Reduced FOV T2-weighted imaging, 2.5D T2-weighted imaging, and high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 5 T: a comparative study with 3 T.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Liting Shen, Yue Cheng, Jin Liu, Hui Xu, Dan Yu, Hualu Han, Kewei Wang, Zhenghan Yang, Liang Wang
{"title":"Reduced FOV T2-weighted imaging, 2.5D T2-weighted imaging, and high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 5 T: a comparative study with 3 T.","authors":"Liting Shen, Yue Cheng, Jin Liu, Hui Xu, Dan Yu, Hualu Han, Kewei Wang, Zhenghan Yang, Liang Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04954-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the image quality of prostate T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 5 T.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, asymptomatic adult male volunteers underwent conventional T2WI and multiple b-value DWI at both 3 T and 5 T, along with 2.5D T2WI at 5 T using the 2.5D imaging method. 2.5D imaging method improved in-plane resolution by reducing slice thickness and increasing the number of signal averaged to maintain the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Three scanning protocols were compared: conventional T2WI at 5 T vs. 3 T, 2.5D T2WI at 5 T vs. conventional T2WI at 5 T, and DWI at 5 T vs. 3 T. Quantitative analysis encompassed SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), prostate dimensions, prostate volume (PV), edge rise distance of the dorsal prostate capsule, and ADC values in benign lesions. Image quality was qualitatively rated using a five-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic, 5 = excellent). Statistical significance was assessed using paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty participants were enrolled. Compared to 3 T, 5 T significantly increased SNR and CNR for T2WI (sagittal, coronal, and axial planes) and DWI (b-values of 1000, 1500, 2000 s/mm²) (P < 0.05). Image sharpness and clarity were significantly enhanced for T2WI and DWI at 5 T (P < 0.05). The 2.5D imaging method further improved T2WI resolution, overall image quality, and clarity of the prostate capsule. No significant differences were observed in artifact presence or PV between the T2WI groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>5 T bi-parametric MRI (bp-MRI) of the prostate demonstrated superior image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04954-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the image quality of prostate T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 5 T.

Methods: In this prospective study, asymptomatic adult male volunteers underwent conventional T2WI and multiple b-value DWI at both 3 T and 5 T, along with 2.5D T2WI at 5 T using the 2.5D imaging method. 2.5D imaging method improved in-plane resolution by reducing slice thickness and increasing the number of signal averaged to maintain the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Three scanning protocols were compared: conventional T2WI at 5 T vs. 3 T, 2.5D T2WI at 5 T vs. conventional T2WI at 5 T, and DWI at 5 T vs. 3 T. Quantitative analysis encompassed SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), prostate dimensions, prostate volume (PV), edge rise distance of the dorsal prostate capsule, and ADC values in benign lesions. Image quality was qualitatively rated using a five-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic, 5 = excellent). Statistical significance was assessed using paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05.

Results: Twenty participants were enrolled. Compared to 3 T, 5 T significantly increased SNR and CNR for T2WI (sagittal, coronal, and axial planes) and DWI (b-values of 1000, 1500, 2000 s/mm²) (P < 0.05). Image sharpness and clarity were significantly enhanced for T2WI and DWI at 5 T (P < 0.05). The 2.5D imaging method further improved T2WI resolution, overall image quality, and clarity of the prostate capsule. No significant differences were observed in artifact presence or PV between the T2WI groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: 5 T bi-parametric MRI (bp-MRI) of the prostate demonstrated superior image quality.

5t时前列腺低视距t2加权成像、2.5D t2加权成像和高b值弥散加权成像:与3t的比较研究
目的:评价前列腺t2加权成像(T2WI)和弥散加权成像(DWI)在5 T时的图像质量。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,无症状成年男性志愿者在3 T和5 T时接受常规T2WI和多重b值DWI检查,并在5 T时使用2.5D成像方法进行2.5D T2WI检查。2.5D成像方法通过减小切片厚度和增加平均信号数来提高面内分辨率,以保持信噪比。比较三种扫描方案:5t常规T2WI与3t、5t 2.5D T2WI与5t常规T2WI、5t DWI与3t。定量分析包括信噪比、噪比(CNR)、前列腺尺寸、前列腺体积(PV)、前列腺囊背侧边缘上升距离、良性病变ADC值。使用李克特5分量表对图像质量进行定性评定(1 =非诊断性,5 =优秀)。采用配对t检验和Wilcoxon sign -rank检验评估统计学显著性,显著性阈值为P。与3t相比,5t显著提高T2WI(矢状面、冠状面和轴向面)和DWI (b值为1000、1500、2000 s/mm²)的信噪比和CNR (P < 0.05)。结论:5t双参数前列腺磁共振成像(bp-MRI)具有较好的图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信