A stakeholder perspective on the drivers and barriers influencing the emergence of deep-sea mining

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Manuel Bellanger , Pierre Scemama , Denis Bailly , Shani Friedman , Ugo Massé , Joëlle Richard , Olivier Thébaud
{"title":"A stakeholder perspective on the drivers and barriers influencing the emergence of deep-sea mining","authors":"Manuel Bellanger ,&nbsp;Pierre Scemama ,&nbsp;Denis Bailly ,&nbsp;Shani Friedman ,&nbsp;Ugo Massé ,&nbsp;Joëlle Richard ,&nbsp;Olivier Thébaud","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The identification of drivers and barriers influencing the initiation of commercial deep-sea mining (DSM) is key to developing research approaches to support the development of adequate DSM management frameworks. This study aims to provide a systems-level understanding of DSM drivers and barriers integrating both academic literature and diverse stakeholder perspectives (industry, NGOs, policy-makers, and academic researchers). To this end, we carry out a political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal (PESTEL) analysis combining the results of a literature survey, a participatory workshop, and semi-structured interviews. The results provide a broad overview of scientific knowledge and uncertainties relating to DSM drivers and barriers identified in the literature, alongside a synthesis of emerging perspectives and concerns expressed by stakeholders during the participatory workshop and interviews. The discussion highlights both areas of consensus and divergence across stakeholder groups and the literature, as well as a critical reflection on the relevance and limitations of the PESTEL approach, highlighting research needs to further support holistic decision making around DSM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 105623"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725001655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The identification of drivers and barriers influencing the initiation of commercial deep-sea mining (DSM) is key to developing research approaches to support the development of adequate DSM management frameworks. This study aims to provide a systems-level understanding of DSM drivers and barriers integrating both academic literature and diverse stakeholder perspectives (industry, NGOs, policy-makers, and academic researchers). To this end, we carry out a political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal (PESTEL) analysis combining the results of a literature survey, a participatory workshop, and semi-structured interviews. The results provide a broad overview of scientific knowledge and uncertainties relating to DSM drivers and barriers identified in the literature, alongside a synthesis of emerging perspectives and concerns expressed by stakeholders during the participatory workshop and interviews. The discussion highlights both areas of consensus and divergence across stakeholder groups and the literature, as well as a critical reflection on the relevance and limitations of the PESTEL approach, highlighting research needs to further support holistic decision making around DSM.
从利益攸关方角度看影响深海采矿出现的驱动因素和障碍
确定影响开始商业深海采矿的驱动因素和障碍是制定研究方法以支持制定适当的深海采矿管理框架的关键。本研究旨在整合学术文献和不同利益相关者(行业、非政府组织、政策制定者和学术研究人员)的观点,提供对DSM驱动因素和障碍的系统级理解。为此,我们结合文献调查、参与式研讨会和半结构化访谈的结果,进行了政治、经济、社会、技术、环境和法律(PESTEL)分析。研究结果对文献中发现的与DSM驱动因素和障碍相关的科学知识和不确定性进行了全面概述,同时对参与性研讨会和访谈中利益相关者表达的新兴观点和担忧进行了综合。讨论强调了利益相关者群体和文献之间的共识和分歧,以及对PESTEL方法的相关性和局限性的批判性反思,强调了研究需要进一步支持围绕DSM的整体决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信