Effect of Comfortable Nursing Mode on Perioperative Nursing Effect and Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Myomectomy.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Yueqin Lu, Wei Jiang, Yuwen Qian, Jiawei Yuan, Menyao Xu, Xiaowei Chen
{"title":"Effect of Comfortable Nursing Mode on Perioperative Nursing Effect and Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Myomectomy.","authors":"Yueqin Lu, Wei Jiang, Yuwen Qian, Jiawei Yuan, Menyao Xu, Xiaowei Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effect of comfortable nursing mode on the perioperative nursing effect and quality of life of patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 150 patients with uterine fibroids who were admitted and treated with laparoscopic myomectomy in our hospital from April 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled. The patients in the control group (n = 75) received routine nursing while those in the experimental group (n = 75) received comfortable nursing. The nursing effect, quality of life, and patient satisfaction of the two groups of patients before and after nursing intervention were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The length of hospital stay in the experimental group (6.25 ± 0.55 days) was significantly shorter than the control group (8.91 ± 0.85 days) (P < .05). After nursing intervention, patients in the experimental group had significantly higher awareness compared to the control group (P < .05). The scores of physiological, psychological, environmental, and social dimensions of the patients in the experimental group (10.45 ± 2.14, 19.58 ± 2.44, 25.58 ± 3.12, and 23.51 ± 3.26, respectively) were higher than those in the control group (7.41 ± 1.98, 16.59 ± 2.15, 20.41 ± 2.98, and 20.87 ± 3.14, respectively), and the total score was also significantly higher in the experimental group (P < .05). After the intervention, the psychological state scores of the two groups decreased, and the SAS and SDS scores of the experimental group were significantly lower than the control group (P < .05). The experimental group reported significantly lower incidence of complications (2.63%) compared to the control group (14.67%) (P < .05), while patients in the experimental group were more satisfied compared to the control group, P < .05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comfortable nursing model might be a viable option for patients with laparoscopic myomectomy and deserves wider application in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effect of comfortable nursing mode on the perioperative nursing effect and quality of life of patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy.

Methods: A total of 150 patients with uterine fibroids who were admitted and treated with laparoscopic myomectomy in our hospital from April 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled. The patients in the control group (n = 75) received routine nursing while those in the experimental group (n = 75) received comfortable nursing. The nursing effect, quality of life, and patient satisfaction of the two groups of patients before and after nursing intervention were compared.

Results: The length of hospital stay in the experimental group (6.25 ± 0.55 days) was significantly shorter than the control group (8.91 ± 0.85 days) (P < .05). After nursing intervention, patients in the experimental group had significantly higher awareness compared to the control group (P < .05). The scores of physiological, psychological, environmental, and social dimensions of the patients in the experimental group (10.45 ± 2.14, 19.58 ± 2.44, 25.58 ± 3.12, and 23.51 ± 3.26, respectively) were higher than those in the control group (7.41 ± 1.98, 16.59 ± 2.15, 20.41 ± 2.98, and 20.87 ± 3.14, respectively), and the total score was also significantly higher in the experimental group (P < .05). After the intervention, the psychological state scores of the two groups decreased, and the SAS and SDS scores of the experimental group were significantly lower than the control group (P < .05). The experimental group reported significantly lower incidence of complications (2.63%) compared to the control group (14.67%) (P < .05), while patients in the experimental group were more satisfied compared to the control group, P < .05.

Conclusion: Comfortable nursing model might be a viable option for patients with laparoscopic myomectomy and deserves wider application in clinical practice.

舒适护理模式对腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术患者围手术期护理效果及生活质量的影响。
目的:分析舒适护理模式对腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术患者围手术期护理效果及生活质量的影响。方法:选取2020年4月至2021年12月我院收治并行腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的子宫肌瘤患者150例。对照组(75例)采用常规护理,实验组(75例)采用舒适护理。比较两组患者在护理干预前后的护理效果、生活质量及患者满意度。结果:实验组住院时间(6.25±0.55 d)明显短于对照组(8.91±0.85 d) (P < 0.05)。护理干预后,实验组患者的认知水平明显高于对照组(P < 0.05)。实验组患者生理、心理、环境、社会维度得分(分别为10.45±2.14、19.58±2.44、25.58±3.12、23.51±3.26)高于对照组(分别为7.41±1.98、16.59±2.15、20.41±2.98、20.87±3.14),总得分也显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。干预后,两组患者心理状态评分均下降,实验组SAS、SDS评分均显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。实验组患者并发症发生率(2.63%)显著低于对照组(14.67%)(P < 0.05),患者满意度显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:舒适护理模式可能是腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术患者的可行选择,值得在临床中广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信