Predicting Suicidal Ideation Among Youths With Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Advanced Machine Learning Study

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Hussein Al-Srehan, Mohammad Nayef Ayasrah, Ayoub Hamdan Al-Rousan, Mohamad Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh, Mahmoud Gharaibeh
{"title":"Predicting Suicidal Ideation Among Youths With Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Advanced Machine Learning Study","authors":"Hussein Al-Srehan,&nbsp;Mohammad Nayef Ayasrah,&nbsp;Ayoub Hamdan Al-Rousan,&nbsp;Mohamad Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh,&nbsp;Mahmoud Gharaibeh","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study aimed to predict suicidal ideation among youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by applying machine learning techniques. A cross-sectional sample of 368 ASD-diagnosed young people (aged 18–24 years) was recruited, and 34 candidate predictors—including sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric symptoms (e.g., anxiety problems and depressive symptoms), behavioural measures (e.g., bullying victimization and insomnia severity) and adverse childhood experiences—were assessed using standardized instruments and parent-report checklists. After listwise deletion of missing data, recursive feature elimination (RFE) with a random forest wrapper was performed to identify the five most influential predictors. Four classification algorithms (logistic regression, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost] and support vector machine [SVM]) were then trained on a 70/30 stratified split and evaluated on the hold-out test set using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy. RFE identified anxiety problems, insomnia, bullying victimization, age and depression (PHQ-9) as the top predictors. Logistic regression achieved an AUC of 0.943 (sensitivity = 0.773, specificity = 0.957 and accuracy = 0.922), random forest an AUC of 0.948 (sensitivity = 0.727, specificity = 0.989 and accuracy = 0.939), XGBoost an AUC of 0.930 (sensitivity = 0.772, specificity = 0.989 and accuracy = 0.947) and SVM an AUC of 0.942 (sensitivity = 0.772, specificity = 0.978 and accuracy = 0.939). Across models, anxiety and insomnia emerged as the two most important risk factors, and XGBoost demonstrated the best overall balance of performance metrics, yielding the highest accuracy. Gradient-boosted tree models were thus shown to effectively integrate multidimensional data to predict suicidality in autistic youth, highlighting anxiety and sleep disturbances as critical targets for personalized risk assessment and prevention efforts.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to predict suicidal ideation among youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by applying machine learning techniques. A cross-sectional sample of 368 ASD-diagnosed young people (aged 18–24 years) was recruited, and 34 candidate predictors—including sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric symptoms (e.g., anxiety problems and depressive symptoms), behavioural measures (e.g., bullying victimization and insomnia severity) and adverse childhood experiences—were assessed using standardized instruments and parent-report checklists. After listwise deletion of missing data, recursive feature elimination (RFE) with a random forest wrapper was performed to identify the five most influential predictors. Four classification algorithms (logistic regression, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost] and support vector machine [SVM]) were then trained on a 70/30 stratified split and evaluated on the hold-out test set using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy. RFE identified anxiety problems, insomnia, bullying victimization, age and depression (PHQ-9) as the top predictors. Logistic regression achieved an AUC of 0.943 (sensitivity = 0.773, specificity = 0.957 and accuracy = 0.922), random forest an AUC of 0.948 (sensitivity = 0.727, specificity = 0.989 and accuracy = 0.939), XGBoost an AUC of 0.930 (sensitivity = 0.772, specificity = 0.989 and accuracy = 0.947) and SVM an AUC of 0.942 (sensitivity = 0.772, specificity = 0.978 and accuracy = 0.939). Across models, anxiety and insomnia emerged as the two most important risk factors, and XGBoost demonstrated the best overall balance of performance metrics, yielding the highest accuracy. Gradient-boosted tree models were thus shown to effectively integrate multidimensional data to predict suicidality in autistic youth, highlighting anxiety and sleep disturbances as critical targets for personalized risk assessment and prevention efforts.

预测自闭症谱系障碍青少年的自杀意念:一个先进的机器学习研究
本研究旨在通过应用机器学习技术预测自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)青少年的自杀意念。研究招募了368名被诊断为自闭症的年轻人(年龄在18-24岁之间)的横断面样本,并使用标准化工具和家长报告核对表评估了34个候选预测因子,包括社会人口学特征、精神症状(如焦虑问题和抑郁症状)、行为测量(如欺凌受害和失眠严重程度)和不良童年经历。在按列表方式删除缺失数据后,使用随机森林包装器进行递归特征消除(RFE),以确定五个最具影响力的预测因子。然后在70/30分层分割上训练四种分类算法(逻辑回归、随机森林、极端梯度增强[XGBoost]和支持向量机[SVM]),并在保留测试集上使用曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性进行评估。RFE发现焦虑问题、失眠、受欺凌、年龄和抑郁(PHQ-9)是最重要的预测因素。Logistic回归的AUC为0.943(灵敏度= 0.773,特异性= 0.957,准确度= 0.922),随机森林的AUC为0.948(灵敏度= 0.727,特异性= 0.989,准确度= 0.939),XGBoost的AUC为0.930(灵敏度= 0.772,特异性= 0.989,准确度= 0.947),SVM的AUC为0.942(灵敏度= 0.772,特异性= 0.978,准确度= 0.939)。在所有模型中,焦虑和失眠成为两个最重要的风险因素,XGBoost展示了性能指标的最佳整体平衡,产生了最高的准确性。因此,梯度增强树模型被证明可以有效地整合多维数据来预测自闭症青少年的自杀行为,强调焦虑和睡眠障碍是个性化风险评估和预防工作的关键目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信