{"title":"Development of Priority Outcome Domains for Community Mental Health Research via Consensus Among Multiple Stakeholders: Online Delphi Study in Japan","authors":"Takuma Shiozawa, Sosei Yamaguchi, Momoka Igarashi, Makoto Ogawa, Makiko Abe, Naonori Yasuma, Takayuki Kawaguchi, Chiyo Fujii","doi":"10.1111/inm.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several core outcome sets (COS) have been developed in the field of mental health; however, the specific outcome domains that should be prioritised in community mental health research remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the key outcome domains for community mental health research in Japan, as determined by multiple stakeholders. First, a comprehensive list of outcome domains was compiled by scoping reviews, focus group interviews, and web-based questionnaire surveys. This was followed by two rounds of preliminary surveys with multiple stakeholders. Finally, three rounds of a web-based Delphi survey were conducted to determine the most important outcome domains of community mental health research in Japan. A total of 96 outcome domains were evaluated by 297 participants, with a response rate of 93.6%. This study identified 24 outcome domains that are essential for community mental health research in Japan. These 24 domains, which reached a consensus, included aspects related to comprehensive symptom assessment and personal recovery. Given that community care serves patients with diverse illnesses, identifying outcome domains that are broadly applicable across different community care settings rather than being limited to specific conditions is critical for future research. The study also highlights differences in perspectives among stakeholders regarding the importance of various outcomes. Despite these differences, several outcome domains have been recognised as being significantly important in the overall consensus.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000044680.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Several core outcome sets (COS) have been developed in the field of mental health; however, the specific outcome domains that should be prioritised in community mental health research remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the key outcome domains for community mental health research in Japan, as determined by multiple stakeholders. First, a comprehensive list of outcome domains was compiled by scoping reviews, focus group interviews, and web-based questionnaire surveys. This was followed by two rounds of preliminary surveys with multiple stakeholders. Finally, three rounds of a web-based Delphi survey were conducted to determine the most important outcome domains of community mental health research in Japan. A total of 96 outcome domains were evaluated by 297 participants, with a response rate of 93.6%. This study identified 24 outcome domains that are essential for community mental health research in Japan. These 24 domains, which reached a consensus, included aspects related to comprehensive symptom assessment and personal recovery. Given that community care serves patients with diverse illnesses, identifying outcome domains that are broadly applicable across different community care settings rather than being limited to specific conditions is critical for future research. The study also highlights differences in perspectives among stakeholders regarding the importance of various outcomes. Despite these differences, several outcome domains have been recognised as being significantly important in the overall consensus.
Trial Registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000044680.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research.
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues.
The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed.
Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.