A Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Endochondral Ossification-Based Grafts in Bone Defect Regeneration: An Analysis of Animal Studies.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yihua Shi, Ranning Zhuo, Weichun Guo, Yubo Shi
{"title":"A Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Endochondral Ossification-Based Grafts in Bone Defect Regeneration: An Analysis of Animal Studies.","authors":"Yihua Shi, Ranning Zhuo, Weichun Guo, Yubo Shi","doi":"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The regeneration of bone defects through bone grafts primarily depends on two strategies: intramembrane ossification (IO) and endochondral ossification (EO). Traditional bone tissue engineering has focused on mimicking the IO process to stimulate the formation of a bone-like matrix. However, repair strategies based on IO often result in excessive deposition of the matrix on the graft surface, hindering bone tissue regeneration. In recent years, researchers have increasingly focused on investigating the reparative potential of EO-based grafts for bone defects, such as microspheres, pellets, and hydrogel. However, the effectiveness of EO-based grafts on bone defects has not yet been quantitatively evaluated. Therefore, this study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous studies to quantitatively assess the bone regenerative potential of EO-based grafts. The results revealed that EO-based grafts showed favorable ability for bone regeneration. However, there was no significant difference in bone regeneration between EO-based grafts that utilized chondrogenic differentiation or hypertrophic differentiation. Additionally, the results demonstrated low quality in the experimental methods and the reporting of animal studies as well as a low quality of evidence provided by the included studies. Based on this, we propose three suggestions to enhance the quality of experimental methods and reporting in animal experiments. Furthermore, it is essential to conduct more evidence-based research to establish reliable evidence for the clinical application of EO-based grafts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8,"journal":{"name":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","volume":"11 5","pages":"2481-2491"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The regeneration of bone defects through bone grafts primarily depends on two strategies: intramembrane ossification (IO) and endochondral ossification (EO). Traditional bone tissue engineering has focused on mimicking the IO process to stimulate the formation of a bone-like matrix. However, repair strategies based on IO often result in excessive deposition of the matrix on the graft surface, hindering bone tissue regeneration. In recent years, researchers have increasingly focused on investigating the reparative potential of EO-based grafts for bone defects, such as microspheres, pellets, and hydrogel. However, the effectiveness of EO-based grafts on bone defects has not yet been quantitatively evaluated. Therefore, this study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous studies to quantitatively assess the bone regenerative potential of EO-based grafts. The results revealed that EO-based grafts showed favorable ability for bone regeneration. However, there was no significant difference in bone regeneration between EO-based grafts that utilized chondrogenic differentiation or hypertrophic differentiation. Additionally, the results demonstrated low quality in the experimental methods and the reporting of animal studies as well as a low quality of evidence provided by the included studies. Based on this, we propose three suggestions to enhance the quality of experimental methods and reporting in animal experiments. Furthermore, it is essential to conduct more evidence-based research to establish reliable evidence for the clinical application of EO-based grafts.

软骨内成骨移植骨缺损再生效果的定量评价:动物实验分析。
骨移植的骨缺损再生主要依靠两种策略:膜内成骨(IO)和软骨内成骨(EO)。传统的骨组织工程侧重于模拟IO过程来刺激骨样基质的形成。然而,基于IO的修复策略往往导致基质在移植物表面过度沉积,阻碍骨组织再生。近年来,研究人员越来越关注eo基骨移植的修复潜力,如微球、颗粒和水凝胶。然而,基于eo的骨移植对骨缺损的有效性尚未得到定量评价。因此,本研究对以往研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,定量评估eo基移植物的骨再生潜力。结果表明,eo基骨移植具有良好的骨再生能力。然而,利用软骨分化或增生性分化的eo基移植物在骨再生方面没有显著差异。此外,结果表明实验方法和动物研究报告的质量较低,所纳入的研究提供的证据质量也较低。基于此,我们提出三点建议,以提高动物实验的实验方法和报告质量。此外,需要开展更多的循证研究,为eo基移植物的临床应用建立可靠的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering Materials Science-Biomaterials
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
413
期刊介绍: ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering is the leading journal in the field of biomaterials, serving as an international forum for publishing cutting-edge research and innovative ideas on a broad range of topics: Applications and Health – implantable tissues and devices, prosthesis, health risks, toxicology Bio-interactions and Bio-compatibility – material-biology interactions, chemical/morphological/structural communication, mechanobiology, signaling and biological responses, immuno-engineering, calcification, coatings, corrosion and degradation of biomaterials and devices, biophysical regulation of cell functions Characterization, Synthesis, and Modification – new biomaterials, bioinspired and biomimetic approaches to biomaterials, exploiting structural hierarchy and architectural control, combinatorial strategies for biomaterials discovery, genetic biomaterials design, synthetic biology, new composite systems, bionics, polymer synthesis Controlled Release and Delivery Systems – biomaterial-based drug and gene delivery, bio-responsive delivery of regulatory molecules, pharmaceutical engineering Healthcare Advances – clinical translation, regulatory issues, patient safety, emerging trends Imaging and Diagnostics – imaging agents and probes, theranostics, biosensors, monitoring Manufacturing and Technology – 3D printing, inks, organ-on-a-chip, bioreactor/perfusion systems, microdevices, BioMEMS, optics and electronics interfaces with biomaterials, systems integration Modeling and Informatics Tools – scaling methods to guide biomaterial design, predictive algorithms for structure-function, biomechanics, integrating bioinformatics with biomaterials discovery, metabolomics in the context of biomaterials Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine – basic and applied studies, cell therapies, scaffolds, vascularization, bioartificial organs, transplantation and functionality, cellular agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信