Functional traits explain growth response to successive hotter droughts across a wide set of common and future tree species in Europe.

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Plant Biology Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1111/plb.70024
L Kretz, F Schnabel, R Richter, A Raabgrund, J Kattge, K Andraczek, A Kahl, T Künne, C Wirth
{"title":"Functional traits explain growth response to successive hotter droughts across a wide set of common and future tree species in Europe.","authors":"L Kretz, F Schnabel, R Richter, A Raabgrund, J Kattge, K Andraczek, A Kahl, T Künne, C Wirth","doi":"10.1111/plb.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many regions worldwide, forests increasingly suffer from droughts. The 'hotter drought' in Europe in 2018, and the consecutive drought years 2019 and 2020 caused large-scale growth declines and forest dieback. We investigated whether tree growth responses to the 2018-2020 drought can be explained by tree functional traits related to drought tolerance, growth and resource acquisition. We assessed the growth response, that is, growth during drought compared to pre-drought conditions of 71 planted tree species, using branch shoot increments. We used gap-filled trait data related to drought tolerance (P50, stomatal density, conductivity), resource acquisition (SLA, LNC, C:N, A<sub>max</sub>) and wood density from the TRY database to explain growth responses, while accounting for differences in growth programmes (spring vs. full-season growing species). We found significantly reduced growth during the 2018 drought across all species. Legacy effects further reduced growth in 2019 and 2020. Gymnosperms showed decreasing growth with increasing P50 and acquisitiveness, such as high SLA, LNC, and A<sub>max</sub>. Similar results were found for angiosperms, however, with a less clear pattern. Four distinct response types emerged: 'Sufferer', 'Late sufferer', 'Recoverer' and 'Resister', with gymnosperms predominately appearing as 'Sufferer' and 'Late sufferer'. 'Late sufferers' tended to be spring growing species. This study provides evidence for significant growth reductions and legacy effects in response to consecutive hotter droughts, which can be explained by functional traits across a wide range of tree species when accounting for fundamental growth programmes. We conclude that high drought tolerance bolsters growth reductions, while acquisitive species suffer more from drought.</p>","PeriodicalId":220,"journal":{"name":"Plant Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.70024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many regions worldwide, forests increasingly suffer from droughts. The 'hotter drought' in Europe in 2018, and the consecutive drought years 2019 and 2020 caused large-scale growth declines and forest dieback. We investigated whether tree growth responses to the 2018-2020 drought can be explained by tree functional traits related to drought tolerance, growth and resource acquisition. We assessed the growth response, that is, growth during drought compared to pre-drought conditions of 71 planted tree species, using branch shoot increments. We used gap-filled trait data related to drought tolerance (P50, stomatal density, conductivity), resource acquisition (SLA, LNC, C:N, Amax) and wood density from the TRY database to explain growth responses, while accounting for differences in growth programmes (spring vs. full-season growing species). We found significantly reduced growth during the 2018 drought across all species. Legacy effects further reduced growth in 2019 and 2020. Gymnosperms showed decreasing growth with increasing P50 and acquisitiveness, such as high SLA, LNC, and Amax. Similar results were found for angiosperms, however, with a less clear pattern. Four distinct response types emerged: 'Sufferer', 'Late sufferer', 'Recoverer' and 'Resister', with gymnosperms predominately appearing as 'Sufferer' and 'Late sufferer'. 'Late sufferers' tended to be spring growing species. This study provides evidence for significant growth reductions and legacy effects in response to consecutive hotter droughts, which can be explained by functional traits across a wide range of tree species when accounting for fundamental growth programmes. We conclude that high drought tolerance bolsters growth reductions, while acquisitive species suffer more from drought.

功能特征解释了欧洲一系列常见和未来树种对连续炎热干旱的生长反应。
在世界许多地区,森林日益遭受干旱。2018年欧洲的“炎热干旱”以及2019年和2020年的连续干旱导致了大规模的生长下降和森林枯死。我们研究了树木生长对2018-2020年干旱的响应是否可以用与耐旱性、生长和资源获取相关的功能性状来解释。我们利用枝梢增量法评估了71种人工树的生长响应,即干旱期间与干旱前的生长情况。我们利用TRY数据库中与耐旱性(P50、气孔密度、电导率)、资源获取(SLA、LNC、C:N、Amax)和木材密度相关的空白性状数据来解释生长响应,同时考虑到生长计划(春季与全季生长物种)的差异。我们发现,在2018年的干旱期间,所有物种的生长都明显减少。遗留影响进一步降低了2019年和2020年的增长。裸子植物的生长随P50和获得性(如高SLA、LNC和Amax)的增加而降低。在被子植物中也发现了类似的结果,但是模式不那么清晰。出现了四种不同的反应类型:“患者”、“晚期患者”、“康复者”和“抵抗者”,裸子植物主要表现为“患者”和“晚期患者”。“晚受者”往往是春天生长的物种。该研究为连续高温干旱导致的显著生长减少和遗留效应提供了证据,在考虑基本生长计划时,这可以通过多种树种的功能特征来解释。我们的结论是,高耐旱性促进了生长减少,而获取性物种更容易遭受干旱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Biology
Plant Biology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Plant Biology is an international journal of broad scope bringing together the different subdisciplines, such as physiology, molecular biology, cell biology, development, genetics, systematics, ecology, evolution, ecophysiology, plant-microbe interactions, and mycology. Plant Biology publishes original problem-oriented full-length research papers, short research papers, and review articles. Discussion of hot topics and provocative opinion articles are published under the heading Acute Views. From a multidisciplinary perspective, Plant Biology will provide a platform for publication, information and debate, encompassing all areas which fall within the scope of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信