Robert M. Malina, António Antunes, Élvio Gouveia, Gonçalo Marques, Martine Thomis, Duarte Freitas
{"title":"Participants and Non-Participants in Organized Sports 11–14 Years: Growth, Maturity Status, Physical Activity, Motor Coordination and Physical Fitness","authors":"Robert M. Malina, António Antunes, Élvio Gouveia, Gonçalo Marques, Martine Thomis, Duarte Freitas","doi":"10.1002/ajhb.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the growth and maturity status, physical activity, motor coordination, and physical fitness of youth participants and non-participants in organized sports.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Subjects and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The sample included 161 boys and 187 girls 11–12 years and 128 boys and 143 girls 13–14 years. Height, weight, skeletal age (SA), physical activity, motor coordination, and fitness were assessed. Sex-specific comparisons of participants and non-participants in sport within each chronological age (CA) group were evaluated with independent-samples <i>t</i>-tests and one-way between-groups analyses of covariance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Differences in CA, SA, and body size of participants and non-participants in sport were negligible. Youth active in sport reported higher levels of physical activity within each CA group and sex. Among youth 11–12 years, boys participating in sport performed better than non-participants in the four motor coordination tasks, while girls participating in sport performed significantly better than non-participants in jumping side-to-side. Among youth 13–14 years, the two groups of boys did not differ in motor coordination, while girls participating in sport performed better than non-participants in balancing backwards. Boys active in sport in both CA groups were more proficient in most physical fitness tests, while girls active in sport were more proficient only in sit-ups in both CA groups, and in the standing long jump and bent arm hang at 13–14 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Youth participants in sport were physically more active and generally performed better in motor coordination and fitness items, although the significance of differences varied among tasks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50809,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Human Biology","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajhb.70060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
To compare the growth and maturity status, physical activity, motor coordination, and physical fitness of youth participants and non-participants in organized sports.
Subjects and Methods
The sample included 161 boys and 187 girls 11–12 years and 128 boys and 143 girls 13–14 years. Height, weight, skeletal age (SA), physical activity, motor coordination, and fitness were assessed. Sex-specific comparisons of participants and non-participants in sport within each chronological age (CA) group were evaluated with independent-samples t-tests and one-way between-groups analyses of covariance.
Results
Differences in CA, SA, and body size of participants and non-participants in sport were negligible. Youth active in sport reported higher levels of physical activity within each CA group and sex. Among youth 11–12 years, boys participating in sport performed better than non-participants in the four motor coordination tasks, while girls participating in sport performed significantly better than non-participants in jumping side-to-side. Among youth 13–14 years, the two groups of boys did not differ in motor coordination, while girls participating in sport performed better than non-participants in balancing backwards. Boys active in sport in both CA groups were more proficient in most physical fitness tests, while girls active in sport were more proficient only in sit-ups in both CA groups, and in the standing long jump and bent arm hang at 13–14 years.
Conclusion
Youth participants in sport were physically more active and generally performed better in motor coordination and fitness items, although the significance of differences varied among tasks.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Human Biology is the Official Journal of the Human Biology Association.
The American Journal of Human Biology is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed, internationally circulated journal that publishes reports of original research, theoretical articles and timely reviews, and brief communications in the interdisciplinary field of human biology. As the official journal of the Human Biology Association, the Journal also publishes abstracts of research presented at its annual scientific meeting and book reviews relevant to the field.
The Journal seeks scholarly manuscripts that address all aspects of human biology, health, and disease, particularly those that stress comparative, developmental, ecological, or evolutionary perspectives. The transdisciplinary areas covered in the Journal include, but are not limited to, epidemiology, genetic variation, population biology and demography, physiology, anatomy, nutrition, growth and aging, physical performance, physical activity and fitness, ecology, and evolution, along with their interactions. The Journal publishes basic, applied, and methodologically oriented research from all areas, including measurement, analytical techniques and strategies, and computer applications in human biology.
Like many other biologically oriented disciplines, the field of human biology has undergone considerable growth and diversification in recent years, and the expansion of the aims and scope of the Journal is a reflection of this growth and membership diversification.
The Journal is committed to prompt review, and priority publication is given to manuscripts with novel or timely findings, and to manuscripts of unusual interest.