Phosphorus placement and microbial inoculation effects on potato yield and phosphorus recovery

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Weige Huo, James E. Crants, Yuxin Miao, Carl J. Rosen
{"title":"Phosphorus placement and microbial inoculation effects on potato yield and phosphorus recovery","authors":"Weige Huo,&nbsp;James E. Crants,&nbsp;Yuxin Miao,&nbsp;Carl J. Rosen","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Potatoes (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i> L.) have been shown in previous studies to respond to P fertilizer on high-P testing soils. Response to P under these conditions may be due in part to their shallow root systems and poor associations with mycorrhizal fungi due to the use of fumigation to control soilborne diseases. This study evaluated the effects of P placement and microbial inoculation on tuber yield and P recovery in high-P soil. A field study with a split–split-plot randomized complete block design was conducted over 2 years, with whole plots defined by fumigation treatment (no fumigant or metam sodium) and subplots defined by cultivar (Ivory Russet or Russet Burbank). Each subplot was divided into seven sub-subplots by P treatment. Four treatments were used to evaluate banded versus broadcast P placement at 37 and 73 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> without inoculant. Four treatments were used to evaluate the effect of broadcast P at 0 and 73 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> with or without an inoculant. At equivalent P rates, banded P placement produced 4.8% greater tuber yield, 4.8% greater P uptake, and 5.0% greater P recovery efficiency (PRE) than broadcast placement. However, microbial inoculation had no effect on tuber yield, P uptake, or PRE with or without fumigation. High soil P or control of foliar fungi may have inhibited mycorrhizae. Overall, at equivalent P rates, banded P placement increased tuber yield even under high soil P conditions, but inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and other beneficial microbes had no effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) have been shown in previous studies to respond to P fertilizer on high-P testing soils. Response to P under these conditions may be due in part to their shallow root systems and poor associations with mycorrhizal fungi due to the use of fumigation to control soilborne diseases. This study evaluated the effects of P placement and microbial inoculation on tuber yield and P recovery in high-P soil. A field study with a split–split-plot randomized complete block design was conducted over 2 years, with whole plots defined by fumigation treatment (no fumigant or metam sodium) and subplots defined by cultivar (Ivory Russet or Russet Burbank). Each subplot was divided into seven sub-subplots by P treatment. Four treatments were used to evaluate banded versus broadcast P placement at 37 and 73 kg P ha−1 without inoculant. Four treatments were used to evaluate the effect of broadcast P at 0 and 73 kg P ha−1 with or without an inoculant. At equivalent P rates, banded P placement produced 4.8% greater tuber yield, 4.8% greater P uptake, and 5.0% greater P recovery efficiency (PRE) than broadcast placement. However, microbial inoculation had no effect on tuber yield, P uptake, or PRE with or without fumigation. High soil P or control of foliar fungi may have inhibited mycorrhizae. Overall, at equivalent P rates, banded P placement increased tuber yield even under high soil P conditions, but inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and other beneficial microbes had no effect.

施磷和微生物接种对马铃薯产量和磷恢复的影响
在以往的研究中,马铃薯(Solanum tuberosum L.)在高磷试验土壤上对磷肥有响应。在这些条件下对磷的反应可能部分是由于它们的浅根系和与菌根真菌的不良联系,这是由于使用熏蒸来控制土传疾病。研究了施磷和微生物接种对高磷土壤块茎产量和磷恢复的影响。采用分块-分块-随机完全区组设计进行了为期2年的实地研究,整个地块以熏蒸处理(不使用熏蒸剂或元钠)定义,亚地块以品种(象牙赤褐色或赤褐色伯班克)定义。每个子样区经P处理分为7个子样区。采用4个处理,分别在37和73 kg P / h - 1无接种剂的情况下,评估带状施磷肥和播散施磷肥的效果。采用4个处理,分别在0和73 kg P / h - 1条件下,在添加或不添加接种剂的情况下,评价播撒磷的效果。在同等施磷素水平下,带状施磷肥比撒播的块茎产量高4.8%,磷素吸收量高4.8%,磷素恢复效率(PRE)高5.0%。然而,微生物接种对块茎产量、磷吸收量和PRE没有影响。高磷土壤或控制叶面真菌可能抑制菌根。总体而言,在同等施磷量下,带状施磷即使在高磷土壤条件下也能提高块茎产量,但接种丛枝菌根真菌和其他有益微生物则没有效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信