Consensus on the Use of JAKinibs for Atopic Dermatitis in Australia and New Zealand. An eDelphi by the Australasian Medical Dermatology Group.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Marius Rademaker, Peter Foley, Katherine Armour, Christopher Baker, Kurt Gebauer, Monisha Gupta, Patrick Ireland, Harriet Kennedy, Gillian Marshman, Erin McMeniman, Diana Rubel, Diana Slape, John Sullivan, Matthew Verheyden, Li-Chuen Wong
{"title":"Consensus on the Use of JAKinibs for Atopic Dermatitis in Australia and New Zealand. An eDelphi by the Australasian Medical Dermatology Group.","authors":"Marius Rademaker, Peter Foley, Katherine Armour, Christopher Baker, Kurt Gebauer, Monisha Gupta, Patrick Ireland, Harriet Kennedy, Gillian Marshman, Erin McMeniman, Diana Rubel, Diana Slape, John Sullivan, Matthew Verheyden, Li-Chuen Wong","doi":"10.1111/ajd.14525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With its chronicity and varied symptomatology, moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) remains a significant challenge for both patients and health care professionals. Novel targeted therapies, including the JAK inhibitors (JAKi) offer significant hope. There are many systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the use of JAKi for the management of atopic dermatitis, but few offer practical advice for the clinician. The aim of this consensus development was to place the current literature for JAKi use in atopic dermatitis within the clinical context of practice in Australasia. The Australasian Medical Dermatology Group (AMDG) reviewed the evidence for the use of JAKi in the management landscape of atopic dermatitis, adding in their cumulative experience, and used an eDelphi process to agree on best practice. In the first round of 133 eDelphi clinical practice statements, consensus was achieved in 117 (88%-complete 27.8%, close 60.1%), with no consensus in 16 (12.0%) of the statements. The 16 clinical practice statements that did not reach consensus were reviewed and revised to 15 statements and then subjected to a second round: complete consensus was achieved in 5/15 statements, close consensus in 6/15, and no consensus in 4/15. Over the two eDelphi rounds, consensus was achieved in 128/132 (97%-complete 32%, close 64%) and no consensus in 4/132 (3%). Statements regarding screening for prior varicella infection, age-appropriate cancer screening intervals, and management of flares did not reach full consensus. This study highlights areas where further research is needed to assist practicing dermatologists in safe prescribing and management of atopic dermatitis with JAK inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":8638,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.14525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With its chronicity and varied symptomatology, moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) remains a significant challenge for both patients and health care professionals. Novel targeted therapies, including the JAK inhibitors (JAKi) offer significant hope. There are many systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the use of JAKi for the management of atopic dermatitis, but few offer practical advice for the clinician. The aim of this consensus development was to place the current literature for JAKi use in atopic dermatitis within the clinical context of practice in Australasia. The Australasian Medical Dermatology Group (AMDG) reviewed the evidence for the use of JAKi in the management landscape of atopic dermatitis, adding in their cumulative experience, and used an eDelphi process to agree on best practice. In the first round of 133 eDelphi clinical practice statements, consensus was achieved in 117 (88%-complete 27.8%, close 60.1%), with no consensus in 16 (12.0%) of the statements. The 16 clinical practice statements that did not reach consensus were reviewed and revised to 15 statements and then subjected to a second round: complete consensus was achieved in 5/15 statements, close consensus in 6/15, and no consensus in 4/15. Over the two eDelphi rounds, consensus was achieved in 128/132 (97%-complete 32%, close 64%) and no consensus in 4/132 (3%). Statements regarding screening for prior varicella infection, age-appropriate cancer screening intervals, and management of flares did not reach full consensus. This study highlights areas where further research is needed to assist practicing dermatologists in safe prescribing and management of atopic dermatitis with JAK inhibitors.

澳大利亚和新西兰对JAKinibs治疗特应性皮炎的共识。澳大利亚医学皮肤病组的eDelphi。
中度至重度特应性皮炎(AD)具有慢性和多种症状,对患者和卫生保健专业人员来说仍然是一个重大挑战。包括JAK抑制剂(JAKi)在内的新型靶向治疗带来了重大希望。有许多关于使用JAKi治疗特应性皮炎的系统综述和荟萃分析,但很少为临床医生提供实用的建议。这一共识发展的目的是将目前关于JAKi在澳大拉西亚特应性皮炎中应用的文献纳入临床实践。澳大利亚医学皮肤科小组(AMDG)审查了在特应性皮炎管理领域使用JAKi的证据,并增加了他们的累积经验,并使用eDelphi过程来商定最佳实践。在第一轮133份eDelphi临床实践声明中,117份(88%-完成27.8%,接近60.1%)达成共识,16份(12.0%)声明未达成共识。对未达成共识的16条临床实践陈述进行审核,修改为15条,然后进行第二轮审核:5/15条完全一致,6/15条接近一致,4/15条不一致。在两轮eDelphi中,128/132(97%-完成32%,接近64%)达成共识,而4/132(3%)没有达成共识。关于既往水痘感染筛查、与年龄相适应的癌症筛查间隔和耀斑管理的声明尚未达成完全共识。这项研究强调了需要进一步研究的领域,以协助执业皮肤科医生安全处方和管理使用JAK抑制剂的特应性皮炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal of Dermatology is the official journal of the Australasian College of Dermatologists and the New Zealand Dermatological Society, publishing peer-reviewed, original research articles, reviews and case reports dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in dermatology. Clinical presentations, medical and physical therapies and investigations, including dermatopathology and mycology, are covered. Short articles may be published under the headings ‘Signs, Syndromes and Diagnoses’, ‘Dermatopathology Presentation’, ‘Vignettes in Contact Dermatology’, ‘Surgery Corner’ or ‘Letters to the Editor’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信