Evelina La Civita, Mariano Fiorenza, Giuseppe Jannuzzi, Carmela Polito, Rosa Sirica, Gianluigi Carbone, Domenica Sorvillo, Aniello Saviano, Matteo Ferro, Daniela Terracciano
{"title":"Comparison Between a New PSA Assay With the Well-Established Beckman Coulter Immunoassay: A Preliminary Report","authors":"Evelina La Civita, Mariano Fiorenza, Giuseppe Jannuzzi, Carmela Polito, Rosa Sirica, Gianluigi Carbone, Domenica Sorvillo, Aniello Saviano, Matteo Ferro, Daniela Terracciano","doi":"10.1002/ansa.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a critical biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa) patient clinical management. In this study, we sought to compare three different immunoassays (CLIA): Beckman Coulter Access Hybritech (PSA-B) (reference method), Immulite 2000 PSA (PSA-I) and the newly introduced Atellica IM PSA assay (PSA-A). We selected serum samples from our routine clinical testing at University Hospital Federico II between April and May 2024 from 104 men with a median age of 66 years (interquartile range = 57–74). Total PSA was determined using three different assays: PSA-B, PSA-A and PSA-I. A significant correlation between PSA-B and PSA-I assays was found for samples in the overall population (Spearman <i>r</i> (<i>ρ</i>) = 0.99, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). PSA-I displayed a strong correlation with PSA-B for values below 2 ng/mL (<i>ρ</i> = 0.98, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), for values between 2 and 10 ng/mL (<i>ρ</i> = 0.97, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and for values above 10 ng/mL (<i>ρ</i> = 0.77, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). A significant positive correlation was found between PSA-B and PSA-A in the overall population (<i>ρ</i> = 0.97, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and in stratified analyses between PSA-A and PSA-B for values below 2 ng/mL (<i>ρ</i> = 0.86, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), from 2 ng/mL to 10 ng/mL (<i>ρ</i> = 0.93, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and above 10 ng/mL (<i>ρ</i> = 0.77, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Although both PSA-I and PSA-A demonstrated a significant positive correlation with PSA-B, PSA-I displayed a significantly better correlation with PSA-B than PSA-A in samples with PSA below 2 ng/mL.</p>","PeriodicalId":93411,"journal":{"name":"Analytical science advances","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ansa.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical science advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ansa.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a critical biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa) patient clinical management. In this study, we sought to compare three different immunoassays (CLIA): Beckman Coulter Access Hybritech (PSA-B) (reference method), Immulite 2000 PSA (PSA-I) and the newly introduced Atellica IM PSA assay (PSA-A). We selected serum samples from our routine clinical testing at University Hospital Federico II between April and May 2024 from 104 men with a median age of 66 years (interquartile range = 57–74). Total PSA was determined using three different assays: PSA-B, PSA-A and PSA-I. A significant correlation between PSA-B and PSA-I assays was found for samples in the overall population (Spearman r (ρ) = 0.99, p < 0.0001). PSA-I displayed a strong correlation with PSA-B for values below 2 ng/mL (ρ = 0.98, p < 0.0001), for values between 2 and 10 ng/mL (ρ = 0.97, p < 0.0001) and for values above 10 ng/mL (ρ = 0.77, p < 0.0001). A significant positive correlation was found between PSA-B and PSA-A in the overall population (ρ = 0.97, p < 0.0001) and in stratified analyses between PSA-A and PSA-B for values below 2 ng/mL (ρ = 0.86, p < 0.0001), from 2 ng/mL to 10 ng/mL (ρ = 0.93, p < 0.0001) and above 10 ng/mL (ρ = 0.77, p < 0.0001). Although both PSA-I and PSA-A demonstrated a significant positive correlation with PSA-B, PSA-I displayed a significantly better correlation with PSA-B than PSA-A in samples with PSA below 2 ng/mL.