Thomas Stieglitz, Ines Bersch, Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting, Cristian Pasluosta
{"title":"Differences and Commonalities of Electrical Stimulation Paradigms After Central Paralysis and Amputation.","authors":"Thomas Stieglitz, Ines Bersch, Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting, Cristian Pasluosta","doi":"10.1111/aor.15017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) or with severe brain stroke suffer from life-lasting functional and sensory impairments. Other traumatic injuries such as limb loss after an accident or disease also affect motor function and sensory feedback and impair quality of life in those individuals. Invasive and non-invasive functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a well-established method to partially restore function and sensory feedback of paralyzed and phantom limbs. It is also a supporting technology for the rehabilitation of the neuromuscular system and for complementing assistive devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This work reviews the current state-of-the-art of FES as a technology for restoring function and supporting rehabilitation therapy and assistive devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Electrodes, electrical stimulation, use of brain signals for rehabilitation and control, and sensory feedback are covered as parts of the whole. A perspective is given on how clinical and research protocols developed for patients with SCI and brain injuries can be translated to the treatment of patients with an amputation and vice versa. We further elaborate on how motor learning strategies with quantitative electrophysiological and kinematic measurements may help caregivers in the rehabilitation process. Insights from practitioners (collected during a workshop of the IFESS 2025) have been integrated to summarize common needs, open questions, and challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The information from the literature and from practitioners was integrated to propose the next steps towards establishing common guidelines and measures of FES in clinical practice towards evidence-driven treatment and objective assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.15017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) or with severe brain stroke suffer from life-lasting functional and sensory impairments. Other traumatic injuries such as limb loss after an accident or disease also affect motor function and sensory feedback and impair quality of life in those individuals. Invasive and non-invasive functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a well-established method to partially restore function and sensory feedback of paralyzed and phantom limbs. It is also a supporting technology for the rehabilitation of the neuromuscular system and for complementing assistive devices.
Methods: This work reviews the current state-of-the-art of FES as a technology for restoring function and supporting rehabilitation therapy and assistive devices.
Results: Electrodes, electrical stimulation, use of brain signals for rehabilitation and control, and sensory feedback are covered as parts of the whole. A perspective is given on how clinical and research protocols developed for patients with SCI and brain injuries can be translated to the treatment of patients with an amputation and vice versa. We further elaborate on how motor learning strategies with quantitative electrophysiological and kinematic measurements may help caregivers in the rehabilitation process. Insights from practitioners (collected during a workshop of the IFESS 2025) have been integrated to summarize common needs, open questions, and challenges.
Conclusions: The information from the literature and from practitioners was integrated to propose the next steps towards establishing common guidelines and measures of FES in clinical practice towards evidence-driven treatment and objective assessments.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.