{"title":"Monomer Versus Dimer of Cationic Ir(III) Complexes for Photodynamic Therapy by Two-Photon Activation: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Agoston Barta, Laetitia Vanwonterghem, Matéo Lavaud, Florian Molton, Guillaume Micouin, Anne-Laure Bulin, Akos Banyasz, Jean-Luc Coll, Frédérique Loiseau, Amandine Hurbin, Pierre-Henri Lanoë","doi":"10.1021/acsabm.5c00393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Iridium(III) complexes have been recognized as promising candidates for two-photon sensitized photodynamic therapy (PDT). In this context, we report on the study of two complexes: a monomer (<b>IrL</b><sup><b>1</b></sup>) and a dimer (<b>Ir</b><sub><b>2</b></sub><b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup>). Both complexes possess 2-phenylpyridine cyclometallating ligands and a pyridylbenzimidazole derivative as an ancillary ligand. In the dimer, the two Ir(III) centers are connected by a non-conjugated bridged bis(pyridylbenzimidazole). We compare the photophysical properties of these complexes. Both display phosphorescent emission in the orange-red part of the visible spectrum, with emissions centered at 610 nm for <b>IrL</b><sup><b>1</b></sup> and 625 nm for <b>Ir</b><sub><b>2</b></sub><b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup>, both exhibiting quantum yields of ∼24%. However, <b>Ir</b><sub><b>2</b></sub><b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup> proves to be much brighter than the monomer, making the dimer four times brighter than <b>IrL</b><sup><b>1</b></sup>. This trend is consistent under two-photon excitation (TPE), and the singlet oxygen generation quantum yields, with the dimer displaying a figure of merit (σ<sub>TPA</sub> × Φ<sub>Δ</sub>) of 40, compared to only 5 for the monomer. Both complexes generate intracellular ROS and exhibit strong phototoxicity upon blue light activation (λ = 420 nm), achieving submicromolar IC<sub>50</sub> values in HT29 and A549 cell lines after 24 h of incubation. Moreover, with TPE (λ = 800 nm), both complexes also generate intracellular ROS and induce cancer cell death.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":"4272-4284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.5c00393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Iridium(III) complexes have been recognized as promising candidates for two-photon sensitized photodynamic therapy (PDT). In this context, we report on the study of two complexes: a monomer (IrL1) and a dimer (Ir2L2). Both complexes possess 2-phenylpyridine cyclometallating ligands and a pyridylbenzimidazole derivative as an ancillary ligand. In the dimer, the two Ir(III) centers are connected by a non-conjugated bridged bis(pyridylbenzimidazole). We compare the photophysical properties of these complexes. Both display phosphorescent emission in the orange-red part of the visible spectrum, with emissions centered at 610 nm for IrL1 and 625 nm for Ir2L2, both exhibiting quantum yields of ∼24%. However, Ir2L2 proves to be much brighter than the monomer, making the dimer four times brighter than IrL1. This trend is consistent under two-photon excitation (TPE), and the singlet oxygen generation quantum yields, with the dimer displaying a figure of merit (σTPA × ΦΔ) of 40, compared to only 5 for the monomer. Both complexes generate intracellular ROS and exhibit strong phototoxicity upon blue light activation (λ = 420 nm), achieving submicromolar IC50 values in HT29 and A549 cell lines after 24 h of incubation. Moreover, with TPE (λ = 800 nm), both complexes also generate intracellular ROS and induce cancer cell death.
期刊介绍:
ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications.
The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.