Rikke Damgaard, David Jenkins, Mark H Stoler, Miekel van de Sandt, Maurits N C de Koning, Wim G V Quint, Johnny Kahlert, Patti E Gravitt, Torben Steiniche, Lone K Petersen, Anne Hammer
{"title":"p16<sup>INK4a</sup> and HPV E4 immunohistochemistry for the prediction of regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2-A historical cohort study.","authors":"Rikke Damgaard, David Jenkins, Mark H Stoler, Miekel van de Sandt, Maurits N C de Koning, Wim G V Quint, Johnny Kahlert, Patti E Gravitt, Torben Steiniche, Lone K Petersen, Anne Hammer","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) is a heterogeneous diagnosis with a high likelihood of spontaneous regression. Therefore, active surveillance for CIN2 has been implemented as an option in younger women in many countries. Yet, little is known about markers that may accurately predict the likelihood of regression to support active surveillance. Here, we aimed to assess whether p16<sup>INK4a</sup> and HPV E4 status are associated with the likelihood of CIN2 regression. We conducted a historical cohort study on women aged 23-40 diagnosed with untreated CIN2 following cytology-based screening. Women were diagnosed at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark from January 2000 to December 2010. Archived tissue samples were sectioned for p16<sup>INK4a</sup> and HPV E4 immunohistochemistry and HPV genotyping. We used a modified Poisson model to estimate the relative risk of regression, adjusting for age and cytology (aRR). A total of 443 women with CIN2 were included. Most women (73.8%) were aged ≤30, and half had a high-grade cytology (48.8%). Overall, 47.6% regressed, and regression was less likely in p16<sup>INK4a</sup>-positive compared to p16<sup>INK4a</sup>-negative women (aRR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.94). Among p16<sup>INK4a</sup>-positive women, the risk of regression varied by HPV type and HPVE4 status, with lower risk in HPV16-positive women compared to those without (aRR 0.54; 95% CI 0.40-0.75) and in HPVE4-negative compared to HPVE4 positive women (aRR 0.73; 95% CI 0.54-0.98). When we restricted to expert-confirmed CIN2, the risk of regression did not vary by p16<sup>INK4a</sup> or HPVE4 status, while HPV16 positive remained at a lower risk of regression compared to women without HPV16.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) is a heterogeneous diagnosis with a high likelihood of spontaneous regression. Therefore, active surveillance for CIN2 has been implemented as an option in younger women in many countries. Yet, little is known about markers that may accurately predict the likelihood of regression to support active surveillance. Here, we aimed to assess whether p16INK4a and HPV E4 status are associated with the likelihood of CIN2 regression. We conducted a historical cohort study on women aged 23-40 diagnosed with untreated CIN2 following cytology-based screening. Women were diagnosed at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark from January 2000 to December 2010. Archived tissue samples were sectioned for p16INK4a and HPV E4 immunohistochemistry and HPV genotyping. We used a modified Poisson model to estimate the relative risk of regression, adjusting for age and cytology (aRR). A total of 443 women with CIN2 were included. Most women (73.8%) were aged ≤30, and half had a high-grade cytology (48.8%). Overall, 47.6% regressed, and regression was less likely in p16INK4a-positive compared to p16INK4a-negative women (aRR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.94). Among p16INK4a-positive women, the risk of regression varied by HPV type and HPVE4 status, with lower risk in HPV16-positive women compared to those without (aRR 0.54; 95% CI 0.40-0.75) and in HPVE4-negative compared to HPVE4 positive women (aRR 0.73; 95% CI 0.54-0.98). When we restricted to expert-confirmed CIN2, the risk of regression did not vary by p16INK4a or HPVE4 status, while HPV16 positive remained at a lower risk of regression compared to women without HPV16.
宫颈上皮内瘤变2级(CIN2)是一种异质性诊断,具有高度自发消退的可能性。因此,在许多国家,主动监测CIN2已作为一种选择在年轻女性中实施。然而,对于能够准确预测回归可能性以支持主动监测的标记物,我们知之甚少。在这里,我们旨在评估p16INK4a和HPV E4状态是否与CIN2消退的可能性相关。我们对23-40岁诊断为未经治疗的CIN2的女性进行了一项基于细胞学筛查的历史队列研究。2000年1月至2010年12月期间,这些妇女在丹麦奥胡斯大学医院接受了诊断。对存档的组织样本进行p16INK4a和HPV E4免疫组化和HPV基因分型。我们使用改进的泊松模型来估计回归的相对风险,调整年龄和细胞学(aRR)。共有443名CIN2女性被纳入研究。大多数女性(73.8%)年龄≤30岁,一半有高级别细胞学检查(48.8%)。总体而言,47.6%的女性出现了回归,p16ink4a阳性女性与p16ink4a阴性女性相比,出现回归的可能性更小(aRR 0.77;95% ci 0.64-0.94)。在p16ink4a阳性的女性中,消退的风险因HPV类型和HPVE4状态而异,hpv16阳性女性的风险低于未阳性女性(aRR 0.54;95% CI 0.40-0.75), HPVE4阴性妇女与HPVE4阳性妇女相比(aRR 0.73;95% ci 0.54-0.98)。当我们局限于专家确认的CIN2时,p16INK4a或HPVE4状态的回归风险没有变化,而HPV16阳性的女性与没有HPV16的女性相比,回归风险仍然较低。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories:
-Cancer Epidemiology-
Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics-
Infectious Causes of Cancer-
Innovative Tools and Methods-
Molecular Cancer Biology-
Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment-
Tumor Markers and Signatures-
Cancer Therapy and Prevention