT-DL模型最高(0.895),PET/CT-DL模型次之(0.882),CM模型次之(0.879),PET- dl模型次之(0.817),但两种模型间无显著差异。结论:基于18F-FDG PET/CT模型的深度学习和临床代谢模型可有效识别LUAD合并HGP患者。这些模型可以帮助制定治疗计划和精准医疗。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信