Applying a systems thinking lens to child sexual abuse in sport: an analysis of investigative report findings and recommendations

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Karl Dodd , Paul M. Salmon , Colin Solomon , Scott McLean
{"title":"Applying a systems thinking lens to child sexual abuse in sport: an analysis of investigative report findings and recommendations","authors":"Karl Dodd ,&nbsp;Paul M. Salmon ,&nbsp;Colin Solomon ,&nbsp;Scott McLean","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sporting organisations and governing bodies are facing increased pressure to prevent child sexual abuse (CSA) in sport. This has led to an increase in investigative reports into CSA that include recommendations on how sporting organisations could improve child safeguarding. Current peer reviewed literature on the prevention of CSA in sport, indicates that the majority of research has been on interventions at the levels of the victim and perpetrator, rather than on broader components of the sports system. However, it is not clear whether this is the case in investigative reports.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to analyse investigative reports into CSA in five Australian sports (Swimming, Cricket, Gymnastics, Football, and Tennis), to evaluate the extent to which a systems thinking approach was adopted to understand the broader systemic factors enabling CSA in sport.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Factors enabling CSA detailed in the reports, as well as their accompanying recommendations, were mapped to a systems thinking-based framework. The identified enabling factors and recommendations were then evaluated to determine the extent to which a whole of systems focus had been adopted in the investigative reports.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 30 enabling factors to CSA were identified, with the majority focused at the higher levels of the sports system (e.g., Governance, Policy, Reporting/Handling issues etc.). This contrasts with the peer reviewed literature.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings indicate that the identified enabling factors to CSA align with a systems thinking approach, whereas the recommendations to safeguarding partially adhere to the tenets of system thinking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 107488"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425002431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sporting organisations and governing bodies are facing increased pressure to prevent child sexual abuse (CSA) in sport. This has led to an increase in investigative reports into CSA that include recommendations on how sporting organisations could improve child safeguarding. Current peer reviewed literature on the prevention of CSA in sport, indicates that the majority of research has been on interventions at the levels of the victim and perpetrator, rather than on broader components of the sports system. However, it is not clear whether this is the case in investigative reports.

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyse investigative reports into CSA in five Australian sports (Swimming, Cricket, Gymnastics, Football, and Tennis), to evaluate the extent to which a systems thinking approach was adopted to understand the broader systemic factors enabling CSA in sport.

Method

Factors enabling CSA detailed in the reports, as well as their accompanying recommendations, were mapped to a systems thinking-based framework. The identified enabling factors and recommendations were then evaluated to determine the extent to which a whole of systems focus had been adopted in the investigative reports.

Results

In total, 30 enabling factors to CSA were identified, with the majority focused at the higher levels of the sports system (e.g., Governance, Policy, Reporting/Handling issues etc.). This contrasts with the peer reviewed literature.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that the identified enabling factors to CSA align with a systems thinking approach, whereas the recommendations to safeguarding partially adhere to the tenets of system thinking.
运用系统思考的视角来看待体育运动中的儿童性虐待:对调查报告结果和建议的分析
体育组织和管理机构正面临着越来越大的压力,以防止体育中的儿童性虐待(CSA)。这导致了对CSA的调查报告的增加,其中包括关于体育组织如何改善儿童保护的建议。目前关于体育运动中CSA预防的同行评议文献表明,大多数研究都是在受害者和肇事者的层面上进行干预,而不是在体育系统的更广泛组成部分。然而,尚不清楚调查报告中的情况是否如此。本研究的目的是分析澳大利亚五项运动(游泳、板球、体操、足球和网球)中CSA的调查报告,以评估采用系统思维方法来理解运动中CSA产生的更广泛的系统因素的程度。方法将报告中详述的实现CSA的因素及其附带的建议映射到基于系统思维的框架中。然后对确定的促成因素和建议进行评价,以确定调查报告采用整个系统重点的程度。结果共确定了30个促成CSA的因素,其中大多数集中在体育系统的较高层次(例如,治理,政策,报告/处理问题等)。这与同行评议的文献形成对比。结论研究结果表明,确定的CSA使能因素符合系统思维方法,而保护的建议部分坚持系统思维的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信